Top: Future Film R2 Finland (84:20 / PAL / Progressive)
Second: Mei Ah R0 Hong Kong (87:48 / NTSC / Interlaced)
Third: Third Window Films R2 UK
Bottom: Dragon Dynasty R1 US
My TV dislikes the Mei Ah disc for some reason. Sometimes darkness/shadows display as bright red. I'm not kidding. I don't know what's causing it. I must have tested over 500 dvds with that TV and this is the only one causing problems. Everything is fine on my computer screen, though.
Last edited by HungFist on 15 May 2008, 21:48, edited 7 times in total.
I used to be "the man who loves the movies you hate".
Now I'm just "that weird french guy with a cat avatar who comes to BnB once a year for no reason and then disappears again".
Yeah. Mei Ah has much better brightness. FF however looks otherwise very good. Also, I don't have the equipment to make any statements but even on my 28" the FF looks somehow more "stable". Is this because one is progressive and the other isn't? I though I wouldn't notice any difference because I don't have any high end equipment...
Except for the Mei Ah they all look so similar it's hard to tell which looks better. I'd pick up the R1 though, as it's the best English friendly version.
I'd go with the R2 in terms of subs. They translate lines the way they should be and make more sense. But on the other hand, R1 has its' attributes and translates more words in sentences properly which I'm sure the other English-subbed releases doesn't (R2 misses some of those words leaving out what's actually being told outside the subs). R1 wins for the extras.