Page 3 of 3
Posted: 08 Feb 2008, 17:03
by grim_tales
I think you're spot on Mark. In both DVDs (R2/R3) I compared the beginning and CYF death scene and both seem to match the original script bang on.
Posted: 08 Feb 2008, 17:23
by bradavon
tom2681 wrote:It might be worth noting that I bought my R2UK on the day of its release.
So it's got to be from the very first batch.
Mark's also match yours and he bought his much later.
Markgway wrote:It seems one set of subs are a transcription of the original script whilst the other set are a translation of the Mandarin dialogue.
Then in other words neither are actually more accurate than each other

Posted: 08 Feb 2008, 19:56
by saltysam
i won't be getting this again till the BD comes out later this year.
Posted: 08 Feb 2008, 20:44
by bradavon
Is it scheduled? It was due to come then nothing.
I doubt I would now, for the same reason. I would have a few years back though definitely.
Posted: 08 Feb 2008, 21:03
by tom2681
Brad wrote:Tom: Would a 32" LCD TV pick up the SB differences? I understand they're minute. Is the DTS much better to the DD5.1?
The differences are indeed very minute.
Want a quick DVD PQ comparison ?
I can do that.
Can't really comment on the sound.
Most DD and DTS tracks sound virtually identical on my amp.
Posted: 08 Feb 2008, 21:12
by bradavon
tom2681 wrote:The differences are indeed very minute.
Want a quick DVD PQ comparison ?
I can do that.
Yes please.
Here is the comparison review Jenz did. You can see he has zoomed in on one of the shots:
http://www.alexmccaffrey.com/misc/Crouc ... arison.pdf
But yes please a "Tom Style Comparison Review" would be neat.
tom2681 wrote:Can't really comment on the sound.
Most DD and DTS tracks sound virtually identical on my amp.
Or they sound virtually identical to you? You cannot notice any differences?
Posted: 08 Feb 2008, 21:20
by tom2681
Yea, I'm not good with sound.
I can barely tell the difference between 128 kbits/s MP3 and CD quality.
Posted: 08 Feb 2008, 21:42
by bradavon
tom2681 wrote:I can barely tell the difference between 128 kbits/s MP3 and CD quality.
I cannot either. I wonder if anyone really can but when it comes to DTS/DD5.1 I can often tell.
I'm surprised you cannot of all people, consider how good your eyes seem to be.
Posted: 09 Feb 2008, 03:01
by Markgway
bradavon wrote:tom2681 wrote:It might be worth noting that I bought my R2UK on the day of its release.
So it's got to be from the very first batch.
Mark's also match yours and he bought his much later.
No, I bought mine the week it was released.
Markgway wrote:It seems one set of subs are a transcription of the original script whilst the other set are a translation of the Mandarin dialogue.
bradavon wrote:Then in other words neither are actually more accurate than each other

Well, the "accurate" subs are a translation of what was actually said as opposed to originally intended, so yeah, they are more accurate.
Re: Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon - question
Posted: 19 Aug 2014, 22:08
by luckystars
After reading this I think I'll get the UK Blu

Re: Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon - question
Posted: 19 Aug 2014, 23:44
by grim_tales
But that has a different set of subs, right?

Re: Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon - question
Posted: 20 Aug 2014, 07:28
by luckystars
My OCD wont allow it
The theatrical subs might have been the original screenplay, but like any film they adapt and changed dialogue in the filming process. In effect the actors were speaking a new Mandarin draft under Lee's direction. The new subs are a translation of what was actually spoken (shooting script).
Plus it's HD

Re: Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon - question
Posted: 25 Aug 2014, 17:23
by Killer Meteor
Not very good HD - it seems to break up into blurry frames in a few places.
Re: Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon - question
Posted: 25 Aug 2014, 18:22
by luckystars
Ivan Drago wrote:Not very good HD - it seems to break up into blurry frames in a few places.
Hmmm I wonder if all HD releases are the same
Re: Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon - question
Posted: 25 Aug 2014, 18:44
by Shingster
I think Ivan's being very harsh on the BD release there, yes the encoding falters at times but otherwise it's a very nice transfer.
Re: Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon - question
Posted: 25 Aug 2014, 23:28
by Killer Meteor
I dunno...it's the only BD I have where the encoding falters in that manner. Be interesting if Sony revisited it for 'Mastered in 4k'
Re: Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon - question
Posted: 26 Aug 2014, 04:49
by Shingster
Sounds like you might have a faulty disc if the encoding is faltering repeatedly? Not many grabs in the
caps-a-holic comparison but there are no signs of major blocking, in fact the encode seems little better on the UK disc than the German there.
Re: Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon - question
Posted: 26 Aug 2014, 06:16
by luckystars
No a spectacular transfer, but a definite jump from DVD^^
Re: Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon - question
Posted: 26 Aug 2014, 17:27
by Killer Meteor
Shingster wrote:Sounds like you might have a faulty disc if the encoding is faltering repeatedly? Not many grabs in the
caps-a-holic comparison but there are no signs of major blocking, in fact the encode seems little better on the UK disc than the German there.
No, you can see it in the transfer on youtube too. It is blink-and-you'll miss it, I admit.
Re: Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon - question
Posted: 26 Aug 2014, 18:19
by Shingster
Are you talking about one isolated incident where the picture breaks up or something repeatedly appearing? If it's the former give me a timecode and I'll check my disc. I reviewed the disc back when it came out and didn't notice anything major like that (I think the worst moment of noise was the scene when Zhang Ziyi dives into some water), but it wouldn't be the first time I've missed a fleeting glitch.