Through a Ceefax Entertainment article, I read Oliver Stone plans to release an EE of Alexander, with a runtime of 3 hours 40 minutes - but this isn't a DC
He says the longer version will "allow you to immerse yourself in the classical world"
And who said either of those two movies were any good?bradavon wrote:I've always liked the Theatrical Cut (yes I agree it's ropey around the edges but frankly no more so than Gangs of New York) and found it odd I'm the only one who found the battles really well done. They're far better than the Troy battles.
thedvdf wrote:Director OliverStone will release a third version of his Alexander epic in a bid to win over critics who originally mauled the movie. The Platoon filmmaker insists the cinematic version of Alexander was hampered by time constraints after being slashed to 168 minutes in length. Stone originally wanted to release the movie in its original three-hour form but concerned studio bosses forced him to axe scenes containing homosexual content. The new DVD-only release will be a staggering three hours and 40 minutes in length, and will feature footage edited out of the original cut. Stone says, "This thing has haunted me. By truncating it into three hours, we lost things that were important. This version allows you to immerse yourself in the classical world."
You seriously reckon it's still "as badly flawed"? Sure you still don't like it but you reckon it's no better?romerojpg wrote:But there wasnt an excellent film trying to break out of Kingdom of Heaven! the longer cut is still as badly flawed and the extra footage doesnt change the film at all, just makes it longer and doesnt make the flaws any better at all.
Me when I said:gojensen wrote:And who said either of those two movies were any good?
Huh?Kurgan wrote:The best bit about Alexaner was the cry of "Back, and to the left!" by Alexander... Stone just can't let it lie, can he?
Probably but technically it will be a quad-dip or is it a double dip as I only own one version nowEvaUnit02 wrote:LOL, time for Brad to triple-dip.
Firstly, thanks for bringing that typo to my attentionbradavon wrote:Huh?Kurgan wrote:The best bit about Alexaner was the cry of "Back, and to the left!" by Alexander... Stone just can't let it lie, can he?

It is "Better" but it didnt fill in a single flaw I had with the film and I was gutted at the pacing, battle flaws, timeline etc.. still not working for me. It just felt like massive chunks were still missing and whole sections just felt lost. It was suposed to take place over 3 years! it felt like 3 weeks to mebradavon wrote:You seriously reckon it's still "as badly flawed"? Sure you still don't like it but you reckon it's no better?romerojpg wrote:But there wasnt an excellent film trying to break out of Kingdom of Heaven! the longer cut is still as badly flawed and the extra footage doesnt change the film at all, just makes it longer and doesnt make the flaws any better at all.
Dude you hard to please. It's massively better, a completely different film. The TC frankly should never have existed.