Brad wrote:forums are full of disgruntled customers
When the DVD is perfect, there's nothing to discuss.
That's why most threads are filled with nothing but complaints.
I used to be "the man who loves the movies you hate".
Now I'm just "that weird french guy with a cat avatar who comes to BnB once a year for no reason and then disappears again".
I reckon that if a film is good you could chop it up and have it reassembled by those Shakeapeare writing monkeys with no ill effect. I don't mind small changes, in truth I often hardly notice them. I'll be damned if I can easily tell the difference between the various cuts of Blade Runnner, and who cares of Han doesn't shoot first - it means nothing. I feel it does no hamr if a director decides they want to update their film or a little or has the freedom to return to a proejct they were never happy with, or had control over. We often discuss the diorectors intentions with DVD transfers, what's the difference here? It's green tint.
Of course you could all be going on about something else entirely but I'm not fucking reading anything that featuring Brad and post dissection.
Lourdes wrote:I don't mind small changes, in truth I often hardly notice them.
Me neither.
Lourdes wrote:I'll be damned if I can easily tell the difference between the various cuts of Blade Runnner
The differences between the Theatrical Cut, Director's Cut and Final Cut are extensive. I cannot tell the difference between the International and American Theatrical Cut though.
Lourdes wrote:and who cares of Han doesn't shoot first - it means nothing.
It worked better how it was originally shown but agreed I don't particularly care.
Lourdes wrote:We often discuss the diorectors intentions with DVD transfers, what's the difference here?
Agreed. You raise a valid point.
Those are different though. Re-cutting/altering a film is often more drastic than different remastering processes.
A sumptuous visual and aural feast that demands to be seen in theatres. Frankie Chan's haunting score (that I was already familiar with, thanks to TheLostDragon.) fits every scene perfectly.
Leslie Cheung dominates this film. Ouyang Feng will definitely be a role that will come to the surface whenever I think about this actor, from now on.
The story itself is a series of connected vignettes about mostly lovelorn individuals... Wong Kar Wai by the numbers really. I found the Brigitte Lin story to be the most entertaining.
P.S. This is the only version of the film that I've seen.
I used to be "the man who loves the movies you hate".
Now I'm just "that weird french guy with a cat avatar who comes to BnB once a year for no reason and then disappears again".
What is it with Asian servers and shit bandwidth. The 720p trailer is only downloading at 27Kb a second, at this rate it will take an hour to download a 100Mb file.
All the Kino WKW releases were interlaced IIRC. Their DVD SE is still the best AFFORDABLE release of Happy Together. Fuck paying $130 odd for the Taiwan/HK release with the lava lamp and boxers.
I only re-bought the R1 SE not long ago (when I sold my box set). I'd much prefer that cover art. Oh well, it's just cover art.
EDIT: Presuming the HKFlix listing is correct, this is more than just a new cover. Kino have added:
Happy Together:
# Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround
# 2008 Documentary: "Wong Kar-Wai At The Museum Of The Moving Image" (44 mins.)
Fallen Angels:
# Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround
# 3 Behind The Scenes Featurettes
# Christopher Doyle Interview
But they appear to have removed the DD2.0 from the previous SE. The 5.1 remixes for the R3 SEs of Fallen Angels and Chunking Express are decent, these maybe too.
I doubt Fallen Angels betters the R3 SE but I wonder how Happy Together fairs.
The Happy Together HK LE has DTS and DD5.1 but no DD2.0. As do the Korean SEs of Chunking Express and Fallen Angels (I imagine the HK SEs are the same).