
Now I want them to announce their FUCKING NEW EDITION OF SEVEN SAMURAI FFS.

A few months ago.grim_tales wrote:When did Romero say that?
About the commentary:-dvdtalk wrote:Video 4/5 & Audio 4/5
Third time's the charm. First released to DVD with an atrocious, flat transfer by Fox Lorber, then in a bizarre, much over-tweaked if enhanced one by Wellspring, Criterion's DVD finally gets it right, rendering these earlier travesties worthless by comparison. Though the 1.85:1 image (apparently sourced from Japan as they include the Japanese distributor's credit) still suffers a bit from the limitations of mid-1980s processing technologies - Would Kurosawa have liked to have gone back to digitally-enhance his color design and remove printing flaws, I wonder? - visually this is far sharper with better color than it has been in years. Even in 35mm on big screens, Ran rarely looked this good. Criterion's booklet helpfully notes the dual-layer DVD-9 "was encoded at the highest possible bit rate for the quantity of the material included." It shows. The Dolby Digital 2.0 mix suffered much less in earlier incarnations, and sounds splendid here. The English subtitles are removable.
Disc 1 continues with an Audio Commentary by Stephen Prince, author of The Warrior's Camera; The Cinema of Akira Kurosawa. This is apparently the same commentary track Prince recorded for the Wellspring "Masterworks" edition with some new content edited in. Peter Grilli's second audio commentary track from the Wellspring edition does not appear here. The commentary track is helpfully indexed.
If you already own it extras I image. It is nearly half the price too and will probably stay that way.thelostdragon wrote:What's wrong with the UK's 2 discer? Any reason to upgrade?
DVDBeaver.Any screen captures up comparing the Criterion to the French/UK/Australian DVDs?
Thanks.Tom2681 wrote:DVDBeaver.
All the reviews I've read say the French master is lovely.Tom2681 wrote:About the french dvd: I've seen it once, and it has too much print damage to be worth anything. Criterion's the way to go now.
The DD5.1 remix on the R4 is excellent.bradavon wrote:Does anyone know how the remix fairs?
no, it has DD2.0 STEREO. Ran's original theatrical sound mix was stereo - there's no Japanese mono track.he UK R2 has Mono
His name is Kurosawa. You insulting a filmmaking god like that is unforgivable.romerojpg wrote:Scary that they are still not re-releasing the best Kurasawa films of this quality
Bullshit, the Studio Canal transfer is stunning.Tom2681 wrote: About the french dvd: I've seen it once, and it has too much print damage to be worth anything. Criterion's the way to go now.
I disagree, Ran is far better than both Yojimbo and Sanjuro. Those two are just well-made action film - Ran is an epic. But yes, Yojimbo/Sanjuro do need English releases that do them justice. I would cite the Eastern Eye R4's, but they're NTSC>PAL - thus they're instant garbage.romerojpg wrote:The tripple bill of superb samuirai films
Yojimbo
Sanjuro
I dont think Ran is even close to these 3 films or most other Kurasawa samurai films even.
Now I'm stuck. The Criterion or the R4 with DD5.1 remix.EvaUnit02 wrote:The DD5.1 remix on the R4 is excellent.
Whatever!no, it has DD2.0 STEREO. Ran's original theatrical sound mix was stereo - there's no Japanese mono track.
Are all their Kurosawa titles NTSC to PAL? Even so I still reckon the R4 SS looks the best.I would cite the Eastern Eye R4's, but they're NTSC>PAL - thus they're instant garbage.
I know it's very weird. I did a big search earlier and could barely find it anywhere.jimmyscab wrote:UK R2 is OOP wtf ? so soon !
I don't own Ran period yet but this is what I now:Badavon can you confirm the video transfer on the R4 is the same as the UK R2 and includes the doc?
That's exactly what I was thinking. I'll probably plump for the R4; £17 is a lot to spend on a DVD you're not entirely happy with.The Criterion does look like a nice package but im not sure i like that red tint.
It does ? thats the version I have and it looked fantastic to me, perhaps a little soft (intentional?) but the colours looked great. The problem with screenshots is comparing jpeg images side by side you can get overly critical. Take Ben Hur for example, the new 4 Disc set doesnt look as sharp as the older release yet people are saying it doesnt matter, on TV it still looks jaw dropping. The new UK Black Narcissus to my eyes looks like the colours are a bit off, yet most people say this is the best version and blows Criterion out the water.bradavon wrote:The older R1 Masterworks version has the same problem.
Yeah i know - typo ! Bad-Boy-Brad.p.s - It's Bradavon Wink