Your Highness

saltysam · Post by **saltysam** » 31 Dec 2010, 14:48

Don't know what the movie will be like but be prepared to come in your pants at the sight of Natalie Portman in a thong

http://uk.ign.com/videos/2010/11/17/you ... ed-trailer

Yi-Long · Post by **Yi-Long** » 31 Dec 2010, 16:10

saltysam wrote:Don't know what the movie will be like but be prepared to come in your pants at the sight of Natalie Portman in a thong

http://uk.ign.com/videos/2010/11/17/you ... ed-trailer

Why would I cum in my pants? First of all she barely has an ass. 2nd of all, although I like Portman as an actress and she's attractive, I really wouldn't call her sexy or whatever.

saltysam · Post by **saltysam** » 31 Dec 2010, 18:48

Yi-Long wrote:
saltysam wrote:Don't know what the movie will be like but be prepared to come in your pants at the sight of Natalie Portman in a thong

http://uk.ign.com/videos/2010/11/17/you ... ed-trailer
Why would I cum in my pants? First of all she barely has an ass. 2nd of all, although I like Portman as an actress and she's attractive, I really wouldn't call her sexy or whatever.

speak for yourself.

Yi-Long · Post by **Yi-Long** » 31 Dec 2010, 20:37

saltysam wrote:
Yi-Long wrote:
saltysam wrote:Don't know what the movie will be like but be prepared to come in your pants at the sight of Natalie Portman in a thong

http://uk.ign.com/videos/2010/11/17/you ... ed-trailer
Why would I cum in my pants? First of all she barely has an ass. 2nd of all, although I like Portman as an actress and she's attractive, I really wouldn't call her sexy or whatever.
speak for yourself.

I did, didn't I!?

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 31 Dec 2010, 21:44

I'd definately spend a month licking Portman's ass.

Film looks a bit shit though...

Yi-Long · Post by **Yi-Long** » 01 Jan 2011, 11:25

Markgway wrote:I'd definately spend a month licking Portman's ass.

Film looks a bit shit though...

What kind of fucked up diet did you decide to go on for your new rear's resolution!?

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 01 Jan 2011, 22:16

Yi-Long wrote:What kind of fucked up diet did you decide to go on for your new rear's resolution!?

The Portman Ass-licking diet. Haven't you heard of it?

grim_tales · Post by **grim_tales** » 02 Jan 2011, 15:42

Film looks a bit cheesy/shit TBH

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 02 Jan 2011, 16:34

Trailers:

SD: http://trailers.apple.com/movies/univer ... _h640w.mov
480P: http://trailers.apple.com/movies/univer ... _h480p.mov
720P: http://trailers.apple.com/movies/univer ... _h720p.mov
1080P: http://trailers.apple.com/movies/univer ... h1080p.mov

saltysam wrote:Don't know what the movie will be like but be prepared to come in your pants at the sight of Natalie Portman in a thong

There is no shot of Natalie Portman in a thong. You know what a thong is right? She is fucking hot though, what is Yi smoking?

The film looks funny but I'm confident it won't be. Very, very few American comedies are funny.

luckystars · Post by **luckystars** » 02 Jan 2011, 17:54

bradavon wrote:There is no shot of Natalie Portman in a thong.

Dude you need glasses? I saw that ass being split up the middle like a big Edam with wire through it.

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 02 Jan 2011, 19:23

Nope, still no thong. Great ass and cleavage though.

IronMonkey · Post by **IronMonkey** » 02 Jan 2011, 20:13

Brad must be watching a different trailer. Either that, or he's blind.

grim_tales · Post by **grim_tales** » 02 Jan 2011, 20:20

Definitely looks like a thong to me or thong bikini. How come we never see them over here? They ALWAYS feature in American films.

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 02 Jan 2011, 21:26

IronMonkey wrote:Brad must be watching a different trailer. Either that, or he's blind.

I think I was. I cannot fucking stand streaming bollocks trailers, so never bother. I was watching the decent quality (I can download then watch) trailer from my download link (pants, no thong). I cannot get Salty's link to work (Firefox or IE), it just asks for my DOB and the Submit does naff all. A DOB just to watch a trailer?

So I'll imagine what her ass looks like.

EDIT: I've found what I guess is the same trailer on YouTube (no DOB BS): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OD425EnZt6w. Interestingly "the" scene is identical in the trailer I posted above, except she's wearing pants instead of thong.

grim_tales wrote:Definitely looks like a thong to me or thong bikini. How come we never see them over here? They ALWAYS feature in American films.

You've never seen a bikini with thong before? Go to any warm/sunny beach during summer time.

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 03 Jan 2011, 00:25

Presumably only the R-rated trailer has 'the thong'.

luckystars · Post by **luckystars** » 03 Jan 2011, 00:30

Woa this one will be discussed in years to come like Operation Condor!

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 03 Jan 2011, 01:20

Markgway wrote:Presumably only the R-rated trailer has 'the thong'.

It must be. I guess they edited the PG-13 trailer to cut off early but then you wouldn't wear a thong and swimming pants, so who knows.

grim_tales · Post by **grim_tales** » 03 Jan 2011, 10:09

To see the R trailer, enter your birthday in the American format (month/day/year)

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 03 Jan 2011, 14:20

Of course, thanks. Why even have a date requirement? Americans are so stuck in the 1900s, worse than we are. I've seen it now anyway.

Yi-Long · Post by **Yi-Long** » 13 Jan 2011, 12:14

bradavon wrote:Of course, thanks. Why even have a date requirement? Americans are so stuck in the 1900s, worse than we are. I've seen it now anyway.

THINK OF THE CHILDREN BRAD!!! THINK OF THOSE INNOCENT CHILDREN!!!

Surely. if they happen to see a naked ass before they hit the magical age of 18, they'll be doomed!!!

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 13 Jan 2011, 15:00

Actually the trailer also has strong language.

Yi-Long · Post by **Yi-Long** » 13 Jan 2011, 19:03

Markgway wrote:Actually the trailer also has strong language.

Yeah, and if kids were locked up in basements instead of going to public school, they might never heard any of those....

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 13 Jan 2011, 19:48

Markgway wrote:Actually the trailer also has strong language.

As you know, the MPAA consider nudity far, far worse than swearing and violence.

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 13 Jan 2011, 22:13

Yi-Long wrote:
Markgway wrote:Actually the trailer also has strong language.
Yeah, and if kids were locked up in basements instead of going to public school, they might never heard any of those....

That's obviously not the point.

Yi-Long · Post by **Yi-Long** » 13 Jan 2011, 22:27

Markgway wrote:
Yi-Long wrote:
Markgway wrote:Actually the trailer also has strong language.
Yeah, and if kids were locked up in basements instead of going to public school, they might never heard any of those....
That's obviously not the point.

I think it is. All this extra inconvenience imposed on all kinds of stuff, just so we can 'protect the children' from stuff they hardly need protecting from, is just annoying, plus it won't work either.

Bullets 'n' Babes

Your Highness

Your Highness

Re: Your Highness

Re: Your Highness

Re: Your Highness

Re: Your Highness

Re: Your Highness

Re: Your Highness

Re: Your Highness

Re: Your Highness

Re: Your Highness

Re: Your Highness

Re: Your Highness

Re: Your Highness

Re: Your Highness

Re: Your Highness

Re: Your Highness

Re: Your Highness

Re: Your Highness

Re: Your Highness

Re: Your Highness

Re: Your Highness

Re: Your Highness

Re: Your Highness

Re: Your Highness

Re: Your Highness