Page 1 of 1

Guns and Talks: KubiK Vidéo (R2FR) vs R3K vs R2UK

Posted: 25 Jul 2007, 21:35
by tom2681
R2FR Top.
R3K Middle.
R2UK Bottom.

Cap 1: 0:50
Image

Image

Image

Cap 2: 2:46
Image

Image

Image

Cap 3: 3:46
Image

Image

Image

Cap 4: 14:03
Image

Image

Image

Cap 5: 17:44
Image

Image

Image

Posted: 25 Jul 2007, 23:22
by thelostdragon
Dude, you're kidding me. You're asking for a screen comparison for THIS!!! Dude, without taking caps, I can assure you that the Korean disc looks miles better than the shit you have been tricked with.

Will still take the caps if you like.

Posted: 25 Jul 2007, 23:37
by romerojpg
Some forgot to turn the focus on the camera :D that look dire, even my HK dvd seemed better than that (but that could be my mind playing tricks)

Posted: 26 Jul 2007, 01:35
by Shingster
I'll post grabs from my R2uk disc tomorrow as well

Posted: 26 Jul 2007, 10:47
by tom2681
@LD & Shing:
Yes, please.
I'd like to see which is best (R2UK or R3K).

Posted: 26 Jul 2007, 23:53
by thelostdragon
OK, sorry I'm late, but rather late than never.

Captured .bmp-files, resized with Resize with a JPEG quality of 90% of the original.

https://www.bulletsnbabesdvd.com/forums/ ... r3k.01.jpg
https://www.bulletsnbabesdvd.com/forums/ ... r3k.02.jpg
https://www.bulletsnbabesdvd.com/forums/ ... r3k.03.jpg
https://www.bulletsnbabesdvd.com/forums/ ... r3k.04.jpg
https://www.bulletsnbabesdvd.com/forums/ ... r3k.05.jpg

And wow! They don't look that much better but they're still better than the R2FR.

Posted: 27 Jul 2007, 01:18
by Shingster

Posted: 27 Jul 2007, 09:49
by tom2681
Thanks guys.
So it's the print itself that looks like shit. That's reassuring. :D

Compared to the other two, the only thing that's lacking from the R2FR is sharpness.
Not worth upgrading, then.

Oh well, thanks anyway. :)

Posted: 27 Jul 2007, 10:50
by EvaUnit02
Intentional look by the DP?

Posted: 27 Jul 2007, 11:04
by Shingster
More likely crappy over-processed, over saturated, clipped Korean masters