My first comparison: Best of the Best 2 1993 LD vs 2007 DVD
Posted: 25 Mar 2007, 08:47
Hey, this is my first comparison here, so I hope it gets the job done. It's a comparison of the 1993 Fox US NTSC Laserdisc and the 2007 Fox US NTSC DVD of Best of the Best 2. Here we go:
Compare#1:
FOX LD

FOX DVD

Compare#2:
FOX LD

FOX DVD

Compare#3:
FOX LD

FOX DVD

Compare#4:
FOX LD

FOX DVD

Compare#5:
FOX LD

FOX DVD

Compare#6:
FOX LD

FOX DVD

Compare#7:
FOX LD

FOX DVD

Compare#8:
FOX LD

FOX DVD

Compare#9:
FOX LD

FOX DVD

Well, obviously, this is a "one sided fight". However, seeing as how the LD was the only widescreen version of the film released on the home market before the DVD, it's the only worthy "competitor"... but it isn't saying much. The DVD blows the LD out of the water.
The DVD has an overall "cooler" look than the "warm" LD, and this is most obvious in the coliseum sequences.
Also, it looks as if the DVD transfer was properly supervised as different scenes have different, well, differences. Some scenes are brighter than the LD, such as compare #3 in which you can't even see Patrick Kilpatrick standing behind Wayne Newton in the LD, but he has just enough shadow in the DVD. However, some scenes are darker, such as the coliseum scenes, but also have less boosted contrast.
The contrast issue is most prominent in compare #5 in the flames. They're just a giant red glob in the LD (with a green sky to match), but the flames in the DVD look sharper and more detailed (with a proper blue sky in the background as well).
Plus, the framing changes are subtle in some shots, but seems to change more drastically in others (such as compare #4), but for the better in the case of the DVD.
Also, the DVD labels the film as "digitally restored", and this is evident in the print damage shown in the LD version on compare #7. For some reason, the shots involving the metal staffs sparking had print damage in all versions before the DVD, most likely because the sparks were added in post and the film wasn't handled properly.
Overall, the Fox DVD is most likely the best this will ever look... and I'm happy with the purchase of this cheesy semi-cult classic!
EDIT:
Completely forgot to mention that the 2007 Fox DVD features the uncut version of the film.
Basically it was originally cut by roughly 5 or so seconds, with a couple of shots of James (Sonny Landham) vomiting and then a certain character (to avoid spoilers) getting his fingers blown off in an Italian-horror-like close up (see photo below), as well as an extra shot of getting gunned down.
However, similar to the case with License to Kill, the film was sent back to the MPAA, but kept the same certificate. It should be interesting to note that when this DVD was first up for pre-order, it was labelled "unrated", most likely because Fox didn't expect the MPAA to accept the reinstated shots.

Compare#1:
FOX LD

FOX DVD

Compare#2:
FOX LD

FOX DVD

Compare#3:
FOX LD

FOX DVD

Compare#4:
FOX LD

FOX DVD

Compare#5:
FOX LD

FOX DVD

Compare#6:
FOX LD

FOX DVD

Compare#7:
FOX LD

FOX DVD

Compare#8:
FOX LD

FOX DVD

Compare#9:
FOX LD

FOX DVD

Well, obviously, this is a "one sided fight". However, seeing as how the LD was the only widescreen version of the film released on the home market before the DVD, it's the only worthy "competitor"... but it isn't saying much. The DVD blows the LD out of the water.
The DVD has an overall "cooler" look than the "warm" LD, and this is most obvious in the coliseum sequences.
Also, it looks as if the DVD transfer was properly supervised as different scenes have different, well, differences. Some scenes are brighter than the LD, such as compare #3 in which you can't even see Patrick Kilpatrick standing behind Wayne Newton in the LD, but he has just enough shadow in the DVD. However, some scenes are darker, such as the coliseum scenes, but also have less boosted contrast.
The contrast issue is most prominent in compare #5 in the flames. They're just a giant red glob in the LD (with a green sky to match), but the flames in the DVD look sharper and more detailed (with a proper blue sky in the background as well).
Plus, the framing changes are subtle in some shots, but seems to change more drastically in others (such as compare #4), but for the better in the case of the DVD.
Also, the DVD labels the film as "digitally restored", and this is evident in the print damage shown in the LD version on compare #7. For some reason, the shots involving the metal staffs sparking had print damage in all versions before the DVD, most likely because the sparks were added in post and the film wasn't handled properly.
Overall, the Fox DVD is most likely the best this will ever look... and I'm happy with the purchase of this cheesy semi-cult classic!
EDIT:
Completely forgot to mention that the 2007 Fox DVD features the uncut version of the film.
Basically it was originally cut by roughly 5 or so seconds, with a couple of shots of James (Sonny Landham) vomiting and then a certain character (to avoid spoilers) getting his fingers blown off in an Italian-horror-like close up (see photo below), as well as an extra shot of getting gunned down.
However, similar to the case with License to Kill, the film was sent back to the MPAA, but kept the same certificate. It should be interesting to note that when this DVD was first up for pre-order, it was labelled "unrated", most likely because Fox didn't expect the MPAA to accept the reinstated shots.
