Diamonds are Forever: R1 SE vs. R1 UE

Film Reviews and Release Comparisons
Post Reply
User avatar
captainjoe
King of Beggars
Posts: 667
Joined: 24 Jul 2006, 01:46
Location: Alberta, Canada

Diamonds are Forever: R1 SE vs. R1 UE

Post by captainjoe »

Image
Diamonds are Forever

Top: R1 SE
Bottom: R1 UE



Image
Image


Image
Image


Image
Image


Image
Image


Image
Image


Image
Image


Image
Image


Image
Image


Image
Image


Image
Image


Image
Image

This is a perfect restoration. DAF looks great in this crystal-clear transfer. Colours pop and are extremely robust. This is one
that will look amazing in any future high definition format. No print damage or grain.

Recommended:
UE
Last edited by captainjoe on 13 Nov 2007, 00:36, edited 4 times in total.
Image
chenlung
King of Beggars
Posts: 901
Joined: 27 Feb 2005, 22:45
Location: Scotland

Post by chenlung »

No print damage on the UE but it lacks sharpness.
Scott
saltysam
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 9357
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 19:27

Post by saltysam »

UE clear winner.
User avatar
Markgway
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 20188
Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04

Post by Markgway »

Yeah, UE is definately better.

Noticed they've cropped a smidgen off the left edge of the print on the UE to remove the white line (edge of the negative?) that's on the SE.
Image
User avatar
bradavon
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 24430
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30

Post by bradavon »

This one is weird, some shots the UE wins and others the SE (it's much sharper on a fair few, check the last capture, although I think that's actually EE).
User avatar
captainjoe
King of Beggars
Posts: 667
Joined: 24 Jul 2006, 01:46
Location: Alberta, Canada

Post by captainjoe »

This UE is one of the best looking ones. At times especially during the opening scene the detail is so very strong. Unfortunately caps fail to show just how much detail and sharpness there is in each scene.
SE (it's much sharper on a fair few, check the last capture, although I think that's actually EE).
Yeah it is EE.
Image
User avatar
bradavon
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 24430
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30

Post by bradavon »

They do show how old Connery was getting :D
chenlung
King of Beggars
Posts: 901
Joined: 27 Feb 2005, 22:45
Location: Scotland

Post by chenlung »

Markgway wrote:Noticed they've cropped a smidgen off the left edge of the print on the UE to remove the white line (edge of the negative?) that's on the SE.
Not just the left side, all sides are cropped :? !
Scott
User avatar
Markgway
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 20188
Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04

Post by Markgway »

Not so, Chen. Sometimes the UE has more info on a particular side. Look again - at the last cap for example.

I find no problems with the UE framing and think the image is so much cleaner.

I'm not a fan of the film so will likely be selling my R1 UE when it arrives.
Image
chenlung
King of Beggars
Posts: 901
Joined: 27 Feb 2005, 22:45
Location: Scotland

Post by chenlung »

Actually, you're right.

I still think the UE is soft.
Scott
User avatar
Markgway
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 20188
Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04

Post by Markgway »

Maybe? Isn't it just because they've removed the grain to make it look smoother?
Image
EvaUnit02
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 9141
Joined: 08 Feb 2005, 14:39
Location: Wellywood, Kiwiland
Contact:

Post by EvaUnit02 »

Markgway wrote:Maybe? Isn't it just because they've removed the grain to make it look smoother?
chenlung wrote:I still think the UE is soft.
Likely that the UE BRD will sport the detail that is otherwise missing from the UE DVD.
Post Reply