Film Reviews and Release Comparisons
captainjoe
King of Beggars
Posts: 667 Joined: 24 Jul 2006, 01:46
Location: Alberta, Canada
Post
by captainjoe » 01 Sep 2006, 05:12
Poltergeist
Top: Pan and Scan
Bottom: Widescreen
*both sourced from the 1997 DVD from Warner.
For a complete look at video comparisons between the original dvd and the newly remastered dvd follow this link:
https://www.bulletsnbabesdvd.com/forums/ ... php?t=4009
This really gives you a good look at what you're missing out with Pan and Scan versions.
The first one doesn't match up because I think the main title pan and scan version is from a completely different
source. You can tell because of the difference in quality and color from the widescreen one. These were taken
from the region 1 dual-sided dvd.
I didn't crop these or anything. Just shows you how much is actually missing, it's pretty bad.
Last edited by
captainjoe on 27 Oct 2007, 02:05, edited 2 times in total.
bradavon
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 24430 Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
Post
by bradavon » 07 Sep 2006, 04:18
It just goes to show how bad "pan and scanning" really is. It amazes me most people don't care.
chenlung
King of Beggars
Posts: 901 Joined: 27 Feb 2005, 22:45
Location: Scotland
Post
by chenlung » 01 Nov 2006, 14:52
Well, the first PAN/SCAN capture has more info at the bottom
.
Scott
grim_tales
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 22147 Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
Location: St. Albans, UK
Post
by grim_tales » 01 Nov 2006, 15:08
Bloody hell, thats awful. The figures in the last two shots (on the left/right) are completely missing in the pan and scan edition
captainjoe
King of Beggars
Posts: 667 Joined: 24 Jul 2006, 01:46
Location: Alberta, Canada
Post
by captainjoe » 03 Mar 2007, 23:43
Updated with matching resolution.
Barbarian King
Jade Tiger
Posts: 178 Joined: 18 Feb 2007, 13:31
Post
by Barbarian King » 04 Mar 2007, 03:03
Yeah, Poltergeist is one of the worst offenders when shown in Pan & Scan. Horrible stuff.
Can't wait for the Special Edition DVD this year!
captainjoe
King of Beggars
Posts: 667 Joined: 24 Jul 2006, 01:46
Location: Alberta, Canada
Post
by captainjoe » 04 Mar 2007, 05:29
That's gonna be a kick ass DVD if Warner plays their cards right and gives fans what they want.
Barbarian King
Jade Tiger
Posts: 178 Joined: 18 Feb 2007, 13:31
Post
by Barbarian King » 04 Mar 2007, 10:35
captainjoe wrote: That's gonna be a kick ass DVD if Warner plays their cards right and gives fans what they want.
It's Warners. I'd trust them with my first-born.
captainjoe
King of Beggars
Posts: 667 Joined: 24 Jul 2006, 01:46
Location: Alberta, Canada
Post
by captainjoe » 04 Mar 2007, 18:49
Barbarian King wrote: captainjoe wrote: That's gonna be a kick ass DVD if Warner plays their cards right and gives fans what they want.
It's Warners. I'd trust them with my first-born.
They're a great company and they treat their films with respect so I'm not doubting the quality of the set.
romerojpg
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 8520 Joined: 26 Oct 2004, 14:12
Location: CLOSE TO YOUR MAMMA
Post
by romerojpg » 04 Mar 2007, 18:52
I dont see any difference at all