French DVD is slightly cropped on the left and right, and WWC disc is slightly sharper. Both look very good IMO.
I used to be "the man who loves the movies you hate".
Now I'm just "that weird french guy with a cat avatar who comes to BnB once a year for no reason and then disappears again".
I think WWC looks slightly better, but there combing as usual (does that mean it's interlaced, aka it's the same thing?). I assume the french disc doesn't surrer from this.
BTW: The french disc has an interlaced transfer as well.
I used to be "the man who loves the movies you hate".
Now I'm just "that weird french guy with a cat avatar who comes to BnB once a year for no reason and then disappears again".
Yeah, but we'll be long dead.
You'll have to ask HungFist's great-grandson to update this comparison.
I used to be "the man who loves the movies you hate".
Now I'm just "that weird french guy with a cat avatar who comes to BnB once a year for no reason and then disappears again".
Interlaced and progressive are not related to the transfer, it's only the flagging in the DVD and player.
Not true. If the transfer comes from a video source, it will feature combing effects because video is inherently interlaced. If it is from a film source, it will be progressive (or should be - thats where the flags come in).
TH-42PX80 | DMP-BD50 (MR BD & DVD) | SA-XR55 | SB-TP20 | XBox 360 Slim 250GB | XBox (XBMC, 160GB) | Zotac XBMC HTPC | Gaming PC | 8TB Media Server
chenlung wrote:But you can carefully convert interlaced into progressive image.
The player decides about the fields (also figures out what screen you have that can handle such input).
No... You can deinterlace an interlaced picture but you're not making it progressive. Unless you have a film source and 3:2 pattern, film you do not have.