Bullets 'n' Babes

Markgway wrote:The reviews have been less than glowing

5/5 in today's Mirror empire etc all liked this. who gave it a bad review.?it's a decent movie. completely bonkers but extremely entertaining.

Empire also gave The Phantom Menace 5 out of 5

bradavon wrote:Empire also gave The Phantom Menace 5 out of 5

I haven't seen a bad review of Planet Terror anywhere,though i'm sure they are out there somewhere. it's just a stupid,entertaining movie no more,no less. most people who have seen both seem to prefer it over Death Proof. my main criticism of it would be that it's 15 minutes too long. Phantom Menace i've owned for years and still not seen. i've seen none of the new star wars films though i own them.

Revenge of the Sith is excellent and is the only one you need to see. The entire important back story is stuffed into that one. Attack of the Clones is also good but not a keeper and The Phantom Menace is a complete turkey, just woeful.

bradavon wrote:Revenge of the Sith is excellent

So did you miss all the horrendous dialogue and terrible acting?

saltysam wrote:5/5 in today's Mirror

That doesn't count. It's bog roll.

empire etc all liked this

Empire only gave Planet Terror 3-stars didn't they? And these guys suck Tarantino's knob on a regular basis.

Here's a couple...

http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/ ... 824982.ece

http://www.timeout.com/film/reviews/848 ... error.html

EvaUnit02 wrote:So did you miss all the horrendous dialogue and terrible acting?

And you reckon any of the Star Wars films have good dialogue and acting? The dialogue in the first 3 Star Wars films is equally as woeful. The great Star Wars films are far from about that.

bradavon wrote:

EvaUnit02 wrote:So did you miss all the horrendous dialogue and terrible acting?

And you reckon any of the Star Wars films have good dialogue and acting?

Good acting? Ian McDiarmid and Frank Oz.

Good acting? Ewan McGregor.

bradavon wrote:Good acting? Ewan McGregor.

See the final confrontation on the lava planet. His performance is horrible.

Markgway wrote:

saltysam wrote:5/5 in today's Mirror

That doesn't count. It's bog roll.

empire etc all liked this

Empire only gave Planet Terror 3-stars didn't they? And these guys suck Tarantino's knob on a regular basis.

i read the mirror.what exactly's wrong with it. good labour supporting paper. 3/5 in Empire is hardly a bad review and it's not really a Tarantino movie is it. Anyway reviews don't really matter, best seeing it yourself. i doubt you'll like it though.

saltysam wrote:Anyway reviews don't really matter, best seeing it yourself.

Exactly. You guys gonna decide what to watch based on some random reviews? Lol. How about watching what you're interested in?

I think the acting and dialogue in Empire Strikes Back is pretty damn good. Leigh Brackett is a fine writer. Ironically, it's the Star Wars film on which Lucas had the least creative input

HungFist wrote:

saltysam wrote:Anyway reviews don't really matter, best seeing it yourself.

Exactly. You guys gonna decide what to watch based on some random reviews? Lol. How about watching what you're interested in?

Some people are just SHEEP. Easy to spot them.

one of the worst reviewed movies ever at the time of it's cinema release in the uk was Mad Max. 20 odd years later we have on bullets a lengthy thread on the merits of the various dvd releases. Reviews count for very little. Blade Runner had crap reviews,now (almost) everyone bows down at the altar of it's supposed "greatness"

I don't know how I'll be seeing Planet Terror now. I deliberately waited to see it at the cinema and for my patience they don't go and bloody show it in my area. Thanks!

I suspect I'll end up downloading it, the DVD is out now so it should be a good rip. I'm too wary about it to buy the DVD. I rarely download but Rodriguez's film career doesn't exactly show many great films.

EvaUnit02 wrote:See the final confrontation on the lava planet. His performance is horrible.

That's not his fault he has nothing to work with. All the Star Wars films have woeful scripts and even worse dialogue but with the original Star Wars Trilogy and Revenge of the Sith it doesn't matter as the stories are so good.

Ivan Drago wrote:Ironically, it's the Star Wars film on which Lucas had the least creative input

That's no surprise. Lucas is great at creating stories but awful at filmmaking.

bradavon wrote: Lucas is great at creating stories but awful at filmmaking.

That wasn't always the case. American Graffiti and THX 1138 are both great film making. And the original Star Wars isn't bad at all.

saltysam wrote:one of the worst reviewed movies ever at the time of it's cinema release in the uk was Mad Max. 20 odd years later we have on bullets a lengthy thread on the merits of the various dvd releases. Reviews count for very little. Blade Runner had crap reviews,now (almost) everyone bows down at the altar of it's supposed "greatness"

I too have seen very little bad press about Plannet Terror, in fact never seen it get less than 3 stars out of 5 if 3 stars is bad, then god save us. The Only place I saw it get bad press was on Radio 1, but then they are the worst tossers on the planet for reviewing films sad, looser, underhand cash dealers who only knobs listen to and take in. You may as well run out and read the reviews in the Daily Sport.

Personally I thought Planet Terror was pretty much identical to From Dusk Til Dawn in style & execution, so If you like DTD you should like PT.

Good for me then, as I love FDTD

This will be the first film I have paid to see for nearly a year and a half (been using pass for a long time now, making films cost a pound or 2. Its not showing locally, so have to pay for once, £6.35p! christ! betetr be good

They really have messed up the release of Grindhouse and both seperate films, what a sad thing when this stuff happens You wait all this time to see a film in cinema, and it gets such a crap release in UK. Better be no chavs in the cinema! as I am off to see it soon, hope they are all on the streets drnkining and kicking tramps.

Is that one of those monthly passes?

I wish Odeon (my local multiplex) would have one of those deals. Not that I go to multiplex if I can help it. I usually try and avoid it at all costs. Sterile, banal, bland, lemming infested, teenager swilling coke headed, popcorn smelling, mobile phone ringing, dickheads talking place that it is.

It's only playing in 1 of the 18 cinemas near me, 6 of which are multiplexes. Screw them. I was only interested in going if it was playing in my local 2 cinemas.

The festival I saw the double bill at only did so due to a clerical error on Momentum's part. Either Momentum or Weinstein actually tried to force the organisers to cancel the screening

saltysam wrote: i read the mirror.what exactly's wrong with it.

It's shite.

good labour supporting paper.

Is that supposed to be a positive?

3/5 in Empire is hardly a bad review and it's not really a Tarantino movie is it.

No, but a Tarantino-related film would have to be an utter disaster on the level of Showgirls to get less that *** from Empire. It's a half of Grindhouse and Tarantino is in it. But then Empire loved Sin City so I should be too surprised...

Anyway reviews don't really matter, best seeing it yourself. i doubt you'll like it though.

Probably not, but I'm willing to be proven wrong.

Shingster wrote:Personally I thought Planet Terror was pretty much identical to From Dusk Til Dawn in style & execution, so If you like DTD you should like PT.

I didn't.