Bullets 'n' Babes

BOGOF = Buy One, Get One Free.

LOL Eva knows.

Gusy check out the updated DVD Times Spec. list:

http://www.dvdtimes.co.uk/content.php?contentid=61675

It confirms DTS & DD5.1 only (No Mono or Stereo AT ALL) and also lists the extras in a fashion so it's easy to see what's new and what's old.

Now DTS has definitely been confirmed for GE, TND and TWINE (+ ALL uncut too) I'm definitely upgrading. Even if they aren't really Remastered it will be worth it.

Time to eBay me thinks.

Markgway wrote:£15.99 a cheap RRP? You have too much money Brad.

As AN RRP well yes, most RRPs are £19.99

TWINE was always uncut. LTK is not confirmed as an "uncut presentation" but I'm sure it is.
Will surely upgrade what I have though Even GE and TND (they might be the same footage wise as the DVDs I have but still).

http://www.mi6.co.uk/news/index.php?itemid=3726

Found this on a Bond site, but I doubt this will affect the DVD releases.

As AN RRP well yes, most RRPs are £19.99

Not so much these days....

grim_tales wrote:TWINE was always uncut.

I know that and you knew I know that. I didn't say it was cut either???

MLAM wrote:http://www.mi6.co.uk/news/index.php?itemid=3726

Found this on a Bond site, but I doubt this will affect the DVD releases.

So in lamens terms MGM's back catalogue is now being distrusted by Fox?

What about all the Sony re-releases? Does this mean they're still owned by Sony or are now owned by Fox or even MGM again? Or did they belong to MGM all along.

Why can't MGM distribute their own catalogue like everyone else? A year and a change already, what???

MLAM wrote:http://www.mi6.co.uk/news/index.php?itemid=3726

Found this on a Bond site, but I doubt this will affect the DVD releases.

Cheers for that.

bradavon wrote:So in lamens terms MGM's back catalogue is now being distrusted by Fox?

More like ENtrusted to Fox. This is excellent news, cuz Sony neglect their classic catalogue. Fox on the other hand release their classics on a regular basis and threat them like royalty. Now, if only someone like Warner or Fox could handle the Columbia & Tristar libraries.

What about all the Sony re-releases? Does this mean they're still owned by Sony or are now owned by Fox or even MGM again? Or did they belong to MGM all along.

Sony/MGM (same thing) own the films, the home entertainment licence is held by Fox, so they own the DVDs/HD-whatevers they produce including any extras they have produced. No different than what Criterion does really.

Why can't MGM distribute their own catalogue like everyone else? A year and a change already, what???

Meh.

So Sony still actually own MGM then?

No different than what Criterion does really.

Ah the penny has dropped, they sub-license.

High Res. Front and Rear cover art is up at DVD Active CONFIRMING they all have DD5.1 and DTS but NO other audio options:

http://www.dvdactive.com/news/releases/ ... tions.html

Including my favourite cover of them all:



. Why don't all women have legs like her? 8)

bradavon wrote:High Res. Front and Rear cover art is up at DVD Active CONFIRMING they all have DD5.1 and DTS but NO other audio options:

http://www.dvdactive.com/news/releases/ ... tions.html

Including my favourite cover of them all:



. Why don't all women have legs like her? 8)

Not all women has a personal graphic designer photoshopping for them

THAT's you favourite Bond cover???

I like the cover that was used for the Xbox/PS2 game From Russia With Love, the sketched one, the most. Awesome cool sketch of Connery.

It was also used for a movie poster.[/img]

Not all women has a personal graphic designer photoshopping for them Wink.

, well true but they still look awesome.

THAT's you favourite Bond cover???

Of the new ones yes.

bradavon wrote:Why don't all women have legs like her? 8)

That's Roger Moore!

Interesting to note that the packaging claims 1.66 anamorphic for the first three films whereas the previous releases were matted to 1.78. Orignal aspect ratio for the first time on DVD. The old VHS releases were also a correct 1.66.

MGM used to release all 1.66:1 titles as non-anamorphic

Cool, it's unsual for big studios to go near 1.66:1. So they'll be uncropped for the first time too? It's a pity they've not got Mono to make it really definitive.

1.66:1 was the British ratio, it was common for them to be matted to 1.85:1 in America so they were shot to accomodate that. Either ways fine but 1.66:1 is slightly preferable

Right, the Hammer movies of the 50's and 60's were also 1.66, which means some of the 1.78 or 1.85 transfers are tightly matted. Apparently the Warners releases are particularly bad for this. I don't think the 70's films were 1.66, but rather 1.85. Not certain, though.

Ivan Drago wrote:MGM used to release all 1.66:1 titles as non-anamorphic

... except the ones they matted for 16:9

But The Hound of the Baskervilles is an example of what you're talking about.

Which was the film where James Bond finally gets married, but then his wife is killed in a car bombing or something?

bradavon wrote:Ah the penny has dropped, they sub-license.

Huh? So what is your revelation?

Penny has Dropped
<colloquial expression>

If the "penny has dropped" it means someone has finally realised the situation they are in after possibly being unaware of it for a long time, depending on the situation.

==> The phrase dates back to the Victorian Era and the popular penny-slot arcades. The penny would often stick halfway down the slot and the user would then have to either wait, or give the machine a thump before the 'penny finally dropped' and they could begin playing.

Never heard that one before.

Markgway wrote:Right, the Hammer movies of the 50's and 60's were also 1.66, which means some of the 1.78 or 1.85 transfers are tightly matted. Apparently the Warners releases are particularly bad for this. I don't think the 70's films were 1.66, but rather 1.85. Not certain, though.

Actually, a typical US release would look fine matted. What went wrong with the inital three Warner Hammers is that they framed them wrong, taking too much of the top off whilst showing more of the bottom. It wasn't an even matte

EvaUnit02 wrote:Which was the film where James Bond finally gets married, but then his wife is killed in a car bombing or something?

SPOILER

That was On Her Majesty's Secret Service and it was a shooting, not a bombing

Ta Ivan. Is that Timothy Dalton or George Lazenby one?

EDIT:
Ah, the George Lazenby one. I didn't know that Dalton was in more than one Bond film.

Interesting that A View To A Kill is rated "12" is that for the extras?
I might up "From Russia With Love" as well as the upgrades of Goldfinger and You Only Live Twice for the early films. Live and Let Die is a classic and Man With the Golden Gun is good fun.
Even though "LTK" will be uncut, strange that its not mentioned on the packaging but TND and Goldeneye are??? Uncut 15's (for GE/TND) seem a bit harsh, no? I can understand it for LTK.

grim_tales wrote: Uncut 15's (for GE/TND) seem a bit harsh, no? I can understand it for LTK.

Who cares? Unless you're under 15 and wanting to buy the DVDs that is.