Page 3 of 5

Posted: 13 Mar 2008, 09:39
by bradavon
That's shocking. It sounds unwatchable. I'd prefer a law was passed banning smoking in films than allowing it but then censoring it out anyway. Where is the logic in that?

I hope Film makers stop showing smoking in their films. What a dumb rule! They allow smoking anywhere you like in bars etc... but not movies.

Do Mangpong censor their DVDs ever? Thanks btw.

Posted: 13 Mar 2008, 09:59
by Ricochan38
bradavon wrote:That's shocking. It sounds unwatchable. I'd prefer a law was passed banning smoking in films than allowing it but then censoring it out anyway. Where is the logic in that?

I hope Film makers stop showing smoking in their films. What a dumb rule! They allow smoking anywhere you like in bars etc... but not movies.

Do Mangpong censor their DVDs ever? Thanks btw.

Actually they will ban smoking from bars here in holland also next year and i think in england also, so then you wil have to smoke outside on the street.

Posted: 13 Mar 2008, 10:04
by bradavon
We're talking about Thailand though ;)

It's already banned in the UK. The first stage was Scotland in the Summer of 2006 and the ban came into full force in Summer 2007 in England and Wales. In California you're not even allowed to smoke in the street. I think that is too far.

Do Mangpong censor their DVDs ever? Please don't make ask a third time :D

Posted: 13 Mar 2008, 10:09
by Ricochan38
khor tot / sorry

I think they censor sometimes but i am not 100% sure why they do it sometimes and other times not, thats why i didnt answer it :wink:

Posted: 13 Mar 2008, 10:23
by bradavon
Thank you. I was asking as they seem to be the biggest, so of most importance to me.

See if you can work this one out :D -

Hong Nam U Tee Ni Krup

I'm spelling it phonetically (as if they were English words). I've no idea how Thais spell it with Romanic letters. It's the only unusual sentence I know, it can come in very handy though.

Posted: 13 Mar 2008, 10:43
by Ricochan38
I speak a bit thai ( i go there usually 2 times per year, also because my wife is thai) so she likes to go back also whenever we can, I am still learning every day but if i have to guess what you are saying i think it is;

do you know where the toilet is ? :D

Posted: 13 Mar 2008, 20:09
by bradavon
Very good :D

I only know a few choice phrases, that is a handy one. I don't have the luxury of a Thai lady to help me out 8)

Posted: 16 Mar 2008, 06:54
by bradavon
I don't think this has been posted: Chocolate BKK Premier:

http://www.dragondynasty.com/blog/show/77
The film definitely delivers in the action stakes, and I’d go on record as saying it has the most satisfying fight sequences of any Thai actioner since Born To Fight (also out on Dragon Dynasty, naturally!). As mentioned above, Jeeja suffered for her art, and the film features end credit outtakes of Jackie Chan proportions.

Posted: 24 Mar 2008, 13:10
by chenlung
Cine-Asia picked up the UK rights for this.

Posted: 25 Mar 2008, 02:34
by bradavon
Thanks.

What other DVDs have they put out? What's their track record?

Posted: 25 Mar 2008, 03:25
by chenlung
bradavon wrote:What other DVDs have they put out? What's their track record?
See here (http://kungfucinema.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5019).

Posted: 25 Mar 2008, 03:53
by bradavon
Thanks. I imagine the DD will be better but Cine-Asia will hopefully give us a 2 Disc SE too.

Interesting:
Another interesting thing is that they also had trailers for other Premier Asia / Contender titles..are these companies linked or did Cine Asia / Showbox buy them out?
I wonder if Contender sold some of their titles to Showbox.

Posted: 19 Apr 2008, 09:37
by Godzooki
DVD up for pre-order

Dear our valued customer,

This is new release product which we think that you will like it.

Thai movie - Chocolate [ Release Date : 23 April 2008 ]

Starring Yanin Vismitananda, Ammara Siripong, Pongpat Wachirabunjong,
Hiroshi Abe.

Director : Pruchya Pinkeaw

[ VCD ]

http://www.ethaicd.com/show.php?pid=38355

[ DVD ]

http://www.ethaicd.com/show.php?pid=38356


Best regards,
eThaiCD.com Team

Posted: 19 Apr 2008, 09:42
by Godzooki
Oh btw i watched this movie the other night there (subbed too) and it kinda stunk. Action is A1 :) but the rest is quite boring. :|

Jeeja is technically a different screenfighter to Jaa which is no bad thing, she is less acrobatic and more grounded however the dissapointing thing is when you notice all of her flashier moves have been done with the assistance of wires! :roll:

Posted: 19 Apr 2008, 11:01
by Yi-Long
The trailers said 'no wires' I believe!? At least it said 'no doubles' Not sure about the 'no wires' stuff.

But no english subs, which sadly was to be expected. :( Bastards.

Posted: 19 Apr 2008, 15:02
by sky75
Yi-Long wrote:
But no english subs, which sadly was to be expected. :( Bastards.
That's a shame! :(

Posted: 19 Apr 2008, 17:56
by bradavon
No subs, bugger! Thanks Tiger.

I've never minded wires, although no wires is better. Of all the Martial Arts films coming out I was looking forward to this one mostly.

Posted: 21 Apr 2008, 12:08
by Ricochan38
Tigercage wrote:Oh btw i watched this movie the other night there (subbed too) and it kinda stunk. Action is A1 :) but the rest is quite boring. :|

Jeeja is technically a different screenfighter to Jaa which is no bad thing, she is less acrobatic and more grounded however the dissapointing thing is when you notice all of her flashier moves have been done with the assistance of wires! :roll:
so whats your point ? every HK movie + action stars use wires so why cant she do that...

Posted: 21 Apr 2008, 13:10
by bradavon
I think it was at least implied they wouldn't be using wires. I can understand some are disappointed.

Posted: 21 Apr 2008, 18:20
by Godzooki
Ricochan38 wrote:
Tigercage wrote:Oh btw i watched this movie the other night there (subbed too) and it kinda stunk. Action is A1 :) but the rest is quite boring. :|

Jeeja is technically a different screenfighter to Jaa which is no bad thing, she is less acrobatic and more grounded however the dissapointing thing is when you notice all of her flashier moves have been done with the assistance of wires! :roll:
so whats your point ? every HK movie + action stars use wires so why cant she do that...
???? Rico WTF!! You have answered your own question.
every HK movie + action stars use wires so why cant she do that.
Its a thai action movie from a stable of screen fighters/talent which rasied the bar in terms of fight choreography worldwide through thier lack of wire work and thier focus on sheer mind boggling physical ability.

I have already said the action is A1 and she is extremely talented and different to Jaa (which is no bad thing as i am quite frankly bored of him) but i was dissapointed at some obvious wirework as the fact of the matter is she could have done the moves without it and it was just for artistic slo mo effect!!

Posted: 22 Apr 2008, 09:44
by Ricochan38
How can you be bored with tony jaa after 2 movies ( i dont count the ones before ong bak and i also dont count the bodyguard)

I am personally glad he is out there so i dont have to watch donnie yen (who always does the same things) every time i want to see a fight flick..
At least tony tries to do new moves every time, thats why i have high hopes for ong bak 2.

Posted: 22 Apr 2008, 10:05
by Yi-Long
Same here. I love Tony Jaa. He's nr. 1 as far as action is concerned.
Donnie Yen can suck my balls, he's been in the business for almost 25-30 years now and he has only made about 5-10 decent movies. Some great.

Posted: 22 Apr 2008, 17:35
by bradavon
I'm bored of Tony Jaa after one movie :D, ironically I do have TYG in my "to watch" pile soon. I figure I shouldn't write him off after only one movie.

Donnie Yen is way more exciting to watch. Agreed though Yi Donnie should've made more great movies.

Sure Tony has the moves (not that I found them "that" exciting) but Ong-Bak anyway has utterly no story or plot to go with it. Like many Jackie Chan moves I do wonder why these bother to make a film (which brings with it those boring elements such as plot and story) and not just make a stunt documentary. That would be a more suitable avenue.

Posted: 22 Apr 2008, 19:10
by Godzooki
bradavon wrote:I'm bored of Tony Jaa

Donnie Yen is way more exciting to watch. Agreed though Yi Donnie should've made more great movies.
Holy shit, Tigercage in agreement with Bradavon shocker!! :wink:


How can you be bored with tony jaa after 2 movies
Eh? Its only my opinion and im entitled to it.

Hate repeating myself but i felt Ong Bak, Tony Jaa & Panna Rittikrai collectively raised the bar in terms of fight choreography and the technical execution of stunts worldwide. It was a case of move over HK and the rest of the world...this is how its done. :)

Post Ong Bak the same team involved released Tom Yum Goong which although i absolutely love action wise i feel it's was a little repetative and aside from a higher calibre of opponent Jaa showed nothing more to me.

Since then Panna Rittikrai and others closely involved have punted out stuff like mercury man, tabunfire, brave, Muay Thai Chia and now chocolate. They have also promoted newcomers Alan B, Dan Chupong and now Jeeja as the next Tony Jaa. I believe none of them can match his on screen ability and that all those films are steaming turds. :roll:

I think in SPL Donnie Yen not only re-invinted himself again but him Sammo and Wu jing rasied the bar in terms of action choreography and has remained consistent in terms of his action scenes in Flashpoint in adding something new again.

Everything i have seen from Ong Bak 2 in terms of the casting of Jaa's opponents (Tim Man etc) indicate we will see him come up against and even higher caliber of opponent than Tom Yum Goong, this makes my cockles warm but i hope Jaa rasies the bar again in terms of what he does best as i have him trailing Donnie Yen on my current scorecard!!

Posted: 17 May 2008, 11:23
by HungFist