Page 182 of 325

Posted: 09 Mar 2007, 23:34
by Markgway
Knetan wrote:Long Arm Of The Law Saga II - 2.5/5

Very much inferior to Johnny Mak's original classic
I thought this sequel was much better than the overrated original and the best entry in the trilogy. There was a fourth installment called Underground Express which I haven't seen.

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 00:02
by Knetan
hey,
I thought this sequel was much better than the overrated original
Shocker! :D

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 04:47
by captainjoe
300: 3/5

Interesting visuals. Enjoyable.

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 08:53
by grim_tales
The Warrior (Hindi movie) - 4/5

Very good film IMO. Feels a bit slow moving at times even though its only 80 minutes long - however excellent performances and cinematography :)
I'm not sure what AR the film is - the box it claims it's anamorphic 2.35/1 but it looks like they've done an old MIHK trick of cropboxing (?) the image, there's a huge black bar over the bottom where Film Four have put their subs.

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 14:01
by BiscLimpkit
Borat 4/5
Hilarious yet cringe worthy!

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 14:16
by grim_tales
Aye Bisc what score did you give The Warrior? :)

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 14:22
by Markgway
Knetan wrote:hey,
I thought this sequel was much better than the overrated original
Shocker! :D
You expected me to say that? :|

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 14:34
by BiscLimpkit
grim_tales wrote:Aye Bisc what score did you give The Warrior? :)
Canne mind... 3.5 maybe?

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 14:36
by grim_tales
Fair enough.

Canne mind? :? Can't remember?

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 14:52
by BiscLimpkit
Correct.

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 15:16
by grim_tales
:D
Thanks.

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 17:03
by BiscLimpkit
Domino 3.25/5

Not Scott's best but entertaining enough. Gave me a headache though.

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 18:32
by romerojpg
You should have seen it in the cinema! it made me go blind for a few days :D

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 18:58
by Markgway
romerojpg wrote:You should have seen it in the cinema! it made me go blind for a few days :D
Well, you shouldn't wank in a cinema! :wink:

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 19:04
by grim_tales
:lol:

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 19:11
by romerojpg
I didnt, I was too busy watching evreyone else wank :D they were all ladies.

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 19:49
by Barbarian King
300 - 5/5

FUCK YEAH! :D

Big Trouble in Little China - 5/5

"It's all in the reflexes."

Posted: 10 Mar 2007, 19:58
by RickyTheDragonSteamboat
Belly of The Beast - 3/5
Better than I was expecting.

Posted: 11 Mar 2007, 00:08
by Markgway
Barbarian King wrote:Big Trouble in Little China - 5/5

"It's all in the reflexes."
Apparently Maxim voted this the worst film ever.

Arses.

Posted: 11 Mar 2007, 00:12
by slasher13
Markgway wrote:
Barbarian King wrote:Big Trouble in Little China - 5/5

"It's all in the reflexes."
Apparently Maxim voted this the worst film ever.

Arses.
I read this as well, I can't believe they would say this is the worst film, I absolutely love this film, its great. Don't know what they was smoking..

Posted: 11 Mar 2007, 02:38
by Barbarian King
Markgway wrote:
Barbarian King wrote:Big Trouble in Little China - 5/5

"It's all in the reflexes."
Apparently Maxim voted this the worst film ever.

Arses.
Yeah. They also had They Live on that list.

They're idiots.

Of course it was one of those "so good it's bad" type of lists, but still.

Posted: 11 Mar 2007, 09:20
by grim_tales
You mean so bad it's good? ;) That's the expression.

Posted: 11 Mar 2007, 11:22
by Barbarian King
grim_tales wrote:You mean so bad it's good? ;) That's the expression.
DOH!

Yeah...

Posted: 11 Mar 2007, 12:18
by BiscLimpkit
:lol:

Can't wait for 300 now. Cheers BK.

How the hell did you see this so early hmm?

Posted: 11 Mar 2007, 13:32
by Knetan
hey,

Shaolin Vs Evil Dead 2.5/5

The hopping vampires are back and made by someone who has the same soft spot for the genre as many of us do. Production company My Way and Douglas Kung's effort looks a bit tired compared to the entire genre but making one of these flicks at this time means points scored already. A but uneven overall and cheap, there are a few scenarios that combine the energy of past vampire/ghost busting with today's CGI used to only average effect. Meaning the 80s and 90s meet up quite nicely with the new millenium. They could've used tigether pace and energy to the action but it's quite allright and hopefully something that'll be developed in the as of yet released direct sequel. The showreel during the end credits sure look good.