Page 18 of 36
Posted: 19 Dec 2006, 16:43
by degeneration
Posted: 19 Dec 2006, 17:02
by grim_tales
Not working for me
If you (not you personally Degen

) don't think Salma is smokin' hot in From Dusk Til Dawn then you are dead, no other explanation

Posted: 19 Dec 2006, 20:49
by bradavon
LOL you're right Grim.
Those scenes seriously aren't sexy and not remotely erotic. Maybe the first one is I can't remember it BUT
The second one in the scene she is in LOTS of pain so it's pretty pathetic really some sad geeky faced teen would get a hard on over them (not you btw Degeneration, just generally speaking).
Oh and Frida is a magnificent film (the cinematogrpaphy especially), easily Salma's best film. She's really good in it.
What does NSFW mean?
EvaUnit02 wrote:Mad About You was one of the worst sitcoms of all time and we don't need to be reminded of it.
Personally I liked it.
Oh and Scartlett is one hell of an actresses, or at least was.
HungFist wrote:I don't like sexy women

You will

Posted: 19 Dec 2006, 22:32
by grim_tales
NSFW = Not Safe For Work I presume??
They don't work for me. All I get is a small banner.
Posted: 19 Dec 2006, 22:49
by bradavon
Thanks
Try these:
https://www.bulletsnbabesdvd.com/forums/ ... tFrida.jpg
https://www.bulletsnbabesdvd.com/forums/ ... rida-2.jpg
All that stuff on Frida's body in the second picture is some kind of cast to help protect her back (I forget exactly). I can't say any more as it would hurt the film.
Posted: 20 Dec 2006, 03:38
by Markgway
Can't really think of any. Just women who I liked in some certain photo or movie (Meg Tilly in Psycho II, for example). I rarely like any non-asian woman only because of her looks, that's why movies work better for me.
Doesn't count as she's half-Chinese.

Posted: 20 Dec 2006, 13:16
by HungFist
She is? Well, that explains it all. I Was wondering how an american girl could look so cute

Posted: 20 Dec 2006, 13:35
by EvaUnit02
bradavon wrote:EvaUnit02 wrote:Mad About You was one of the worst sitcoms of all time and we don't need to be reminded of it.
Personally I liked it.
It was the most unfunny sitcom ever. Why it was on air for so long is a mystery.
Oh and Scartlett is one hell of an actresses, or at least was.
Was? What films are you talking about? That Michael Bay movie doesn't count, as she probably just did it for the money and/or exposure (she's not as popular in USA as she is internationally).
Posted: 20 Dec 2006, 14:16
by grim_tales
Lost In Translation?
Posted: 20 Dec 2006, 16:46
by degeneration
bradavon wrote:some sad geeky faced teen would get a hard on over them (not you btw Degeneration, just generally speaking).
grim_tales wrote:
If you (not you personally Degen

) don't think Salma is smokin' hot in From Dusk Til Dawn then you are dead, no other explanation

Woah!! lots of people here thinking I'm gonna be talking things personally!! have I been moody or something recently!!!

It is that time of the month I guess...
Yes, she was sexy in FDTD. I think she's hot. In those pics, they may not be erotic or whatever, but she's got her tits out, which generally makes them better pictures than ones with her tits in.
And yeah, looking specifically at the scene where she's in pain - that is when you take the whole thing in context. To people who may not have seen the film, it is just an image of Salma with her breasts out, but rather dusty/dirty... But you've also gotta question - if it wasn't for the chance to show Salma's tits on screen and to appeal to people interested in that prospect, why did they have to focus on her breasts for the cast removal scene? The whole thing could have been done just as well, WITHOUT the camera staring straight at her bare chest. Showing her tits there was completely gratuitous, so while it may have been pathetic for some sad spotty geek (or whatever it was you said) to get a hardon from that scene, why else was it filmed how it was?
Posted: 20 Dec 2006, 19:15
by bradavon
EvaUnit02 wrote:Personally I liked it.
It was the most unfunny sitcom ever. Why it was on air for so long is a mystery.[/quote]
Seinfeld managed stacks of dull seasons.
Was? What films are you talking about? That Michael Bay movie doesn't count, as she probably just did it for the money and/or exposure (she's not as popular in USA as she is internationally).
Ghost World, Lost in Translation (in particular) and Girl with a Pearl Earring. I'm sure she still is good but those she was so excellent it's such a high point to get back to.
I really meant she's not done anything of note (in comparison) since those. I've not seen The Black Dahlia, she was good in The Prestige but her performance wasn't close to the above.
degeneration wrote:In those pics, they may not be erotic or whatever, but she's got her tits out, which generally makes them better pictures than ones with her tits in.
Out of context yes but as I've seen the film very much not (for me anyway). I just remember the scene and it's no longer fun.
degeneration wrote:why did they have to focus on her breasts for the cast removal scene?
I've no idea but artistically it seemed to work and like the hoo-harr when Halle Berry got her breasts out in Swordfish it wasn't remotely erotic so rather bland really (in a ow she has her breasts out way)
degeneration wrote:The whole thing could have been done just as well, WITHOUT the camera staring straight at her bare chest. Showing her tits there was completely gratuitous, so while it may have been pathetic for some sad spotty geek (or whatever it was you said) to get a hardon from that scene, why else was it filmed how it was?
Frida was very much a pet project of Salma Hayek's so no doubt she had lots of say and was happy with it.
They sure as hell didn't do it for some geeky kid to see it as there's no way such a kid would sit through Frida.
Posted: 23 Dec 2006, 16:28
by EvaUnit02
Posted: 23 Dec 2006, 17:25
by bradavon
Sure she's hot but doesn't do much for me. Blondes rarely do.
Posted: 23 Dec 2006, 18:24
by HungFist
Probably best if I don't say what I think of her. I don't want to hurt anyone's feelings

Posted: 23 Dec 2006, 18:45
by bradavon
She's a tenth Asian does it help?

(NOT!)
Posted: 23 Dec 2006, 20:02
by HungFist
bradavon wrote:She's a tenth Asian does it help?

(NOT!)
no
But seriously, I don't have anything against non-asian women. I like pretty girls. It's not my fault they all happen to be asian

Posted: 23 Dec 2006, 20:14
by bradavon
AKA You're looking through Asian tinted glasses

Posted: 23 Dec 2006, 20:55
by Yi-Long
For me, I am just not that attracted to BLONDES. Brunettes, black women, asian women, latin women, etc etc are all fine though

Posted: 23 Dec 2006, 21:53
by grim_tales
Brad did you see The Girl Next Door last night?
I watched a bit of it, a pool scene and then Elisha Cuthbert in a tight shirt/crop top thing

She was hot

Posted: 23 Dec 2006, 23:33
by Markgway
I saw that on TV last night........ and GOD YEAH, that chick was really something.
Posted: 24 Dec 2006, 00:11
by bradavon
Yi-Long wrote:For me, I am just not that attracted to BLONDES. Brunettes, black women, asian women, latin women, etc etc are all fine though

Funnily enough my thoughts exactly. Some Blondes are okay such as Scarlett Johansen but that's more because she has brains.
My Mum has joked she'd find it funny if I ever went out with someone who is blonde.
grim_tales wrote:Brad did you see The Girl Next Door next night?
I watched a bit of it, a pool scene and then Elisha Cuthbert in a tight shirt/crop top thing

She was hot

Last night you mean?
Funnily enough yes I did. I didn't mean to but ended up seeing it. It was better than I was expecting but also nothing like your usual teen film at all.
It didn't have a clue what type of film it wanted to be. One minute a teen comedy, the next violent (when he got hit in the face that was extreme), then an unusual amount of swearing, then porn but not really porn, 15 rated porn.
Overall it was better than expected but also a complete mess in places (it would've worked better 18 rated). Oh and yes Elisha Cuthbert is incredibly hot, if nothing at all in the slightest way like a porn star.
Posted: 24 Dec 2006, 01:34
by EvaUnit02
bradavon wrote:It didn't have a clue what type of film it wanted to be. One minute a teen comedy, the next violent (when he got hit in the face that was extreme), then an unusual amount of swearing, then porn but not really porn, 15 rated porn.
Nah, it's a wank flick for 13-year-old boys.
Posted: 24 Dec 2006, 14:25
by grim_tales
Last night yeah

LOL I don't know why I typed it like that

Posted: 03 Jan 2007, 19:53
by bradavon
Posted: 03 Jan 2007, 20:26
by grim_tales
Who are they?