Page 16 of 16
Posted: 29 Apr 2008, 20:00
by chenlung
What ratio is that Hung?
It's not on 'Fixed Pixel Ratio', but I still don't know about 720x
540.
It's not how Fearless would look on a 4:3 TV when the DVD Player is set to 16:9 Enhanced. The black bars for one are too big.
It is how it looks on a 4:3 TV that way because the ratio is scope (2:35:1). It would have no black bars if the ratio was 1:78:1.
How do you mean?
On a CRT monitor, you can squish the image down to it's correct ratio as opposed to outputting at square pixels which loses quality.
Posted: 29 Apr 2008, 20:17
by bradavon
The 2.35:1 black bars are much thinner, as you say they're there but they're not that fat.
Thanks for the other info.
Posted: 29 Apr 2008, 21:07
by tom2681
Do you guys want me to split this thread in two?
You can have "Fearless" on one side and "random aspect ratio discussion" on the other.
That's only if you have more things to say on the subject.
Posted: 29 Apr 2008, 21:38
by bradavon
I don't.
Posted: 29 Apr 2008, 21:43
by Killer Meteor
good, then lets end this nonsense
Posted: 29 Apr 2008, 22:30
by chenlung
I wasn't one to talk last week, but there seems to be a bit of hostility going on at the forum

.
Posted: 29 Apr 2008, 22:38
by Killer Meteor
Nah, just The People vs Our Former Mod
Posted: 29 Apr 2008, 23:23
by bradavon
chenlung wrote:but there seems to be a bit of hostility going on at the forum

.
Compared to how it has been, this is nothing. Seriously it's just a healthy debate. No "real" hostility.
Ivan Drago wrote:Nah, just The People vs Our Former Mod
That would be "person x2 vs. our former mod"

Posted: 30 Apr 2008, 00:42
by chenlung
Na, it was a few other forum members too.
Posted: 30 Apr 2008, 00:55
by bradavon
It was, but it's now only 2-3

.
Posted: 30 Apr 2008, 08:41
by grim_tales
Brad, yeah I mean 16/9 on a W/S TV.
I think when I tried 16/9 on a 4/3 TV everything looked "stretched".
Posted: 30 Apr 2008, 17:14
by bradavon
It is stretched but then on a small TV in particular it's hard to work out what's going on with such huge black bars. There is no decent way to display WS on a 4:3 TV.
Thanks for bringing it all up again too Grim

Posted: 30 Apr 2008, 17:32
by Killer Meteor
You could get a bigger 4:3 set
Posted: 30 Apr 2008, 18:02
by HungFist
Why not use binoculars?

Posted: 30 Apr 2008, 18:16
by bradavon
Have Edko Hong Kong released on BD yet?
I don't think they have but a Fearless DC BD would be good.
Posted: 02 May 2008, 11:43
by chenlung
bradavon wrote:Have Edko Hong Kong released on BD yet?
I don't think they have but a Fearless DC BD would be good.
I don't know if Edko have released anything on BD.
If they fixed their subtitles (grammar and proper sentencing etc), they would be worthy of a purchase in my eyes.
Posted: 02 May 2008, 15:58
by bradavon
Thanks Chen.
I'd buy an Edko Fearless DC BD even with the same subs. I've don't recall any major problems.
Posted: 14 Jul 2008, 19:22
by saltysam
Saw this posted over at Kung fu Cinema,what a fuck up by universal
‘Fearless’ Director’s Cut ships with defective disc
By Mark Pollard • July 11, 2008
It has been confirmed that JET LI’S FEARLESS: DIRECTOR’S CUT, Universal’s highly anticipated re-release of Ronny Yu’s Huo Yuanjia biopic promising nearly 40 minutes of additional footage is missing the director’s cut. Released July 8th, it promised three versions of the movie, one of which was supposed to be the complete two hour and 21 minute director’s cut. However, upon inspecting the two-disc release purchased from Walmart today both discs contain only 103-minute international and theatrical versions. Other readers have been e-mailing and posting messages on this site stating the same problem which suggests this defect is widespread.
Additionally, both discs appear to function erratically in my player. Disc two displays nothing but pixels and disc one periodically will not start up. I was only able to confirm the contents of disc two by using a disc burning tool. Both discs appear to be identical and the director’s cut is no where to be found despite what the back cover clearly states.
Universal was unavailable for comment at the time of writing and an e-mail sent Thursday has so far gone unanswered.
At this point I would suggest that anyone who is considering buying this release to not do so until Universal releases corrected discs and issues a statement, preferably along with a recall.
For those who have already purchased the defective FEARLESS discs and are unable to return them to the store, try contacting Universal direct during normal, weekday business hours. You may also want to notify your local retailer.
Posted: 14 Jul 2008, 20:08
by bradavon
Numpties!
No doubt they'll fix this asap.
Posted: 15 Jul 2008, 15:44
by EvaUnit02
bradavon wrote:Numpties!
No doubt they'll fix this asap.
Yeah, just like how they fixed R2/R4 Blues Brothers 2-disc SE that was supposed to have both the TC and Extended cut, but instead featured the Extended cut on both discs. Oh wait, they never did anything about that.
Posted: 15 Jul 2008, 17:06
by Markgway
The UK 2-disc had the TC on it.
Posted: 15 Jul 2008, 17:28
by bradavon
I didn't know that. That's shocking. They usually fix these cock ups.
Posted: 15 Jul 2008, 18:12
by Killer Meteor
And they never fixed those numerous DVD-18 sets like The Bela Lugosi, Hammer, Invisible Man etc sets, which had numerous playback problems on many sets