Bullets 'n' Babes

Juri Ueno

I like the one with the umbrella. She has a wholesome cuteness

grim_tales wrote:She has a wholesome cuteness

Really? I hadn't noticed. It's not like they're going for that look after all .

Specs can be sexy.

Once this was a quality thread with lots of pics with half-naked asian babes. Now it's a thread about teenage girls wearing glasses.

I really dont think I have to make a snappy comment about this, do I!?

Please go to the caucasian beasts thread, or start a shaved asian porn sluts thread. I don't like you polluting this thread. Thank you.

I dont care much for caucasians. I love asian girls, but I do prefer them a LITTLE sexier than the chicks posted here the last few pages. I dont MIND them, obviously, but when you click this thread, you're usually hoping to stare into some breasts, and not into some shy smiling teen's face that makes you feel like a perverted paedophile...

Well, the thread is called "nice asian birds" rather than "sexy chicks". Of course I could start a thread of my own and you guys continue here.

And sorry about my previous post. I was a bit out of line.

No one is saying that these girls aren't pretty... just that they're perhaps a bit too ordinary to warrant posting in a "babes" thread.

HungFist wrote:Please go to the caucasian beasts thread, or start a shaved asian porn sluts thread.

I agree with the sentiment of your post but disagree that the Western Babes thread is in anyway different. It has plenty of clothed women. We can post clothed and unclothed photos of ladies in either thread. If Yi wants to see some naked asian ladies, he should be posting some.

Did you really mean beasts? I know you're not a fan but to call them beasts is a bit extreme .

Markgway wrote:No one is saying that these girls aren't pretty... just that they're perhaps a bit too ordinary to warrant posting in a "babes" thread.

Agreed. It takes all sorts.

If you disagree with Hung's tastes though, post your own.
Go right ahead Hung.

HungFist wrote:
And sorry about my previous post. I was a bit out of line.

Well... I admit.... it did make me a cry a little... -sniff-

https://www.bulletsnbabesdvd.com/forums/ ... php?t=4981

Markgway wrote:You know me; I'd give them all a good shagging. 8)

If you really need tell us you want to shag underage girls, please do it here. I started the kawaii thread to avoid that kind of shit.

Underage? They don't look under 16 to me (And in Japan the age of consent is 13!)

Come on Hung chill out, you're being a wee bit pretentious too. What do you expect a forum full of blokes to do, when you post pictures of pretty women?

As to being under age, I doubt Mark knew. Again an unfair comment. You're acting like saying you want to shag a pretty woman is somehow wrong? Crass maybe but not wrong.

Besides what would you want to do with them? Hold hands and smile into each others eyes maybe? .

gasteropod wrote:Underage? They don't look under 16 to me (And in Japan the age of consent is 13!)

Well, exactly. Even more read to not overreact.

I didn't realise it was 13.

bradavon wrote:Come on Hung chill out, you're being a wee bit pretentious too. What do you expect a forum full of blokes to do, when you post pictures of pretty women?

I know you guys are a bunch of perverts. That’s the whole reason why I started the new thread. I even named it into "the kawaii thread". And what happens? It doesn’t take even 48 hours till the same stupid shit starts again. You’ve already got two threads for that (this, and the caucasia thread).

bradavon wrote: Besides what would you want to do with them? Hold hands and smile into each others eyes maybe? .

Give em a big hug.

Shingster wrote:Ok i'll close this one now. Hung there was no need to have a Jeroen-esque strop over this and delete all your posts. I would have been happy to remove the posts that took this thread OT into a new thread, where they could have continued with more adult banter to their heart's content.

I'm sure if you were to start a new thread the other posters on these boards would respect your intentions, given you've now made it abundantly clear what they were when you started this thread.

I didn't mean close as in "lock". I meant lets close this argument. But no problem.

I got rid of the content, because the thread turned completely against its purpose. No need to save a trainwreck. But no hard feelings. If it doesn't work out, it doesn't work out. Lets do something else with our time.

HungFist wrote:https://www.bulletsnbabesdvd.com/forums/ ... php?t=4981

Markgway wrote:You know me; I'd give them all a good shagging. 8)

If you really need tell us you want to shag underage girls, please do it here. I started the kawaii thread to avoid that kind of shit.

Says the pervert who has a nubile schoolgirl in his avatar...

Pot. Kettle. Black.

HungFist wrote:

bradavon wrote: Besides what would you want to do with them? Hold hands and smile into each others eyes maybe? .

Give em a big hug.

Yeah, like THAT'S not weird. Like to play "Daddy" do you? Give little girls a "big hug"?

Markgway wrote:

HungFist wrote:https://www.bulletsnbabesdvd.com/forums/ ... php?t=4981

Markgway wrote:You know me; I'd give them all a good shagging. 8)

If you really need tell us you want to shag underage girls, please do it here. I started the kawaii thread to avoid that kind of shit.

Says the pervert who has a nubile schoolgirl in his avatar...

Says the pervert who . . . cannot think of anything else than perverted stuff when looking at a cute girl. Sad.

Markgway wrote:

HungFist wrote:https://www.bulletsnbabesdvd.com/forums/ ... php?t=4981

Markgway wrote:You know me; I'd give them all a good shagging. 8)

If you really need tell us you want to shag underage girls, please do it here. I started the kawaii thread to avoid that kind of shit.

Says the pervert who has a nubile schoolgirl in his avatar...

Pot. Kettle. Black.

HungFist wrote:

bradavon wrote: Besides what would you want to do with them? Hold hands and smile into each others eyes maybe? .

Give em a big hug.

Yeah, like THAT'S not weird. Like to play "Daddy" do you? Give little girls a "big hug"?

That paedophile thinking you’re applying is pretty disturbing. Is it really impossible for you to look at a female and not think about sex?

The kawaii thread was started so that there would be at least one non-sexually oriented picture thread on this board. Cute pics of people and animals. But it didn't work out as we saw.

Say hello to your cat.

HungFist wrote:I know you guys are a bunch of perverts.

Hardly. A few wise cracks is hardly being a pervert.

HungFist wrote:That’s the whole reason why I started the new thread. I even named it into "the kawaii thread".

Sorry way too cryptic for me.

HungFist wrote:And what happens? It doesn’t take even 48 hours till the same stupid shit starts again.

You should expect by now, Mark to post such a comment. I doubt he'd have bothered if you hadn't made such a big thing of it.

HungFist wrote:You’ve already got two threads for that (this, and the caucasia thread).

For the umpteenth time it's not a Caucasian thread. Caucasian means white, black people aren't Caucasian.

HungFist wrote:I got rid of the content, because the thread turned completely against its purpose. No need to save a trainwreck.

It would've just as quickly come back on topic.

Markgway wrote:Says the pervert who has a nubile schoolgirl in his avatar..

Well exactly, they're just different types of shots. That's all.

Posting picture after picture of under age women, isn't that what perverts do? Posting pictures of women flashing their panties. Isn't that what perverts do? I'd say some of Hung's shots are far more perverse than looking at naked or semi-naked women.

I also seem to recall Hung being the biggest fan of pinky films. Films that are often so gratuitous it's unreal. I appreciate I'm no expect but it doesn't take a geniuses to work out what the director's intentions were showing as much flesh as he can possibly get away with.

Markgway wrote:Yeah, like THAT'S not weird. Like to play "Daddy" do you? Give little girls a "big hug"?

LOL, so true . They're 15 remember.

No offence Hung but you're really no better or worse than any of us. Your tastes are just different. No harm in that but I personally didn't appreciate your pretentious tone to it all. Something you're usually very far from being.

Please restart your thread. I mean that genuinely. Bullets thrives on difference. You'll get the odd crass remark but mostly members will reply positively. I for one didn't say anything crass.

Markgway wrote:That paedophile thinking you’re applying is pretty disturbing. Is it really impossible for you to look at a female and not think about sex?

I'm confident I'm true when I say:

Mark was being flippant.

Markgway wrote:The kawaii thread was started so that there would be at least one non-sexually oriented picture thread on this board. Cute pics of people and animals. But it didn't work out as we saw.

Please try again.

I don't understand what is wrong with the existing thread though. Ignore Yi when he moans your pictures aren't sexual enough. If Yi wants naked Asian women he can post them. You can post pictures that interest you.

bradavon wrote:

HungFist wrote:I know you guys are a bunch of perverts.

Hardly. A few wise cracks is hardly being a pervert.

I only intended that 97% serious

bradavon wrote:

HungFist wrote:That’s the whole reason why I started the new thread. I even named it into "the kawaii thread".

Sorry way too cryptic for me.

"Since the 1970s, cuteness (可愛さ, kawaisa?) has become a prominent aspect of Japanese popular culture, entertainment, clothing, food, toys, personal appearance, behavior, and mannerisms.

Linguistic note: The word "kawaii" in Japanese has a broader definition than the English word "cute". When applied to pop culture, "cute" will suffice; however "kawaii" refers primarily to the affection of a parent toward a child coupled with the protectiveness for the innocent and weak. Thus a pop cartoon character is considered "kawaii" because it exemplifies the innocence of a child and evokes general protective, caring instincts in the viewer. Other translations of "kawaii" can include "precious", "lovable" or "innocent"."
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kawaii

An anti-sexual term in other words.

bradavon wrote:

HungFist wrote:And what happens? It doesn’t take even 48 hours till the same stupid shit starts again.

You should expect by now, Mark to post such a comment. I doubt he'd have bothered if you hadn't made such a big thing of it.

I did over-react, yes. It wasn't the comments themself that bothered me the most but the fact that people were doing the exact thing I asked them not to do.

bradavon wrote:

HungFist wrote:You’ve already got two threads for that (this, and the caucasia thread).

For the umpteenth time it's not a Caucasian thread. Caucasian means white, black people aren't Caucasian.

Sorry. Unintentional ignorance on my part

bradavon wrote: Posting picture after picture of under age women, isn't that what perverts do?

No sure if I understood that correctly. What does that make of people who post pictures of animal? The problem is that people are seeing sexual connections where they don't exist. That's scary. Similar to extreme anti-racism, which turns into racism in itself (people who are so obsessed with anti-racism that they themself can't do anything but to think of people's race and observe that everyone is treated equally).

bradavon wrote: I'd say some of Hung's shots are far more perverse than looking at naked or semi-naked women.

I don't recall posting a single pic with a sexual tone in the kawaii thread. As I said, that would go against 'kawaii'

bradavon wrote: I also seem to recall Hung being the biggest fan of pinky films.

Pinky violence films don't have any more to do with this than Chang Cheh kung fu films or playing tennis do.

bradavon wrote: I for one didn't say anything crass.

I thought about mentioning that, but perhaps it would’ve been too cruel. Brad the role model

HungFist wrote:An anti-sexual term in other words.

Thanks for the explanation. I can only think of "innocent" in English but that doesn't really fit.

HungFist wrote:I did over-react, yes. It wasn't the comments themself that bothered me the most but the fact that people were doing the exact thing I asked them not to do.

I would guess members did because you asked them not too. Mark cannot help himself. Overreact is a single word btw. I only mention it as "you" asked to be corrected .

HungFist wrote:No sure if I understood that correctly. What does that make of people who post pictures of animal?

Did you post any? My mistake. I didn't realise kawaii also included animals, at the time of posting that.

HungFist wrote:The problem is that people are seeing sexual connections where they don't exist. That's scary.

I take your point but some (granted not most) of your photos are sexual. I definitely remember one showing a young girls underwear.

I don't think saying someone is cute or pretty is a bad thing though. I appreciate you probably meant the stronger comments. Most men think with their cocks, what can you do? Shoot us all .

HungFist wrote:Similar to extreme anti-racism, which turns into racism in itself (people who are so obsessed with anti-racism that they themself can't do anything but to think of people's race and observe that everyone is treated equally).

Yeah that is a weird one.

HungFist wrote:I don't recall posting a single pic with a sexual tone in the kawaii thread. As I said, that would go against 'kawaii'

Pervese in the sense they're under age women.

The problem is kawaii is a very Japanese concept, probably not seen anywhere else. It's hard for many people to relate to posting lots of pictures of under age girls without a sexual conentation being added. Even those that aren't under age sure often look like they are.

HungFist wrote:Pinky violence films don't have any more to do with this than Chang Cheh kung fu films or playing tennis do.

We're talking at cross wires really here. I'm talking about being a pervert, you kawaii. Anyway it's not important.

HungFist wrote:I thought about mentioning that, but perhaps it would’ve been too cruel. Brad the role model

Not quite .

Seriously please try again. It may go off topic but I bet it goes back on topic just as quick.

bradavon wrote:Overreact is a single word btw. I only mention it as "you" asked to be corrected .

Danke.

bradavon wrote:

HungFist wrote:The problem is that people are seeing sexual connections where they don't exist. That's scary.

I take your point but some (granted not most) of your photos are sexual. I definitely remember one showing a young girls underwear.

Perhaps a cultural thing. With Finnish sauna culture (no, we don't wear swimsuits there) underwear alone hardly count as sexually oriented material.

And they weren't that young. Kaho (the glasses close up) was probably 16 in the pic. The others were probably 18 or over.

Now I remember the pic that briefly showed the girl's underwear. She's Chinami Ishizaka. I don't know when the photo was taken, but it can't be terribly old. And the girl is two years older than me.

bradavon wrote:

HungFist wrote:I don't recall posting a single pic with a sexual tone in the kawaii thread. As I said, that would go against 'kawaii'

Pervese in the sense they're under age women.

What does that make TV's diaper commercials?

This is what I meant by you all being perverts

bradavon wrote: The problem is kawaii is a very Japanese concept, probably not seen anywhere else. It's hard for many people to relate to posting lots of pictures of under age girls without a sexual conentation being added. Even those that aren't under age sure often look like they are.

That's true

bradavon wrote:

HungFist wrote:No sure if I understood that correctly. What does that make of people who post pictures of animal?

Did you post any? My mistake. I didn't realise kawaii also included animals, at the time of posting that.

HungFist wrote:

diceman wrote:Says the pervert who . . . cannot think of anything else than perverted stuff when looking at a cute girl. Sad.

What am I supposed to think? That I want to be their Dad? Maybe a Care Bear for them to snuggle up to? You tell me. I'm not the one posting the pictures.

It's very simple.

Hung posted pics of attractive cute young women, and even though the pics might not have been intended as 'sexual' (and I think attractive, 'innocent' young girls posing in school-outfits and other 'cute' clothes and posing IS meant to at least 'excite' SOME people, simply because they fantasize about being that special 'tutor' for a young innocent flower on her search for sexual exploration, so to say...), they will always be considered as attractive persons from the opposite sex, and thus you can always expect at least some to make 'indecent' remarks or jokes...

And just for the record, Hung. Just because you ask us to refrain ourselfs, does not nor never will make it rule of law. This is a very open, social, relaxed forum where we can banter and joke about whatever we want whenever we want, and you KNOW that, and I'm sure it's one of the reasons you, as we all do, like this place.

I understand you calling into question having a bunch of 'pervs' making rude, disrespectful and sexual remarks about some 'innocent poor girls', but you're taking that wayyy too seriously, plus I think you are at the same time overestimating the purpose of these pics of these girls, and how these chicks make a living.

They're basically selling a fantasy about pureness and innocence, and although that might be very nice and comforting to 'believe' in and take serious, it is and always be a lie.

edit: and to get this thread back on track....