Page 13 of 19

Posted: 24 Sep 2007, 17:45
by bradavon
Yi-Long wrote:I dont really understand why you have to log in to see a hot asian girl prancing around in a bathing suit.
You dont see any nipples or whatever. it isnt porn. So why do you need to log in and state that you are 18 years old or something?
What's so shocking about it?
A ridiculous amount of people are absurdly conservative :roll:

Posted: 24 Sep 2007, 17:56
by EvaUnit02
bradavon wrote:The thing is 99% of Youtube content is utter rubbish, it's really so bad. All that annoying crud gets in the way of the 1% of decent video footage. That's why I cannot be bothered to create an account. It's also annoying the quality is rubbish and they using sodding Flash, which was never designed to display video in the first place.
No, Flash video is great. The perfect delivery system for light-weight streaming content that loads in no time. Totally DRM free too. Before the invention of FLV, we had to put up with the shit Real media formats (low res , but strangely it still had absolute arse streaming performance); and WMV (not shit, but loaded to the gills with DRM. Also has terrible streaming performance). This aforementioned shit was always buffering, rebuffering. Absolutely endless.

Th is all in my personal experience. Internet connections are still very ghetto in NZ, we only unbundled the local very recently. The monopolistic government owned Telecom was keeping our internet in the stone age (and not forgetting the high prices, for absolute shit plans), 5 years behind the rest of the world. Finally parliament put their foot down.

Posted: 24 Sep 2007, 18:07
by bradavon
Oh fair enough don't get me wrong it easily beats RealMedia (in every way) and WMV (for streaming) both of which have to buffer even on an 8Mb connection but I'd still prefer proper download high quality links. That's what I really meant.

I presume RM does on 8Mb I refuse to install on it on my Vista PC. I've only seen the BBC website which still uses RM on most of it's site.

Posted: 24 Sep 2007, 18:12
by EvaUnit02
Companies love Real and Windows media video formats because of the DRM options. For the likes of BBC streaming content, they want something will be unviewable 7 days after the original TV broadcast.

Posted: 24 Sep 2007, 18:59
by bradavon
Yeah I just wish they wouldn't use RM though. It is weird Adobe haven't added DRM to Flash.

Posted: 24 Sep 2007, 22:48
by thelostdragon
Signing up with YouTube is free.

Posted: 14 Oct 2007, 14:46
by Killer Meteor
Youtube is really good. The vintage material to see - though limited since the change in ownership - rocks

Posted: 19 May 2008, 18:26
by bradavon
Harumi Nemoto

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Posted: 19 May 2008, 19:53
by grim_tales
She's amazing Brad :) Very nice.

Posted: 19 May 2008, 20:00
by bradavon
She is isn't she. LD posted her pick on the previous page. I then went hunting :D.

Posted: 19 May 2008, 20:15
by HungFist
Very plain looking.

Posted: 19 May 2008, 20:21
by bradavon
You're only saying that because you dislike big boobs :D.

In my book the photos you post are very plain ;). Plain meaning normal/average looking. For a Japanese woman Harumi Nemoto is anything but average looking. In other words she cannot be "plain" ;).

I don't much like the ones of her in that bizarre underwear but the rest are great. The last one is my fave.

p.s - I'm sure we can agree, the thread needed bumping 8).

Posted: 19 May 2008, 20:54
by grim_tales
I think she has a cute natural look although her boobs are very big

Posted: 19 May 2008, 20:58
by tom2681
Yuck. Looks like a supermodel.

Posted: 19 May 2008, 21:07
by bradavon
Tit wanks, rock. Try that with a flat chested lass :D 8).

Posted: 19 May 2008, 21:37
by gasteropod
Woah, nice jugs, especially for an Asian :D

Posted: 19 May 2008, 22:03
by bradavon
Real too. Bonus!

Posted: 19 May 2008, 22:24
by HungFist
tom2681 wrote:Looks like a supermodel.
My thoughs exactly. Seen a million of those.

Posted: 19 May 2008, 22:59
by bradavon
Funny. I saw a million plain Japanese women in Japan, okay not a million :D.

Posted: 19 May 2008, 23:17
by HungFist
You must've been to Kyoto then.

Posted: 19 May 2008, 23:19
by Markgway
She's a bit old for Hung. :wink:

Posted: 19 May 2008, 23:21
by bradavon
HungFist wrote:You must've been to Kyoto then.
You're right I did, just for the day though.
Markgway wrote:She's a bit old for Hung. :wink:
Good point. Hung's girls still need potty training :D.

Posted: 19 May 2008, 23:38
by HungFist
Aibu Saki

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
Markgway wrote:She's a bit old for Hung. :wink:
well, she is 6 years older than me :wink:

Posted: 19 May 2008, 23:56
by bradavon
She's pretty but her face looks no more or less "supermodel" than the photos on the previous page :?. Especially in the last photo. The first few are "natural shots" so cannot fairly be compared against touched up shots.

Literally the only way the two differ is breast size, does bigger boobs make someone look more like a supermodel or plain?

Posted: 19 May 2008, 23:59
by tom2681
This one's got a round face (japanese-like).
Your bird is more caucasian-shaped.

Bigger breasts= Barbie doll-like supermodel.
Smaller breasts= Plain (more human).