https://www.bulletsnbabesdvd.com/forums/
https://www.bulletsnbabesdvd.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5218
Cost is a factor I'm afraid. LED TV's are uber expensive.is there a problem with Sharp BD Players then?to avoid at all cost you'd think we were talking about a bush,matsui or something!bradavon wrote:I'd avoid this at all cost, especially as the Sony is so cheap. Who owns Sharp BD Players?saltysam wrote:HMV are doing a Sharp player for £99,don't know what it's like though.
And?Optimum for example are using coding more & more so i am right.anyway i'm multi-region so it doesn't matter to me,i'm just saying that if i was going to get myself stuck with one Region it would be B,i used to think the opposite.bradavon wrote:You were the one saying they're bound to use it more in the future at some point
A lot more? I've no idea. Fair point then. I'm sure you'd be happy with LCD.grim_tales wrote:Plasmas are more expensive
Of coursegrim_tales wrote:Not necessarily better, both have advantages and disadvantages
but overall Plasma is better. There are threads on this forum about it, search.Fair point. I only meant next to a £99 Sony and the fact Sharp's aren't owned enough to trust, IMO.saltysam wrote:Is there a problem with Sharp BD Players then?to avoid at all cost you'd think we were talking about a bush,matsui or something!
Fair enough.saltysam wrote:i'm just saying that if i was going to get myself stuck with one Region it would be B,i used to think the opposite.
Is that a reason not to buy it? I mean it's not as if we're talking a huge amount here, it's a TV. If they're better it wouldn't stop me getting one. I think they're better than they used to be.saltysam wrote:Plasma is good but (i may be wrong) i hear they are power-hungry.
It really depends how big the room is though and if you could fit such a size. I'd upgrade to 37" now but not higher, certainly not bigger than 40" no way.Markgway wrote:I would suggest going for a 40" screen. Anything less will diminish the impact.
Plasmas seem to be on their way out (though IM will disagreebradavon wrote:Is that a reason not to buy it? I mean it's not as if we're talking a huge amount here, it's a TV. If they're better it wouldn't stop me getting one. I think they're better than they used to be.saltysam wrote:Plasma is good but (i may be wrong) i hear they are power-hungry.
) they are always going cheap in Richer/TJ's 50inch screens for £600-£700.even pioneer have stopped production unless i'm mistaken.and actually despite being a tv they are power hungry.so much so there is talk of banning some modelsMarkgway wrote:I would suggest going for a 40" screen. Anything less will diminish the impact.
couldn't go back to a small screen now.even watching films on the upstairs 27" films look so tiny.bradavon wrote:It really depends how big the room is though and if you could fit such a size. I'd upgrade to 37" now but not higher, certainly not bigger than 40" no way.
) As far as I can see I'd hardly be craning upwards to watch 32"/37" FGS!You're probably right but with LED costing a bomb and the fact they're still better than LCD, they're still the way to go for quality. Price aside of course.saltysam wrote:Plasmas seem to be on their way out (though IM will disagree) they are always going cheap in Richer/TJ's 50inch screens for £600-£700.
Isn't that cost instead of the fact they're going out? In today's economy.saltysam wrote:even pioneer have stopped production unless i'm mistaken.
Me either but Grim only has 28" (CRT) at the moment. I still say a TV should complement a room. I'd never go bigger than 40" in my front room, even that would probably engulf it. I hate seeing an overpowering TV in a room when it's not being used.saltysam wrote:couldn't go back to a small screen now.even watching films on the upstairs 27" films look so tiny.
How do you work that one out? The 37" will be much taller.grim_tales wrote:If I can fit 28" CRT I can fit 37" LCD/Plasma - as they're physically the same size.
I don't. I'd like a bigger screen but no way do I crave one. I crave a new mobile phone (when Windows Mobile 7 comes), a new Car Stereo and Freeview HD way more.gasteropod wrote:Indeed, the novelty soon wears off and you crave an even larger screen.
How so? Sure the width maybe but the height would have to be much more, no? If you're so sure, why are you even debating it?grim_tales wrote:Won't 37" only be just a little taller? Think of the area round the sides of a W/S CRT and replace that with more 'screen' - then you have 37" I think).
No longer available:saltysam wrote:Not a chance at that price,it'll be dvd only.PC World are selling off the Sony BD i got for £99, it's a fantastic machine and at least it can be made MR for dvd.
lmao, Brad...bradavon wrote:I don't. I'd like a bigger screen but no way do I crave one.
Perhaps you have some crazy shit going on with your walls, but I'm sure a lot of people just have a blank wall behind their TV...bradavon wrote:I must be the only one who cares about how my front room looks, instead of dumping a 60" TV in there and not being able to see anything else.
my 46 (not 60) tv is in the corner of the living room along with the amp,hi-fi,sky,ps3/bd player.how that transpires into not being able to see anything else i'm not sure what you are on about!bradavon wrote: I must be the only one who cares about how my front room looks, instead of dumping a 60" TV in there and not being able to see anything else.
there's still plenty in-store at various locations.bradavon wrote:No longer available:saltysam wrote:Not a chance at that price,it'll be dvd only.PC World are selling off the Sony BD i got for £99, it's a fantastic machine and at least it can be made MR for dvd.
http://www.pcworld.co.uk/martprd/product/seo/418077
What's funny?gasteropod wrote:lmao, Brad...
I do have several decent framed paintings/pictures but it's more how such a large objects sits in a room. I hate those massive American fridges too, so pointless for most.gasteropod wrote:Perhaps you have some crazy shit going on with your walls, but I'm sure a lot of people just have a blank wall behind their TV...