Page 2 of 2
Posted: 06 Sep 2007, 12:44
by grim_tales
The irony is that I come up with that explanation, and I'm the least sexually experienced out of all of you

(Did I say that?)

Posted: 06 Sep 2007, 14:28
by bradavon
Markgway wrote:Yes Grim, but Brad doesn't "GET IT".
I do get it. I'd have thought that was obvious. It's you who doesn't GET IT SIR
grim_tales wrote:Isn't the guide supposed to turn both partners on/show them what to do? If it didnt it wouldnt be a very good guide

I don't believe it is no. A sex guide is there to give partners ideas, they themselves turn each other on. It's not the guide "specifically" which turns people on. God I hope not, it's so stale and formulaic. The Sex Guide is an instruction tool, it's specific purpose is not to titillate.
Obviously for Mark any sight of flesh turns him on though

. Mark has already said "any" sight of a attractive woman gives him a hard-on.
Ah fuck it like I said we're going around in circles.
grim_tales wrote:The irony is that I come up with that explanation, and I'm the least sexually experienced out of all of you

(Did I say that?)

There's no harm in being honest dude, more people are than they have the guts to let on.
Posted: 06 Sep 2007, 17:02
by degeneration
9 Songs surely can't be about titilation?! Have you seen the woman in it?!? No way in hell would the site of her naked or not turn me on. No breasts whatsoever and the face doesn't do that much for me either...
http://www.celebritymoviearchive.com/to ... .php/11820 - NSFW
Posted: 06 Sep 2007, 17:40
by grim_tales
I have to agree with you Degen....
Posted: 06 Sep 2007, 18:50
by saltysam
i've tried but haven't been able to sit all the way through 9 songs even though it's only short.it's a borefest despite the shagging.if i want porn i'll download jenna jameson's latest

Posted: 06 Sep 2007, 19:04
by bradavon
Her face looks pretty, the last capture is just a bad shot of her. Do all women have to have double H breasts before you're interested guys?
Posted: 06 Sep 2007, 19:16
by grim_tales
No, fair enough if theyre bad shots though.
Posted: 06 Sep 2007, 19:25
by saltysam
The bird in 9 songs is very unsexy,perhaps that's the point.
Posted: 06 Sep 2007, 19:33
by Markgway
Here's a better image.
She's no raving beauty... but she looks quite pleasent in a regular way.
http://i.imdb.com/Photos/Events/2751/Ma ... 79_400.jpg
OMG! Someone has edited my sig. A moderator has abused his powers (I'm looking at you Brad). That's not on!!

Posted: 06 Sep 2007, 20:01
by degeneration
bradavon wrote:Her face looks pretty, the last capture is just a bad shot of her. Do all women have to have double H breasts before you're interested guys?
No, I'd prefer D cup... But bee stings don't do much for me. Call it personal preference.
Posted: 06 Sep 2007, 22:53
by bradavon
Markgway wrote:OMG! Someone has edited my sig. A moderator has abused his powers (I'm looking at you Brad). That's not on!!

What me? No never

Posted: 06 Sep 2007, 23:53
by Markgway
I'm not laughing.... that's crossing the line.
Posted: 07 Sep 2007, 00:50
by bradavon
Posted: 07 Sep 2007, 02:46
by Markgway
It's abuse of moderation powers, and no one here wants us to go back to the way you used to be with your "international vaginas".
Posted: 17 Sep 2007, 13:39
by grim_tales
Saw a bit of Nuts TV when it was launched. Disappointing/rubbish TBH, considering the magazine its based on.
Posted: 17 Sep 2007, 15:37
by bradavon
I watched 1.5 shows and my god what utter drivel. You're right the magazine is much better, it's rubbish too though.
What the fuck is that Lucy Pinder bit when she reads a dull as dish water story. What a waste!
I can't believe how poor TV it is. Come on the magazine has T&A why not the TV show? It doesn't start until 9pm and goes on until 1am so they can definitely get away with it, they do on Satellite. They don't even cover a third of the same subjects the magazine does. It's just really, really lame games all night.
I definitely won't be bothering again, a complete waste of time. It's even poorer than Men and Motors, at least that had some proper car shows.
Posted: 17 Sep 2007, 15:50
by grim_tales
Agree about the Lucy Pinder bit when she reads Shakespeare etc - WTF!

Posted: 17 Sep 2007, 17:53
by degeneration
Will concur with the sentiments stated on this page. Nuts TV is utter shite.
Watched the "Fit & Fearless" thing the other night, and while yes the girls were fit and seemed happy to strip down to their underwear, they definitely were not fearless. Bunch of screaming girls is what they were.... I know it was all just a piss take parody type thing, but at least give the viewer some 'T' in the T&A. As is stated, the magazine does and indeed that is basically its selling point, so why not the TV channel??!?
I'll check back to it every now and then, but I'll switch it off within a few mins each time if there isn't any boobies on view.
Posted: 17 Sep 2007, 18:05
by bradavon
I sense your remote batteries will quickly run out
For some reason they seem to think they have to work with the constraints of British TV which means T&A isn't allowed, when it is. Just look at late night Satellite completely unencrypted (it's as a free as Freeview).
A bit of a laugh with T&A could be good fun but no they give us drivel like that Pinder stuff and trash game shows.
I put Nuts TV on the same level as Euro Trash except at least that was funny occasionally.
Posted: 17 Sep 2007, 18:29
by grim_tales
Eurotrash at least had flashes of T&A

Posted: 17 Sep 2007, 20:44
by degeneration
Eurotrash was awesome!! It didn't even try to hide or pretend about the fact that it was trash and it had nudity, so was good all round. Nuts Tv is trying to pretend to be good fun TV with game shows and the like, but it is just trash.
Posted: 17 Sep 2007, 20:44
by bradavon
grim_tales wrote:Eurotrash at least had flashes of T&A

Usually by ugly French men
