Posted: 11 Jul 2006, 18:39
Anna and the King good WTF??? They completely changed the story, since when did Anna and the King fall in love?
That would never ever have happened. There is no way an Asian King would fall in love with a Westerner, it would never be allowed in Thailand now and certainly not at that time. It didn't even happen in the original stage play so why add it in now?
Since when does CYF look remotely Thai or even South East Asian (I can let this one go just like I did in Memoirs of a Geisha) but everyone speaking English really got on my nerves. The film was banned in Thailand.
It was soo Hollywood gloss just like Chocolat and almost all the films Ron Howard makes. Everyone has perfectly white teeth, no one is filthy you get the idea.
It looked nice though.
They rare use the extra time for character development too.
God can't CYF find decent American roles? He has so much talent that no one in America seems to notice or care about.
You seem to revel in the stuff. I can't remember the last time I watched/listened to anything from New Zealand.
It's just interesting that's all. Agreed about the review it was most excellent.
That would never ever have happened. There is no way an Asian King would fall in love with a Westerner, it would never be allowed in Thailand now and certainly not at that time. It didn't even happen in the original stage play so why add it in now?
Since when does CYF look remotely Thai or even South East Asian (I can let this one go just like I did in Memoirs of a Geisha) but everyone speaking English really got on my nerves. The film was banned in Thailand.
It was soo Hollywood gloss just like Chocolat and almost all the films Ron Howard makes. Everyone has perfectly white teeth, no one is filthy you get the idea.
It looked nice though.
It's 10 minutes longer than the first so 150 minutes.EvaUnit02 wrote:The movie is reportedly 140mins, which I have no problem with. A reviewer on TV yesterday was whining about how long Hollywood films are these days.
Agreed if it's needed and the story is weighty enough to cope. The problem is often when it comes to Hollywood they simply don't have enough story to fill the space up so resort to what I'll call it "uber-padding".EvaUnit02 wrote:Personally I like it, gives the film more room to breathe. More opportunities for character development, more action set-pieces etc.
They rare use the extra time for character development too.
I see your point but don't you think if say half the film was rubbish your opinion of the film would be completely different and you'd no longer like it (say it was twice as long as half was boring).romerojpg wrote:Some masterpieces are long, but I wish they were far, far longer like The Thin Red Line.
Huh? So he'll be in Pirates 3? Will he have a big part?romerojpg wrote:still I cannotwait to see Chow Yun Fat in another big hollywood film, and this may be his 1st hollywood hittook him long enuff.
God can't CYF find decent American roles? He has so much talent that no one in America seems to notice or care about.
Are you part British?EvaUnit02 wrote:I listened to the Mark Kermode webcast during the day and it was hilarious, the best one I've heard since he ripped into Cameron Crowe's shitfest Elizabethtown.
"Orlondo Bland" - hit the nail on the head.
It's just interesting that's all. Agreed about the review it was most excellent.
