Face/Off - 2 Disc SE - DVD/HD-DVD/BD

romerojpg · Post by **romerojpg** » 10 Sep 2007, 18:52

I assumed the Japanese version was not a new transfer or remastered, as people described it as not very clean, or a great transfer

I have not seen any deteiled reviews ,mind you, which is unusual as someone always reviews these types of HD discs.

I would expect the new HD DVD will be a brand new re mastered transfer (you would hope).

I guess in a few months time when all the different companies release Face Off on the various formats and from various companies, omeone will buy them all and see which si best

let them do the hard work. I already have the HD DVD from america ready to come, so I wont be looking around

saltysam · Post by **saltysam** » 10 Sep 2007, 19:12

yeah,i'll be getting the HD-DVD usa version.

IronMonkey · Post by **IronMonkey** » 10 Sep 2007, 19:27

bradavon wrote:Even if I'm wrong about Face/Off it doesn't suddenly mean Lethal Weapon is anything more than good or was that pretty average.

Pretty average?!

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 10 Sep 2007, 19:40

Yes pretty average. None of them are keepers.

saltysam · Post by **saltysam** » 10 Sep 2007, 19:45

The first 2 lethal weapon's are classics.

IronMonkey · Post by **IronMonkey** » 10 Sep 2007, 20:15

saltysam wrote:The first 2 lethal weapon's are classics.

I concur.

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 10 Sep 2007, 20:22

saltysam wrote:The first 2 lethal weapon's are classics.

Amen to that.

And 3 is still good fun.

romerojpg · Post by **romerojpg** » 10 Sep 2007, 20:23

so is 4 haha

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 11 Sep 2007, 00:15

4 is weak, but still better than average, which says a lot about the state of American action cinema.

They turned the series into fuckin' Scooby Doo. Did we really need Chris Rock. I mean, did we???

romerojpg · Post by **romerojpg** » 11 Sep 2007, 16:29

Markgway wrote:4 is weak, but still better than average, which says a lot about the state of American action cinema.

They turned the series into fuckin' Scooby Doo. Did we really need Chris Rock. I mean, did we???

BUT it could have been a lot worse, it could have been Chris Tucker!!!!!!!!

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 11 Sep 2007, 22:24

True, but that wouldn't have been THAT much worse.

They both screech a lot.

Frankly, I could've done without Joe Pesci too, who went from endearing to bloody annoying.

And come to think of it Rene Russo was kind annoying too.

WTF???

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 11 Sep 2007, 22:59

If you keep going Mark there won't be any actors left

I don't get why you guys hate either Chris tbh, sure they're not amazing to watch but they don't especially bother me either.

EvaUnit02 · Post by **EvaUnit02** » 12 Sep 2007, 00:16

Chris Rock's stand-up is fucking awesome.