01:40 (first line of dialogue)
Wild Side Subtitle sample:
Criterion:
Not the exact same frame.
Thought so. The Wild Side picture is slightly cropped, soft and contrast boosted.
Still, it doesn't look as bad as I thought it would.
Strangely enough, the WS has more shadow detail in night scenes.
Last edited by tom2681 on 06 Jul 2006, 13:09, edited 1 time in total.
I used to be "the man who loves the movies you hate".
Now I'm just "that weird french guy with a cat avatar who comes to BnB once a year for no reason and then disappears again".
Is it really necessary to use PNG, though ?
That format is heavy as hell.
I used to be "the man who loves the movies you hate".
Now I'm just "that weird french guy with a cat avatar who comes to BnB once a year for no reason and then disappears again".
Is it really necessary to use PNG, though ?
That format is heavy as hell.
Whoops, Sorry Tom, yeah the format is heavy, but the actual capture is what you get from the dvd. Using JPG format, will result in a little loss of information, which may be crucial in someone need or getting the perfect A/V dvd
I have no problem with using PNG.
Hell, I'd be using 1024x576 PNG captures if Brad would let me.
I just feel bad for the 56k modem guys, that's all.
I used to be "the man who loves the movies you hate".
Now I'm just "that weird french guy with a cat avatar who comes to BnB once a year for no reason and then disappears again".
The Criterion looks much nicer. I wonder how the PAL-NTSC Madman R4 looks?
How many people still use 56K? If they do then frankly it's there tuff luck for staying in the past. I can't talk for anywhere else but 56K is actually more expensive in the UK to even the most basic Broadband package.
I used to be "the man who loves the movies you hate".
Now I'm just "that weird french guy with a cat avatar who comes to BnB once a year for no reason and then disappears again".