Toge's nice birds topic

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 11 Nov 2005, 11:20

I wouldn't say no to Charisma, but she's not in my top 50.

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 11 Nov 2005, 16:01

Monica Belluci is probably one of the most attractive women in the world.

She looks like a real woman not like women we get in the UK (or America for that matter) at all. Salma Hayek is gorgeous to.

Many women get more attractive after 30. A woman in her 20s (often to me anyway) still looks like a girl, often.

BiscLimpkit wrote:Her name's Marina Matsushima.

Go to Google and do an image search with her name. Click on the first link, scroll down a bit... wohoah momma (if you know what I'm talkin about heheheh).

Which one? I can't find the one you mean.

BiscLimpkit · Post by **BiscLimpkit** » 11 Nov 2005, 16:53

Click here for the website I was referring to

Warning, has photos of boobs n stuff.

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 11 Nov 2005, 17:35

I found that but it looks to be more about politics.

Holy shit maybe not

p.s - This lady is lovely, some of the others really are not

The guys rambling about big breasted Asian women further down makes me

:

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 11 Nov 2005, 17:40

romerojpg wrote:I will post this again as its soo nice

I think you mean

:twisted: :

She's so nice

It really pisses me off when people refer to women as ' it ' or ' that ' , such as:

"Look at that".

grim_tales · Post by **grim_tales** » 11 Nov 2005, 17:48

I think Romero meant "I will post this pic again".
He wasnt referring to Charisma as "this" or "that"

The problem with that is..?

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 11 Nov 2005, 18:00

The "it" Romero clearly refers to is in "it" being the image, Brad.

Check your English before jumping down someone's throat.

BiscLimpkit · Post by **BiscLimpkit** » 11 Nov 2005, 18:25

Yeah man, it'll be a miracle (even by Romero's standards) if he posted a physical woman, let alone Charisma Carpenter.

Note to Romero: you have to achieve what I just said somehow.

romerojpg · Post by **romerojpg** » 11 Nov 2005, 20:33

Jesus hahah good job I ddnt call her a piece of meat

brooce-leroy · Post by **brooce-leroy** » 12 Nov 2005, 02:10

bradavon wrote: p.s - Seriously you'd get roasted? I wish people weren't so god damn conservative.

Depends on who's doing the roasting, and how many join in.

romerojpg · Post by **romerojpg** » 12 Nov 2005, 13:50

Again, back to the piece of meat mentality.

EvaUnit02 · Post by **EvaUnit02** » 12 Nov 2005, 13:54

bradavon wrote:
romerojpg wrote:I will post this again as its soo nice
I think you mean :twisted: :

She's so nice

It really pisses me off when people refer to women as ' it ' or ' that ' , such as:

"Look at that".

I thought you were a heavily left-leaning person who hates PC-ness?

grim_tales · Post by **grim_tales** » 12 Nov 2005, 14:13

I'm sure he misunderstood Eva, but it was obvious to me Romero was referring to the image as it, not the girl.

EvaUnit02 · Post by **EvaUnit02** » 12 Nov 2005, 22:47

grim_tales wrote:I'm sure he misunderstood Eva, but it was obvious to me Romero was referring to the image as it, not the girl.

I know dude. I was just observing that the whole "you shouldn't objectify women" comment by Brad seemed to go against the character that he's portrayed in the past.

Wait... my original comments clashes with itself:-

I thought you were a heavily left-leaning person who hates PC-ness?

PC-ness IS a heavily left-leaning concept. So nevermind - Brad's in his usual character.

My political leanings depend on the issue on hand, I guess everyone's the same.

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 12 Nov 2005, 23:08

Markgway wrote:The "it" Romero clearly refers to is in "it" being the image, Brad.

Check your English before jumping down someone's throat.

Check your English. It could easily be referring to the image or person. I mistook it for the latter. IT is so damn ambiguous.

As you're so sure justify why it couldn't be taken the other way? As to me at least it makes perfect sense the way I originally thought it.

EvaUnit02 wrote:I thought you were a heavily left-leaning person who hates PC-ness?

You're getting me and Mark mixed up.

For the record I'm half and half. If it means we're allowed to disrespect people (such as referring to women as objects) then I'm against it but if goes to far (such as not being allowed to call a board a black board) then I'm against it.

Of course it's all so subjective.

EvaUnit02 wrote:My political leanings depend on the issue on hand, I guess everyone's the same.

Yep.

At 19 (you're 19 right?) you understand the differences between political left and political right far more than me and I'm 27 next month

grim_tales wrote:The problem with that is..?

I said:

People saying "that" when they mean "her".

grim_tales · Post by **grim_tales** » 13 Nov 2005, 09:12

Eva is 19.

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 13 Nov 2005, 12:18

bradavon wrote:Check your English. It could easily be referring to the image or person. I mistook it for the latter. IT is so damn ambiguous. As you're so sure justify why it couldn't be taken the other way? As to me at least it makes perfect sense the way I originally thought it.

I don't need to justify... the fact that YOU were the ONLY person who thought Romero was referring to the model rather than the image of her speaks for itself. 8)

romerojpg · Post by **romerojpg** » 13 Nov 2005, 13:33

tom2681 · Post by **tom2681** » 13 Nov 2005, 16:47

[Anti-PC Rant Mode On]

Women are pieces of meat, they want men to think of them as pieces of meat, and they like it.

I dare ya to say otherwise.

We're talking about nice birds aka: Women's BODIES.
When we make a topic about their brains, then we can say "she" instead of "it.

[/Anti-PC Rant Mode Off]

*Hides behind a door with a baseball bat and waits for an Angry Brad to come in*

---------
EDIT:
BTW Brad, between:
-Your unexplainable aversion to the word "cunt".
-Your "don't objectify women" speech.

I'd say you've got some serious issues.
Have you ever considered therapy ?

tom2681 · Post by **tom2681** » 13 Nov 2005, 17:02

Anyway, back on topic:

brooce-leroy · Post by **brooce-leroy** » 13 Nov 2005, 17:28

She's looking good there. Sometimes resembles a stick insect, but nice to see a bit of meat again.

grim_tales · Post by **grim_tales** » 13 Nov 2005, 17:29

Who's Kelly Chan? I know Kelly CHEN (singer).

BiscLimpkit · Post by **BiscLimpkit** » 13 Nov 2005, 17:36

She is Kelly Chen... at least that's how she has been credited in such titles as Breaking News and Infernal Affairs.

She is also a singer and is deliciously hot, IMO.

IronMonkey · Post by **IronMonkey** » 13 Nov 2005, 17:55

BiscLimpkit wrote:She is also a singer and is deliciously hot, IMO.

I'll second that! She's gorgeous!

Yi-Long · Post by **Yi-Long** » 13 Nov 2005, 18:47

My girl had a huge poster of kelly chen when she still had short hair. IMO she looks OK with the long hair, but with the short hair: WOW! Delicious!