http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... quits.html
I bet this means it will still be made but will be shit. I hope Damon refuses to make it unless Greengrass (or Liman) comes back.
Still haven't forgiven him for managing to make a dull movie from such a great concept (Jumper).Markgway wrote: That's if they can't get Liman - the original and best director (of the series) back.
Thought you liked T4bradavon wrote: I fear they'd replace him with someone like McG or Bret Ratner who'd turn it into a mess.
Are you for real? You're putting him in the same category as Brett Ratner. Check out United 9/11, Bloody Sunday. He's no hack!Yi-Long wrote:The guy is a hack.
I certainly do and no it's not a mess but obviously it's no T1 or T2 for being a serious film, as well as decent action film. That's what McG would do to Bourne also.saltysam wrote:Thought you liked T4was that a mess
Haven't seen that.saltysam wrote:Still haven't forgiven him for managing to make a dull movie from such a great concept (Jumper).
I'm sure the producers would have something to say about that. The only film of his I've seen is DH4 but I thought it was very entertaining.bradavon wrote:Len fucking Wiseman! Are you for real? He'd fill Bourne with lots of colourful CGI.
Action films can have good acting and very good scripts. I take your point about them being thrillers more than pure action though. How about someone like Brian DePalma then? Or Martin Campbell?The thing is the Bourne films aren't just action films, they're also proper thrillers, with good acting and very good scripts.
I fear they'd replace him with someone like McG or Bret Ratner who'd turn it into a mess.
Excellent choices. Especially Campbell. John McTiernan would be good too. John Frankenheimer would've also been good.Markgway wrote:How about someone like Brian DePalma then? Or Martin Campbell?
He directed Scarface, The Untouchables, Casualties of War, Carlito's Way, Mission Impossible, and Snake Eyes, what the fuck do you think? Comments like this is what this smiley was made for:grim_tales wrote:Would De Palma know how to do action?
Maybe not but they were still the main focus of the F & F movies and both were awol for part 3 and the franchise survived which was my point.The Bourne movies could easily carry on without Shakeycam legend Greengrass who isn't particularly great.Damon is the much bigger loss.bradavon wrote: Paul Walker and Vin Diesel aren't Grangrass and Damon though.
Actually, I think it's a good idea. No Greengrass, no Damon, they're gonna end up with something different. It's better to do it on purpose.bradavon wrote: A Bourne film without Bourne. Hmm. great idea!

The main focus was the action and Walker is very easily replaced. I take your point but it's not the best examplesaltysam wrote:Maybe not but they were still the main focus of the F & F movies and both were awol for part 3 and the franchise survived which was my point.
He's a very good director IMO. Even if you dislike his "modern" directing style. I agree he can be replaced, Liman did a fine job of part 1. I also agree Damon is a bigger loss.saltysam wrote:The Bourne movies could easily carry on without Shakeycam legend Greengrass who isn't particularly great.
Agreed. There isn't much further they can take the character but Bourne without Bourne is gonna be hard to pull off. The film is completely about Jason Bourne.HungFist wrote:Actually, I think it's a good idea. No Greengrass, no Damon, they're gonna end up with something different.
Let's hear your example then.bradavon wrote:saltysam wrote: but it's not the best example.