Tom's nice asian birds topic

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 22 Jan 2009, 01:40

HungFist wrote:That paedophile thinking you’re applying is pretty disturbing. Is it really impossible for you to look at a female and not think about sex?

There are many categories of females I can look at without thinking about sex.

1. Relatives
2. Old dears
3. Children
4. Ugly moos

Anything else is open season (and that includes Japanese teens). Sorry if that offends your bizzaro sensibilities. But VERY VERY few men like looking at pretty teenage girls for any OTHER reason.

You call them "cute". What's that supposed to mean?

I even named it into "the kawaii thread".

Like I'm supposed to know what that means?

bradavon wrote:I'm confident I'm true when I say:

Mark was being flippant.

Yes, of course I was. I'm hardly going to go to Japan, track down all the girls in photos and shag them, am I? That's HungFist's job. Besides, crucially, none of these girls are actually underage and I'm well aware of that. I hope I haven't spoilt anything for Hung.

I didn't realise kawaii also included animals

I don't recall a host of pics of fluffy kittens. Only teenage girls.

HungFist wrote:The problem is that people are seeing sexual connections where they don't exist.

You're not trying to make that one fly are you? These girls are "innocent" as in innocently sexy. Not the same as a picture of a puppy. And if you can't tell the difference it says more about you than any of us.

Yi-Long wrote:They're basically selling a fantasy about pureness and innocense, and although that might be very nice and comforting to 'believe' in and take serious, it is and always be a lie.

Finally some words of sense. If HungFist is genuine in what he says why ONLY post images of attractive girls aged between 16-18? Why not girls younger than 16 if it's all so innocent? [And before anyone is dumb enough to post to contrary I'm not suggesting he actually do it] Aren't pre-teen girls cute in an innocent way? Babies even? You posted teen girls for a reason and you can dress it up however you want if it makes you feel better. Blame the Japanese... I don't care.

gasteropod · Post by **gasteropod** » 22 Jan 2009, 02:36

Nice pic, Yi

The hand in the weird goldfish bowl is puzzling lol

Yi-Long · Post by **Yi-Long** » 22 Jan 2009, 02:49

gasteropod wrote:Nice pic, Yi The hand in the weird goldfish bowl is puzzling lol

Didnt even notice that. Guess I was distracted by some other parts of the picture...

HungFist · Post by **HungFist** » 22 Jan 2009, 09:02

Markgway wrote: I hope I haven't spoilt anything for Hung.

No hard feelings, Mark

Markgway wrote: I don't recall a host of pics of fluffy kittens. Only teenage girls.

You made your post before I had posted the cats and dogs.

Yi-Long wrote:They're basically selling a fantasy about pureness and innocense, and although that might be very nice and comforting to 'believe' in and take serious, it is and always be a lie.

Of course. That's an idol's job. But it doesn't make individual pics any less kawaii.

Markgway wrote:Finally some words of sense. If HungFist is genuine in what he says why ONLY post images of attractive girls aged between 16-18? Why not girls younger than 16 if it's all so innocent?

Because I was posting pics that I had and found most kawaii. Age wasn't a selection criteria.

degeneration · Post by **degeneration** » 22 Jan 2009, 16:32

Ok, can someone please tell me what Kawaii means?

It is like that guy from Never Been Kissed who decides to make up a word and get everyone else to use it all the time...

Once I've got what Kawaii means maybe I'll post an opinion on this...

Yi-Long · Post by **Yi-Long** » 22 Jan 2009, 16:37

From what I understand (and in my defense, that's hardly anything), it means a combination of cute, innocent and pure. So completely non-sexual, but 'adorable' and something that makes you warm and tingly and 'awwwwwwww... that's sweet' inside.

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 22 Jan 2009, 18:41

Yi-Long wrote:From what I understand (and in my defense, that's hardly anything), it means a combination of cute, innocent and pure. So completely non-sexual, but 'adorable' and something that makes you warm and tingly and 'awwwwwwww... that's sweet' inside.

In other words a definition that none of Hung Fist's photos of pretty teens fit.

Yi-Long · Post by **Yi-Long** » 22 Jan 2009, 18:47

Markgway wrote:
Yi-Long wrote:From what I understand (and in my defense, that's hardly anything), it means a combination of cute, innocent and pure. So completely non-sexual, but 'adorable' and something that makes you warm and tingly and 'awwwwwwww... that's sweet' inside.
In other words a definition that none of Hung Fist's photos of pretty teens fit.

TBH, none of Hung's pictures managed to sexually arouse/excite me, but maybe that's just because I'm not really into cute girly girls who pretend to be innocent....

...but obviously, there will always be many who ARE sexually attracted to cute young innocent women... and when it's a girl that I find attractive, so would I. But the pics that Hung posted did very little for me in that regard, and they also werent meant that way, so I guess in that regard they served their purpose...

HungFist · Post by **HungFist** » 22 Jan 2009, 18:48

Markgway wrote:
Yi-Long wrote:From what I understand (and in my defense, that's hardly anything), it means a combination of cute, innocent and pure. So completely non-sexual, but 'adorable' and something that makes you warm and tingly and 'awwwwwwww... that's sweet' inside.
In other words a definition that none of Hung Fist's photos of pretty teens fit.

A photo of a baby in diaper wouldn't fit if we ask you. It's not my fault you add a sexual connection to every photo and at the same time fail to see the cuteness.

romerojpg · Post by **romerojpg** » 22 Jan 2009, 18:55

Slack Jawed Faggots

Yi-Long · Post by **Yi-Long** » 22 Jan 2009, 18:57

Another in-depth analysis from Romero....(!)

Just curious though, Hung: What kind of woman are YOU sexually interested in!? Cute innocent schoolgirls like the ones you post, or full-grown horny women!?

HungFist · Post by **HungFist** » 22 Jan 2009, 19:07

Without Romero the rest of us might seem a bit stupid from time to time

Yi-Long wrote: Just curious though, Hung: What kind of woman are YOU sexually interested in!? Cute innocent schoolgirls like the ones you post, or full-grown horny women!?

Someone cute (that's about half looks, half character), nice and about my age. A cute university girl, in other words. The seifuku girls are too young for me.

I hate slutty women. Can't stand them.

Yi-Long · Post by **Yi-Long** » 22 Jan 2009, 19:40

HungFist wrote:Without Romero the rest of us might seem a bit stupid from time to time

... can you imagine how low our respect for Brad would be if we wouldnt even have had a Romero here!?

I kid I kid...

Yi-Long wrote: Just curious though, Hung: What kind of woman are YOU sexually interested in!? Cute innocent schoolgirls like the ones you post, or full-grown horny women!?
Someone cute (that's about half looks, half character), nice and about my age. A cute university girl, in other words. The seifuku girls are too young for me.

I hate slutty women. Can't stand them.

I dont care for slutty women either, but I don't want TOO cute and innocent either. I like them to be relaxed, easy-going, sporty, and a bit tom-boyish if possible....

Like I said, the 'seifuku' girls as you call them, are a bit 'too' OTT 'cute' for my liking. Obviously, you cant judge a book on it's cover, so perhaps whenever they drop the 'perfect girl' act I'd instantly fall in love with them, but judged purely on the kawaii pictures they do very little for me...

In terms of looks, sexually, the picture of the girl I posted (Natsuko Tohno) is pretty much perfect: not skinny, not fat, but perfectly curved and healthy, great eyes, and a nice half-long/hort haircut. And obviously asian.

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 22 Jan 2009, 20:09

Yi-Long wrote:edit: and to get this thread back on track....

WTF that goldfish bowl is weird!

I find women attractive personally not little girls, but that's all I'll say on the matter as I appreciate Hung's tastes are different.

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 23 Jan 2009, 00:36

Yi-Long wrote:TBH, none of Hung's pictures managed to sexually arouse/excite me, but maybe that's just because I'm not really into cute girly girls who pretend to be innocent......but obviously, there will always be many who ARE sexually attracted to cute young innocent women... and when it's a girl that I find attractive, so would I. But the pics that Hung posted did very little for me in that regard, and they also werent meant that way, so I guess in that regard they served their purpose...

I have to admit I never actually looked that closely at the pics before I posted the comment (which was intended as a laugh). I assumed they were the same kind of pretty girls that Hung usually posts. I like pretty girl-next-door types. Brad likes massive tits. Mind you so do I. Hell, I'm just easy pleased. As long as they have a pulse, eh...?

I guess I've just never thought of any adult girl as cute in a non-sexual way. I don't really understand that way of thinking. But then I'm not Japanese so it's obviously a cultural thing...

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 23 Jan 2009, 01:55

Markgway wrote:Brad likes massive tits.

He does indeed but those comments were really directed at Glamour Models, real life it's quit different.

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 23 Jan 2009, 01:59

So if Lucy Pinder offered herself to you in REALITY you'd say "no thanks, love, I only like big tits in mags"?

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 23 Jan 2009, 02:02

I'd have my pants round my ankles quicker than you can say "Lucy Pinder has massive boobs"

.

grim_tales · Post by **grim_tales** » 23 Jan 2009, 09:26

I feel bad for saying some girls that Hung posted were cute now

HungFist · Post by **HungFist** » 23 Jan 2009, 13:12

grim_tales wrote:I feel bad for saying some girls that Hung posted were cute now

Why? They were all cute.

Yi-Long · Post by **Yi-Long** » 23 Jan 2009, 13:34

Well... just in case... I reported Grim to the paedo-police....

grim_tales · Post by **grim_tales** » 23 Jan 2009, 13:46

*Grim runs for cover*
I liked some of the girls in glasses, the one in the sailor suit, the one in the jumper-dress, and Snow-Girl.

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 23 Jan 2009, 20:04

grim_tales wrote:*Grim runs for cover*
I liked some of the girls in glasses, the one in the sailor suit, the one in the jumper-dress, and Snow-Girl.

All of them then?

And stop apologizing for everything.

It's OK to be turned on by attractive young women.

Don't let Hung Fist give you any shit.

Yi-Long · Post by **Yi-Long** » 23 Jan 2009, 21:12

Markgway wrote:
grim_tales wrote:*Grim runs for cover*
I liked some of the girls in glasses, the one in the sailor suit, the one in the jumper-dress, and Snow-Girl.
And stop apologizing for everything.

Mark's right, Grim! Tell him you're sorry!!!

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 23 Jan 2009, 22:37

Grim's scarred his Mum is reading this

.