Carlito's Way - HD-DVD v R1CE

EvaUnit02 · Post by **EvaUnit02** » 10 Apr 2008, 17:22

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 10 Apr 2008, 17:54

Cheers Eva, and Lourdes for hosting it.

It looks like a solid upgrade. The HD-DVD looks to have all the UE extras.

For anyone wondering my DVD is:

1. Original Non-Anamorphic R1
2. Remastered Anamorphic R1 CE - This one. It's also the current DVD outside North America and outside of North America has DTS too (otherwise the same).
3. Anamorphic R1 Dual Sided UE - A bit more extras than other releases and DTS this time.

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 11 Apr 2008, 00:56

bradavon wrote:For anyone wondering my DVD is:

1. Original Non-Anamorphic R1
2. Remastered Anamorphic R1 CE - This one. It's also the current DVD outside North America and outside of North America has DTS too (otherwise the same).
3. Anamorphic R1 Dual Sided UE - A bit more extras than other releases and DTS this time.

Why keep the shitty old non-16:9 job?

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 11 Apr 2008, 01:08

I haven't.

Why would I own three DVDs of the same film? Especially when one has rubbish PQ (I used to own it) and the other two have the same PQ. I do also own the HD-DVD too though. If I owned all three DVDs, don't you think they'd be in this comparison?

.

Re-read it

. Knowing you, you'll re-read it, be pedantic and say the same thing

As you're being pedantic, so will I 8). 16:9 is an aspect ratio, nothing more. It's not another way of saying anamorphic or 16:9 Enhanced.

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 11 Apr 2008, 18:23

Here are a few more from the R1 CE SD DVD. I don't know if these problems exist on the HD-DVD:

* 1 frame after capture 1 in the first post. Notice the fleck mark:

https://www.bulletsnbabesdvd.com/forums/ ... b.r1ce.jpg

* 3 frames before capture 4:

https://www.bulletsnbabesdvd.com/forums/ ... b.r1ce.jpg

* 2 frames before capture 4:

https://www.bulletsnbabesdvd.com/forums/ ... c.r1ce.jpg

The frames before and after these two captures aren't interlaced.

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 11 Apr 2008, 21:35

bradavon wrote:Why would I own three DVDs of the same film? Re-read it . Knowing you, you'll re-read it, be pedantic and say the same thing

Re-read and it sounds like you're saying you own three different editions. Why blame me for your mistake?

As you're being pedantic, so will I 8). 16:9 is an aspect ratio, nothing more. It's not another way of saying anamorphic or 16:9 Enhanced.

I wasn't being pedantic. You just gave a false impression. Is anything ever your fault? And you knew exactly what I meant with '16:9' so stop being a smart arse.