Bullets 'n' Babes

R1
http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/4496/deadlydvd1.jpg

BD
http://img202.imageshack.us/img202/7639/deadly1.jpg

R1
http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/3691/deadlydvd2.jpg

BD
http://img686.imageshack.us/img686/1359/deadly2.jpg
R1
http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/8070/deadlydvd3.jpg

BD
http://img683.imageshack.us/img683/1133/deadly3.jpg

R1
http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/4729/deadlydvd4.jpg

BD
http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/6509/deadly4.jpg

R1
http://img97.imageshack.us/img97/5219/deadlydvd5.jpg

BD
http://img31.imageshack.us/img31/7232/deadly5.jpg

Thanks mate!

I know it's terrible LOL, but on Blu-Ray, it looks video-like with slight posterisation.

However, it's genuine HD and generally alright (maybe titles vary) . Are there embedded interlacing artefacts on David Chiang's featurette?

You have to take into account jpeg compression on the BD caps. The actual disc will look better.

The disc looks great.just watched it.

Thanks salty .

Can you tell me if there's artefacts on the featurette?

chenlung wrote:
Can you tell me if there's artefacts on the featurette?

i don't know,i haven't watched it.when i get a chance i'll have a look and let you know.

chenlung wrote:
Can you tell me if there's artefacts on the featurette?

David Chiang featurette



Uploaded with ImageShack.us



Uploaded with ImageShack.us



Uploaded with ImageShack.us



Uploaded with ImageShack.us



Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Thanks mate.

The featurette is meant to be interlaced I believe, but when you de-interlace the video, do they still show (you don't need to post caps)? It was a problem on the DVD (Ti Lung's was fine), but wondered if it was corrected for the Blu-Ray?

Nice to see David Chiang still rockin' the mullet look.

Markgway wrote:Nice to see David Chiang still rockin' the mullet look.

We asians love the mullet. It's aerodynamic.

chenlung wrote:Thanks mate.

The featurette is meant to be interlaced I believe, but when you de-interlace the video, do they still show (you don't need to post caps)? It was a problem on the DVD (Ti Lung's was fine), but wondered if it was corrected for the Blu-Ray?

why was it meant to be interlaced?

It's giving an interlaced flag to stuff that's film-based I'm against, but if something's shot and intended interlaced, that's fine.

In a bizarre case, I think MB accidentally encoded the video with embedded interlacing going on. See the DVD.