Page 1 of 2
Posted: 17 Sep 2008, 11:10
by Killer Meteor
I never understood the praises Gil had for Dimension transfers. They're quite ugly with bad artefacting and edge enhancement
Posted: 17 Sep 2008, 11:14
by chenlung
Ivan Drago wrote:I never understood the praises Gil had for Dimension transfers. They're quite ugly with bad artefacting and edge enhancement
They looked decent to me.
Some of them do have edge enhancement, but they often look better than others doing them.
Posted: 17 Sep 2008, 13:47
by bradavon
chenlung wrote:Maybe Brad's quote (in your signature) applies to me
Huh?
Posted: 17 Sep 2008, 13:48
by chenlung
bradavon wrote:chenlung wrote:Maybe Brad's quote (in your signature) applies to me
Huh?
Was Mark not accusing me of being racist?
Posted: 17 Sep 2008, 16:23
by Markgway
No. I was disagreeing with your assessment that Dimension has better blacks.
Posted: 17 Sep 2008, 16:29
by chenlung
Markgway wrote:No. I was disagreeing with your assessment that Dimension has better blacks.
It doesn't have contrast-boosting rather.
The internet, eh?
Posted: 18 Sep 2008, 14:26
by bradavon
You're both Scottish
.
Posted: 19 Sep 2008, 02:45
by eon
Got my copy yesterday, and watched a bit this morning before work - picture looks nice, though there was a bit of shimmering in the picture? Did anyone else notice this? (kinda like it was pulsing from dark to light in some scenes (it's certainly not overpowering, and I've seen this on other movies too))...
Also, I did actually see some weird motion blur that people have mentioned affected Tai Chi Master as well (which I didn't notice... I'll probably notice it on that DVD now, bastards!).