New "Terminator" Trilogy Planned

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 26 Mar 2009, 13:41

James Cameron on the Past, Present, and Future of Terminator:

http://www.terminatorchronicles.com/jam ... erminator/

EvaUnit02 · Post by **EvaUnit02** » 26 Mar 2009, 15:18

bradavon wrote:Thanks. I just meant it's all happening too soon. To be more believable it should be at least 2030-2050 etc... Although like you say this would screw up the time line.

I'd imagine that a self-aware AI that's much smarter than a human, would work at a much much faster rate. Hence the rapid development and evolution of technology in such a short time span.

Also the idea in TSCC of using time travel to send agents back into the past to develop future tech (eg the aerial Hunter-Killer), lay down infrastructures, secure resources (eg the metals used to make Terminator endoskeletons), etc. is another good explanation.

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 08 May 2009, 16:54

TERMINATOR: SALVATION only a '12' certificate(!)

http://www.bbfc.co.uk/website/Classifie ... enDocument

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 15 May 2009, 23:29

From Melonfarmers:

"Director McG has said that he cut a topless scene of Moon Bloodgood from Terminator Salvation because it felt gratuitous when he looked at it during the edit.

McG said: It just felt like: 'Oh, there's the genre stunt of the good looking girl taking her top off.' It felt counterproductive in the spirit of what we were looking to achieve on a storytelling level.

He said: I suspect it will be on the DVD. I don't know, ask Moon. She was very passionate in sort of a third-wave feminist take on the whole thing. It was a fun conversation to have.

The director had previously said that he would not remove the half-naked scene in order to receive a lower age classification for the movie from the MPAA."

Bring back the tits!!

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 16 May 2009, 03:02

I'm surprised a director like McG would take such a stance but good on him. Include it has deleted scenes, instead.

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 17 May 2009, 00:17

bradavon wrote:I'm surprised a director like McG would take such a stance but good one him.

He cut the tits, dude!!

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 17 May 2009, 12:48

I know.

romerojpg · Post by **romerojpg** » 17 May 2009, 13:41

He did not. Bale is still in the film and he is a massive Tit.

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 18 May 2009, 02:31

gasteropod · Post by **gasteropod** » 20 May 2009, 22:03

Two reviews I've seen of the film so far have given it 2/5:

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbc ... /905199991

http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/37321/te ... salvation/

IronMonkey · Post by **IronMonkey** » 20 May 2009, 22:37

Roger Ebert states he hasn't even seen The Terminator in that review!

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 21 May 2009, 01:42

McG always was a risk but so far I'm still optimistic.

IronMonkey · Post by **IronMonkey** » 21 May 2009, 08:28

You what?

grim_tales · Post by **grim_tales** » 21 May 2009, 08:51

He's still optimistic, IM even though McG is a risk as director.

Ebert hasn't seen the original Terminator?! What!

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 21 May 2009, 19:08

IronMonkey wrote:You what?

IronMonkey · Post by **IronMonkey** » 21 May 2009, 23:02

grim_tales wrote:He's still optimistic, IM even though McG is a risk as director.
Ebert hasn't seen the original Terminator?! What!

Yeah but thats not what he said! Re-read it! I was like, you what?! "I'm optimization is still high" made me wonder what bradavon was smoking!

grim_tales · Post by **grim_tales** » 22 May 2009, 12:58

I know thats not he said, but I can guess what he MEANT

EvaUnit02 · Post by **EvaUnit02** » 22 May 2009, 13:41

No, Brad is a Terminator. He downloaded the new film, but his brain's OS isn't yet optimised enough to run it properly.