I am against censor cuts; what I meant was they classify the films too leniently. The Dark Knight should've been a '15'. And had the movie been a low budget number about a character called "Fatman" it almost certainly would have been. Terminator 3 is another example. I could come up with plenty more if I had time to think about it...bradavon wrote:I thought you were against all forms of cuts?
Likely cuts made to The Dark Knight DVD.
- Markgway
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 20177
- Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04
- grim_tales
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 22081
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
- Location: St. Albans, UK
-
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 6868
- Joined: 03 Nov 2004, 18:16
- grim_tales
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 22081
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
- Location: St. Albans, UK
I thought it was strong for a 12A too. But I do get annoyed when parents obviously made a decision to go and see it with their children, and then complain the bloody film is too violent. Tough shit. They made that decision, the film is how it is and they may be (partly) the reason why the film is possibly cut on DVD
-
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 9101
- Joined: 08 Feb 2005, 14:39
- Location: Wellywood, Kiwiland
- Contact:
- bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
Roughly equivalent to the 12A of today right? -
Those aged 5 and over admitted, but parents advised that they may not wish children under 14 to watch the film.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of ... rtificates
Yeah I can see why at the time 12 would be considered too low.
Those aged 5 and over admitted, but parents advised that they may not wish children under 14 to watch the film.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of ... rtificates
Yeah I can see why at the time 12 would be considered too low.
- Markgway
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 20177
- Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04
For the strong language and a moderately gruesome scene in which The Terminator's hand is punched thru a cop's chest. In the US it was given an 'R' for those reasons. To me it pushes the film into the '15' category. Not by much - but just.EvaUnit02 wrote:Agreed, T3 violence was pathetic compared to T2. It pretty much all off screen ie the Terminatrix assassinating John Connor's lieutenants.
- Markgway
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 20177
- Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04
Actually the 'A' was the equivilent of a 'PG'. There was no equivilent to a '12' back then. It was 'U' 'A' 'AA' (roughly a '15') and X (or '18'). Jaws should be at least a '12' today as it's pretty horrific for kids. The BBFC let Spielberg away with murder. See also Raiders of the Lost Ark and Jurassic Park.bradavon wrote:Roughly equivalent to the 12A of today right? -
Those aged 5 and over admitted, but parents advised that they may not wish children under 14 to watch the film.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of ... rtificates
Yeah I can see why at the time 12 would be considered too low.
- grim_tales
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 22081
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
- Location: St. Albans, UK
- bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
I cannot remember that scene (any pictures?) so will have to ignore that bit but I don't recall the swearing being too bad.Markgway wrote:For the strong language and a moderately gruesome scene in which The Terminator's hand is punched thru a cop's chest.
12A is pretty high as it is, kids can handle the odd bit of swearing. Besides the tone was so comical for most of the film. For that reason 12 was a better rating.
I first thought that but that info above makes it sound more like a 12A but I see what you're saying. PG is more likely.Markgway wrote:Actually the 'A' was the equivilent of a 'PG'.
Agreed. I forgot it was as the DVD releases are all 12 anyway, due to the extras but that means it's effectively a 12. I doubt many parents read the VERY small print explaining why it's a 12.Markgway wrote:Jaws should be at least a '12' today as it's pretty horrific for kids.
Why on earth should it be a 12?grim_tales wrote:Jurassic Park should really have been a 12 IMO.
PG is perfect. It's all fantasy violence, like Lord of the Rings. I agree in some examples but you guys are being way too harsh on kids. They're more intelligent then most adults give them credit.
- grim_tales
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 22081
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
- Location: St. Albans, UK
-
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 6868
- Joined: 03 Nov 2004, 18:16
- Markgway
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 20177
- Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04
The BBFC got a lot of complaints about Lord of the Rings being a PG. Hence why the second and third parts were 12s.
I seem to remember someone being bitten in half in Jurassic Park - or was that The Lost World? It was still too scary for pre-teens though. In the US it was PG-13.
The most ludicrous PG of all time remains Airplane. That should be a '15'.
I seem to remember someone being bitten in half in Jurassic Park - or was that The Lost World? It was still too scary for pre-teens though. In the US it was PG-13.
The most ludicrous PG of all time remains Airplane. That should be a '15'.
- grim_tales
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 22081
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
- Location: St. Albans, UK
-
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 6868
- Joined: 03 Nov 2004, 18:16
I think the guy who gets pulled off the toilet by the T-Rex gets visibly chomped in half and thrown in the air or something. The whole car attack scene with the T-Rex is pretty intense though, with the kids stuck in there screaming and being crushed into the ground. I remember the spitter dinosaur freaking me out a bit too because of the venom in the eyes.Markgway wrote:I seem to remember someone being bitten in half in Jurassic Park - or was that The Lost World?
- bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
Interesting. I didn't know that. It's clearly fantasy violence but agreed all three should be 12.Markgway wrote:The BBFC got a lot of complaints about Lord of the Rings being a PG. Hence why the second and third parts were 12s.
WTF! 15 definitely.Markgway wrote:The most ludicrous PG of all time remains Airplane. That should be a '15'.
That scene was so comical though. I seem to recall you see him eaten in half but it's done very subtly. I don't believe you see his body get thrown.gasteropod wrote:I think the guy who gets pulled off the toilet by the T-Rex gets visibly chomped in half and thrown in the air or something.
- luckystars
- Royal Tramp
- Posts: 1893
- Joined: 12 Sep 2005, 09:01
-
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 6868
- Joined: 03 Nov 2004, 18:16
- luckystars
- Royal Tramp
- Posts: 1893
- Joined: 12 Sep 2005, 09:01
- Markgway
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 20177
- Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04
Lol... yeah, that bit made me jump when I saw it at the cinema.gasteropod wrote:I remember the spitter dinosaur freaking me out a bit too because of the venom in the eyes.
A child will see it differently to an adult. Children believe in monsters and fantasy figures in a way adults don't. They don't process what they've seen by thinking "oh this is a great effect" then think "a bloke's just been torn in half... yikes" -- or something.bradavon wrote:That scene was so comical though. I seem to recall you see him eaten in half but it's done very subtly. I don't believe you see his body get thrown.
- Markgway
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 20177
- Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04
A clever scene in that it unnerves without doing anything to threaten the PG rating. There's simply nothing to cut.luckystars wrote:I think the start of Jurassic Park 2 was far more violent, and the horror of the kiddies being attacked was only implied by sounds and bloody water in a stream?
I'm one of the few who preferred The Lost World. I thought it was more exciting, wittier, better written and acted. Only the final act wasn't necessary; they should've saved that for Part 3.gasteropod wrote:I don't think that affected me, although I doubt any of that tepid film did to be honest
- bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
- luckystars
- Royal Tramp
- Posts: 1893
- Joined: 12 Sep 2005, 09:01