Toge's nice birds topic

Yi-Long · Post by **Yi-Long** » 15 Apr 2008, 18:32

bradavon wrote:

Nice, although her hip-section looks a bit too thin, possibly photoshopped (badly)

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 15 Apr 2008, 18:36

Well spotted.

Definitely "touched up". That's basically a given today. The swimsuit she is wearing is very attractive.

I saw on the News some (note: not many) models are complaining about this, saying it's way OTT. There was a photo of Catherine Zeta Jones and she'd been altered so much it looked NOTHING like her any more.

Yi-Long · Post by **Yi-Long** » 15 Apr 2008, 19:32

bradavon wrote:Well spotted.

Definitely "touched up". That's basically a given today. The swimsuit she is wearing is very attractive.

I saw on the News some (note: not many) models are complaining about this, saying it's way OTT. There was a photo of Catherine Zeta Jones and she'd been altered so much it looked NOTHING like her any more.

Must be talking about this pic:

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 15 Apr 2008, 19:35

OMG! That's scary.

IronMonkey · Post by **IronMonkey** » 15 Apr 2008, 22:12

OMG! I love Keeley.

More pictures please!

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 16 Apr 2008, 02:25

Holy funbags!!!

EvaUnit02 · Post by **EvaUnit02** » 18 Apr 2008, 16:23

Ukrainian glamour model, Luba (Shumeyko). NSFW obviously.

Yi-Long · Post by **Yi-Long** » 18 Apr 2008, 16:25

Luba does absolutely nothing for me. Really a plain jane. Ugly face.

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 18 Apr 2008, 17:58

She's pretty.

Yi-Long · Post by **Yi-Long** » 18 Apr 2008, 18:00

We have dead plants in the garden with more expression than Luba...

gasteropod · Post by **gasteropod** » 18 Apr 2008, 18:53

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 17 Jun 2008, 01:09

In honour of Firefox 3 being released any hour now, I thought I'd post this picture, of this lovely lady 8) -

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 17 Jun 2008, 19:36

She's certainly a fox. 8)

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 17 Jun 2008, 19:41

No, she's a Fire Fox

.

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 18 Jun 2008, 01:45

That was kinda the joke I was making but never mind.... 8)

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 28 Jun 2008, 17:09

Have you guys seen the latest Front magazine? It has some absolutely stonking photos of the latest Page 3 lovelies:

These two are particularly incredible, the second is my current wallpaper 8) -

And a couple of bonus photos, starring Vikki Blows (what a name!) -

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 28 Jun 2008, 18:28

Some cockstiffening images there, Brad.

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 28 Jun 2008, 18:48

I thought you'd appreciate them

.

Check out the magazine if you see it in the shops, it's awesome. If it didn't cost so much I'd buy it, like I do with Nutts/Zoo a few times a year.

IronMonkey · Post by **IronMonkey** » 28 Jun 2008, 19:41

Where's Iga Wyrwal?!

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 28 Jun 2008, 19:46

With that many boobies, who cares? Be thankful for what we've been given

. Iga is nothing next to Peta, anyway.

Serious answer: It doesn't look like she works for Girl Management: http://www.girlmanagement.com/

romerojpg · Post by **romerojpg** » 29 Jun 2008, 00:41

Shame the quaity of the images is so shitty. Compression hell.

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 29 Jun 2008, 10:22

It's worth remembering most of the photos are scanned in from the magazine, that always degrades quality. It's obvious when you view them at full resolution.

I also always re-compress JPEGs I download to 90%. It reduces the size by loads. If you want the originals you can find them via Google, that's how I found them all (many typing in "front famous five"). They maybe more to your liking.

I doubt anyone else will be able to tell the difference. I never can at 10% reduction. you need to go lower than 80% (20% reduction) before it starts becoming noticeable.

romerojpg · Post by **romerojpg** » 29 Jun 2008, 13:52

When your looking at them on a 40 inch screen at 1080 resolution you they suck

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 29 Jun 2008, 14:59

It's not a good idea to upscale them to 1920x1080. Except for one of them (which is larger), none are anywhere near that resolution.

Besides, you're way more fussy than most

.

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 02 Jul 2008, 23:29

Fancy licking Lucy Pinder? Hot off the press (the latest Nuts issue):