China, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Thailand, etc
bradavon
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 24430 Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 19:30
Post
by bradavon » 25 Oct 2008, 11:40
Not really. The DVD audio quality is atrocious. No one would choice to listen to it, if they were able to listen to it properly.
Last edited by bradavon on 26 Oct 2008, 11:45, edited 1 time in total.
Markgway
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 20195 Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04
Post
by Markgway » 26 Oct 2008, 03:28
bradavon wrote: No one would choice to listen to it if they were able to listen it properly.
That will be someone's signature by tomorrow.
HungFist
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 11938 Joined: 14 Dec 2005, 15:50
Location: Japan
Post
by HungFist » 26 Oct 2008, 16:42
Give up a few scenes live happily ever after with the French dvd; ok video, remastered audio and no burnt in subs.
It's ab easy choice if you compare to redux: FR look better and sounds better. Cut wise it's a draw as although it's shorter, the redux is still missing scenes, plus comes with some stupid new inserts.
bradavon
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 24430 Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 19:30
Post
by bradavon » 26 Oct 2008, 17:12
One problem: No English subs period
. Fair enough you don't mind but I've no interest in creating my own DVD.
Besides I expect Redux to get a BD release.
HungFist
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 11938 Joined: 14 Dec 2005, 15:50
Location: Japan
Post
by HungFist » 26 Oct 2008, 20:19
Will be interesting to see how Redux looks on BD, I have to admit that.
Shingster
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 4140 Joined: 08 Sep 2006, 10:14
Post
by Shingster » 27 Oct 2008, 00:07
There isn't a tremendous amount of appeal in the hard core AoT fan in the "international" edit of the film. What fans ultimately want is the longer cut in decent condition. Failing that, the new Redux isn't such a bitter pill to swallow in comparison to the French DVD.
HungFist
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 11938 Joined: 14 Dec 2005, 15:50
Location: Japan
Post
by HungFist » 27 Oct 2008, 09:44
Orig. Cut: 4.5/5 (strong)
Int. Cut: 4.5/5 (weak)
Redux: 3/5
gasteropod
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 6868 Joined: 03 Nov 2004, 18:16
Post
by gasteropod » 27 Oct 2008, 16:56
A strong 4.5 and a weak 4.5? Huh?
HungFist
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 11938 Joined: 14 Dec 2005, 15:50
Location: Japan
Post
by HungFist » 27 Oct 2008, 18:12
gasteropod wrote: A strong 4.5 and a weak 4.5? Huh?
Strong as in almost 5 and weak as in not far from 4.
Or, orig cut is better than int cut despite the rating being the same.
gasteropod
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 6868 Joined: 03 Nov 2004, 18:16
Post
by gasteropod » 27 Oct 2008, 18:45
Hahaha, so therefore they shouldn't have the same rating then should they
HungFist
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 11938 Joined: 14 Dec 2005, 15:50
Location: Japan
Post
by HungFist » 27 Oct 2008, 21:32
(you are joking, right?)
bradavon
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 24430 Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 19:30
Post
by bradavon » 27 Oct 2008, 22:35
You have to remember Gasteropod, Hung's ratings only make sense to him. Everyone else, they make no sense whatsoever
.
gasteropod
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 6868 Joined: 03 Nov 2004, 18:16
Post
by gasteropod » 27 Oct 2008, 23:06
Ah!
HungFist
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 11938 Joined: 14 Dec 2005, 15:50
Location: Japan
Post
by HungFist » 27 Oct 2008, 23:13
Brad's sense of humour I know but I'm still not 100% sure if gasteropod was joking or actually serious...
gasteropod
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 6868 Joined: 03 Nov 2004, 18:16
Post
by gasteropod » 28 Oct 2008, 01:41
Nope, I wasn't joking!
bradavon
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 24430 Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 19:30
Post
by bradavon » 28 Oct 2008, 12:09
I wasn't either
.