Yi-Long wrote:Looks ok, but seems the action is once again filmed by a spastic guy suffering from convulsions... plus ofcourse we need 5 different angles of a move within 1 second.
Grrr. I'm not at all surprised, Greengrass loves it. It worked very well in United 93 but in Bourne it's just annoying. Still at least it looks more real than the usual Hollywood stylised approach.
gojensen wrote:Next time be a good chap and link to the trailer site and not directly to the playback of the video you happened to prefer... Personally I only watch the HD trailers.
On my old AMD Athlon XP 2500+ I used to watch the 480p trailers as the HD ones never worked properly.
I'm just downloading 1080p and 720p to try on my new Core 2 Duo. I usually end up keeping the 480p version as the HD ones take up way to much disk space. 480p looks pretty good still, way better than the cruddy Hi Res. version.
Looks good
I dont like the shaky cam either (one thing that brought Supremacy down a notch compared to Identity IMO) - on the other hand the trailer is cut quickly together.
Is it the same director?
I know I get often get a bee in my bonnet over this (Brad being the usual/worst offender), but would it kill people to do a google and/or wikipedia search before they ask questions with really easy to find/common knowledge answers? You're only wasting your own time and other peoples' by asking such things.
Yep afraid so, even the other good ones are worth only one.
I really hope sales are down this year so forcing the studios to listen and make some effort next year, if not the world is full of idiots and we'll just get more drivel next year.
I must admit, I've never found any of the Bourne films in anyway disorientating. Maybe it was my misspent youth sitting near the front row during many a blockbuster.
Last edited by Shingster on 19 Aug 2007, 05:17, edited 1 time in total.
bradavon wrote:Yep afraid so, even the other good ones are worth only one.
I really hope sales are down this year so forcing the studios to listen and make some effort next year, if not the world is full of idiots and we'll just get more drivel next year.
Pirates 3 & Spidey 3 are already 2 of the highest grossing films of all time, so what do you reckon?
4/5
Terrific seat-of-your-pants chase film. A lean and fit script, great editing, impressively choreographed fights and stunts. Definitely the best Hollywood blockbuster of the year (not a hard achievement considering the stacks of shit that we've had in 2007).
IMO The shaky cam worked (but I sat in the very back row, centre). I easily followed what was going on (even though I had less than 3 hours sleep the night before); probably helped that I've seen both Supremacy and United 93 several times on DVD.
Greengrass' political commentary was a welcome addition (albeit it being terribly blunt and high school essay level) and added a tiny bit more depth. Don't expect something on par with United 93 though, lol.
bradavon wrote:I'd say Ultimatum is on the same level as United '93. They're in entirely different genres but both are of excellent quality.
Re-read my paragraph. I was talking specifically about the depth of Greengrass' political discussions in each film, not the overall quality of the movies.