What general film/series have you just seen.. marks out of 5

Film Reviews and Release Comparisons
Post Reply
User avatar
grim_tales
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 22155
Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
Location: St. Albans, UK

Post by grim_tales »

Ace Ventura: Pet Detective - 4/5

Pretty stupid, but good fun film :D

Grindhouse Trailer Classics

I was surprised I'd heard of some of these (Last House On The Left, I Spit On Your Grave, The Street Fighter, Coffy, They Call Her One-Eye etc) - and I quite liked The Street Fighter but some other films they show trailers for look truly appalling :D
saltysam
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 9357
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 19:27

Post by saltysam »

Cloverfield 3.5/5

I enjoyed this, another in the camcorder footage type movies.this one has a decent budget though and after a boring first 20 minutes the movie never lets up.at 74 minutes before credits it doesn't outstay it's welcome.
saltysam
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 9357
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 19:27

Post by saltysam »

Next 2/5

Bland,by the numbers Nicolas Cage actioner is worth a rental at best.one of the less impressive HD-DVD transfers i've seen as well.
User avatar
HungFist
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 11906
Joined: 14 Dec 2005, 15:50
Location: Japan
Contact:

Post by HungFist »

Night Visions 2008. Asian and non-asian reviews mixed because you get a better image if you can read the comments in cronological order. Also, for understandable reasons (you'll see later), I'm a little tired right now and may not be able to produce my best critiques...

Friday: Warm Up Night

Doomsday (UK/USA, 2008) - 4,5/5
One thing you don’t find in Doomsday is originality. Aliens, Mad Max and Escape From New York... they’re all here in remixed form. But it’s not a problem as Marshall’s movie is every bit equal to those classics. The director has put up a Tarantino type of best of compilation, but it’s a bloody impressive post apocalypse cocktail that will drop your jaw more than once. And, despite the larger budjet, Marshall hasn’t given in to the commercialism. Doomsday is easily his most hard core movie so far, both in terms of storyline and the amount of blood, separated limbs and heads shot into pieces. The only weaknesses are the unexciting intoduction scene for the main character, and one music piece during the finale. Otherwise, fucking fantastic.

Viva Django (Italy, 1966) – 3/5
Don’t let the lead actor’s name fool you, this Terence Hill movie is no comedy but a full blooded Django flick. This time the main character is an executioner who needs help in order to take revenge, and for that purpose he’s saving death sentenced men from hanging. The storyline is bit messy, but Hill takes over Franco Nero’s role suprisingly succesfully. The soundtrack is beautiful, and the ending equals the original film. Good start for a double feature that continued with...

Sukiyaki Western Django (Japan, 2007) – 4/5
Two things; Miike’s film does not only get better by repeated viewings but also benefits greatly from being viewed back to back with a 60’s Django film, in my case Ferdinando Baldi’s Viva Django (1966). Sukiyaki Western features some irritating visual tricks and is also way too obvious in its intention to become a cult movie, but for some reason none of that hurts the film. The engrish dialogue has proven problematic to some viewers, but I didn’t really find it hard to understand at all. It certainly adds something to the film.

Saturday-Sunday: Festival Night (9 pm-->)

Dante 01 (France, 2008) – 1/5
Marc Caro is best known for his collaboration with Jean-Pierre Jeunet (including the awful fantasy pic City of Lost Childen). Now he’s gone feature length solo, and results are abysmal. His tale of outer space research facility where death sentenced criminals are being used for medical experiments is loaded with offputting visual trickery, cgi shots and mad characters. He only hits the target a few times during the whole movie. The biblical references feel embarrasing at best.

[Rec] (Spain, 2007) – 2,5/5
A news reporter and her cameraman get in the middle of a zombie epidemic in a fully handheld shot Spanish horror movie. The opening is promising and although the movie remains moderately good throughout it offers very little variety. Some characters (like the policeman who’s using more time trying make the reporters shut down their camera than helping people stay alive) and the endless yelling lessen the film’s impact impact. But, it’s a good try, and offers some of the best sudden shocks in recent memory.

À l'intérieur (France, 2007) – 3,5/5
Haute Tension 2007? Not quite, but it comes close at times. Pregnant women should generally be banned from horror movies but here the trick works. The main character, despite being only days away from giving birth to her first child, is not a completely helpless victim. Still, an unborn baby in danger is a bit of a dirty trick in any terror movie, but À l'intérieur (aka Inside) is an exceptionally nasty movie. The beginning isn’t fully convincing, but the second half is a no holds barred gore ride that certainly can’t be recommended to those with a weak stomatch. On brutality scale this is even stronger stuff than Haute Tension, and also free of major plot twists.

The Candy Snatchers (USA, 1973) – 3/5
Here’s a mean spirited grindhouse movie born somewhere far behind the concervative studio system. Three sadistic criminals kidnap a 16 year old girl in hopes of good ransom money. The girl’s father however doesn’t act as expected... The Candy Snatchers is a baffling movie. It’s cruel but often funny, both intentionally and unintenionally. Some of the contrasts are amazing. Has to be seen to be believed.

Sukiyaki Western Django (Japan, 2007) – 4/5
Again. When reserved my festical ticket I had not yet decided on seeing the film on friday (which came to happen for various reasons not directly related to the film itself) and the only alternative would’ve been The Magic Sword (USA, 1962). I’ve always found medieval knight pics boring, and I was not feeling like giving the genre a new new chance at 4:15 am. So, Sukiyaki it is, again.

Three the Hard Way (USA, 1974) – 4/5
You don’t have to be a blaxploitation expert to realize that this film - starring Jim Brown, Fred Williamson and Jim Kelly – ”just may be the most fun you can have with your clothes on...” as the 10k bullets reviewer John White put it. The entire black race is in danger when a bunch of new age Hitlers are planning to insert a deadly virus, that only affects of dark colored folks, into the New York water system. The three must go the hard way and kick, punch and explode their way through the devilish cleansing armies. Terrific cast, awesome action and stylish soundtrack. A movie to keep you awake (at 6:30 am).

Which is Stronger, Karate or the Tiger (Japan, 1976) – 2,5/5
The night, no wait, it’s bright outside already, ah whatever, closes with Kazuhiko Yamaguchi’s super rare karate actioner (sometimes incorrectly mistaken as Dragon Princess) starring Yasuaki Kurata and Toei’s greatest kick & punch villain; Masashi Ishibashi. Kurata’s fight in the tower of death is decent martial arts fun, but the cameraman is misplaced in the middle of the furious fights (half of the time the poor fella seems to dodging kicks instead of capturing the action on film). Good female characters are nowhere to be found in this pic, but at least it’s got two decent baddies; Ishibashi and, of course, the deadly tiger.

Sunday, 10:30 am: still alive, although very hungry and tired. Now looking forward to the next Nigh Visions...
gasteropod
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 6868
Joined: 03 Nov 2004, 18:16

Post by gasteropod »

Monster: 3.5/5

It was all right, that Charleze however it's spelt looked like the woman in question and did a good job portraying her.
User avatar
bradavon
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 24430
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30

Post by bradavon »

I thought Monster was overrated too. It's okay but nothing special.

Dawn of the Dead (1978) - Theatrical Director's Cut

6 out of 10


I presume it was the Theatrical Director's Cut the running time suggested it was (128 mins).

First the good:

* Prior to Dawn of the Dead the only Zombie movies I've only seen are Shaun of the Dead (if that counts) and Resident Evil before. Dawn of the Dead is considerably better.
* The zombies were cool, looked effective and walked how I'd imagine zombies to walk. They're handled much better than how they are in Resident Evil.
* It had that usual 70s feel to it. 70s clothes, cheap look etc . . .
* The music was very effective in places.
* The zombie imagery in places has become very iconic.
* I loved how Romero used the Shopping Mall to make a statement about commercialism, even if it wasn't in the slightest bit subtle.
* When we see the extent to which they've create a world for themselves it's more shocking than seeing Zombies eating flesh from people. They're really no better than the Zombies.
* It kept me mostly entertained.

Now the bad:

* Are we supposed to have seen Night of the Living Dead first? Because the film starts right in the thick of it.
* There was no attempt to explain how The Zombies become what they had.
* Dawn of the Dead is way too bloody long. At 90/100 minutes it would have been considerably stronger. I hear Argento's cut is 16 minutes shorter but he cuts out the satire which is the best part and besides 16 minutes isn't enough.

The length seriously hurts the film, whole segments could have gone without hurting the film at all. What did Argento specifically cut?

It's certainly overrated, it's not as good as Halloween and I wish Anchor Bay would release Withnail and I on BD. Now that I'd buy in an instant. I don't think I'll bother with the other Romero Zombie films, if this is supposed to be the best one.
saltysam
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 9357
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 19:27

Post by saltysam »

there's no real need to have seen NOTLD first but why wouldn't you start a series of films at the beginning :? Dawn is an easy 10/10 for me,classic.
working class blu-ray fan
saltysam
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 9357
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 19:27

Post by saltysam »

Hamburger Hill 2/5

Vietnam war movies by their nature are very similar and this one offers nothing new.an ok watch.

Heartbreak Kid 2/5

This comedy has a serious problem-it's not very funny and it's overlong.entertaining enough,it makes the fatal error of sidelining the film's best character halfway through.Ben Stiller plays Ben Stiller,nothing new there.
User avatar
bradavon
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 24430
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30

Post by bradavon »

saltysam wrote:there's no real need to have seen NOTLD first but why wouldn't you start a series of films at the beginning :?
Fair question.

Because I'd not seen any of them and had a feeling Zombie films weren't for me (like old school Martial Arts, except for Bruce Lee) and I understand Dawn is the best, so wanted to start with the best of them.

As I found it good but overrated I won't be bothering with the other Living Dead films in the Romero sixogy (or whatever it's called). I've certainly no interest in the soon to be recent three. Like First Blood, Rambo 2 and Rambo 3, Dawn passed the time nicely and I enjoyed it but it's just so overrated, and not something I have any interest in returning to.

It's much better than Evil Dead 2. I'll give it that.

I presume Dawn does thematically follow on from NOTLD? If so it would explain why Dawn just starts in the middle of it all. Is any explanation given in NOTLD or Day of the Dead to how they become zombies?
User avatar
Markgway
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 20188
Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04

Post by Markgway »

bradavon wrote:I presume it was the Theatrical Director's Cut the running time suggested it was (128 mins).
Yeah, European cut runs 119m; Extended cut 139m.
* Are we supposed to have seen Night of the Living Dead first? Because the film starts right in the thick of it.
It doesn't make much difference. NIGHT also starts with the zombies already loose. There's no direct connection between the two films in terms of character or plot.
* Dawn of the Dead is way too bloody long. At 90/100 minutes it would have been considerably stronger. I hear Argento's cut is 16 minutes shorter but he cuts out the satire which is the best part and besides 16 minutes isn't enough.
Argento's cut is only about 9 mins shorter. It's the weakest of the three. I actually preferred the longest cut, as it has the most characterization.
What did Argento specifically cut?
The satire, character stuff. He wanted a more stripped down action-horror movie.
It's certainly overrated, it's not as good as Halloween and I wish Anchor Bay would release Withnail and I on BD.
I prefer DAWN to Halloween, myself.
Image
User avatar
bradavon
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 24430
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30

Post by bradavon »

Thanks Mark.

I presume Romero never explains how the zombies become zombies? That seems like a bit of a cop out to me. I also presume Argento cut the scenes showing their "home" etc... The film would be seriously hurt without those.
EvaUnit02
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 9142
Joined: 08 Feb 2005, 14:39
Location: Wellywood, Kiwiland
Contact:

Post by EvaUnit02 »

bradavon wrote:Thanks Mark.

I presume Romero never explains how the zombies become zombies? That seems like a bit of a cop out to me
On the emergency broadcasts in NotLD, the scientists theorised that it was radiation from Venus or some such rubblish.

The origins of the zombies doesn't matter really, the human survivors in the films wouldn't have known anyway. It's not fricking cop out either, not everything in the medium of cinema has to be explained for dimwitted audiences, ambiguity is allowed.
User avatar
bradavon
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 24430
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30

Post by bradavon »

Thanks.

Fair enough not a cop out, as like you implied it does work well in Dawn not knowing but it is still kind of a crucial plot point. I'd imagine to Romero it's not important, fair enough I guess.

Radiation from Venus would fit in a 1968 movie.
User avatar
HungFist
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 11906
Joined: 14 Dec 2005, 15:50
Location: Japan
Contact:

Post by HungFist »

Wasn't it a satellite? Anyway, it's not too important as long as you get the cold war reference.
saltysam
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 9357
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 19:27

Post by saltysam »

6th Day blu-ray 3/5

Pretty decent Arnie sci-fi actioner offers nothing new but is a fun two hours.ok HD transfer,not eyepopping but solid.
User avatar
bradavon
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 24430
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30

Post by bradavon »

HungFist wrote:Wasn't it a satellite? Anyway, it's not too important as long as you get the cold war reference.
How do you mean? I don't recall any Cold War references in Dawn. Are you saying the zombies have something to do with satellites?
User avatar
HungFist
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 11906
Joined: 14 Dec 2005, 15:50
Location: Japan
Contact:

Post by HungFist »

NotLD
User avatar
bradavon
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 24430
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30

Post by bradavon »

Thanks
romerojpg
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 8520
Joined: 26 Oct 2004, 14:12
Location: CLOSE TO YOUR MAMMA

Post by romerojpg »

Suprised you finally saw Dawn myself :D but dont let this one put you off seeing Night or Day (dont bother with Land or Holy Shitfest Diary).

Day and Night are very different films from Dawn, all 3 to me are vastly different in tone, and end results. Only thing they have in common is zombies and survivng. you may like Day better, its just a better made film and does not outstay its welcome at all.

Still 10/10 from me as well, I could watch it over and over again for life :D I want a longer film, the longer the better.

You may even like the Dawn 2004 remake (its not a remake at all to be honest, in any way shape or form) its a damn disturbing film, moves like lightning and is so vastly different to the Romero Dawn its a joy :D

Some people like one of them at least, I know people who hate Dawn and love Day etc.. so you may love one of em. Well one day haha
User avatar
bradavon
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 24430
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30

Post by bradavon »

I heard from many sources Dawn was the best and I also read NOTLD has very poor acting. I just suspect I won't like them much or more precisely enough to consider them keepers, okay at best.

I tend to be disappointed when I've seen an "okay" film, that I know could often easily be fixed. Dawn 2004 just looks like your average zombie genre pic without any of the satire from the original.

You can thank the Anchor Bay sale for me finally seeing Dawn. I thought I should check it out before the sale ended.
romerojpg
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 8520
Joined: 26 Oct 2004, 14:12
Location: CLOSE TO YOUR MAMMA

Post by romerojpg »

bradavon wrote: Dawn 2004 just looks like your average zombie genre pic without any of the satire from the original.
Stuff satire, its the best film for years (not seen a film as good since it came out march 2004), never mind zombie films :D
User avatar
HungFist
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 11906
Joined: 14 Dec 2005, 15:50
Location: Japan
Contact:

Post by HungFist »

Saw it in cinema on my 18th birthday...

It's a good film indeed, and was even more effective in 2004 because it was one of the first hard-R horror films to be released after the teen horror / pg-13 period. But the screenplay is really quite terrible. One cliche after another. Still, 3,5/5. The technical execution is dynamite (appart from the ugly visual look).
User avatar
bradavon
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 24430
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30

Post by bradavon »

It's the satire that makes Dawn clever, without it it's just a bland horror flick. Okay not bland as such but it would be deeply hurt.
romerojpg
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 8520
Joined: 26 Oct 2004, 14:12
Location: CLOSE TO YOUR MAMMA

Post by romerojpg »

The satire in Dawn 78 is shit, hate the way people go on about such crap things that were not even suposed to be there. Its a film set in a shopping mall, there is no satire (the director said so many times). If you see it, your just seeing what you read and want to see. Satire is in Land and Diary in spades, ruins each film beyond words!

HungFist wrote:The technical execution is dynamite (appart from the ugly visual look).
Ahh thats one point I would argue with, I think its a stunning looking film, absolutley amazing styleish look of hard contrasts and grain. Still you either like that sort of look or you dont, I adore it.
Looked amazing on HD DVD and probibly one of the best soundtracks ever put onto a dvd, hd or not.

The screenplay, well it does not have to be new and different to all that have come before to be great, I think its the perfect plot, just needed a bit more expanding of lesser charecters sadly. Too many mini unrounded people in it.

and Brad bland is not something you can call any film before you see it, average also for you can say that about any film to be honest, esspecially going by a trailer. Its far from bland and very far from average (for me and many others anyway).
User avatar
Shingster
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 4140
Joined: 08 Sep 2006, 11:14

Post by Shingster »

Take away the satire and you still have a pretty effective character thriller. It's the satire and the characterisation that makes Dawn clever. NOTLD & DOTD share these same qualities, but I think you may like NOTLD more than Dawn Brad.
Post Reply