Your 5 most wanted dvd/HD releases for 2008?
- bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
Go buy the awful American BD then .Markgway wrote:No Theatrical Cut = No Buy.
German twats.
That doesn't even work properly, you try and use the DTS (which is DVD quality DTS too!) and it causes the video to break up. Great!
Did you look at the You Tube video and how it's pushing the boundaries? Twat is just a bit OTT.
- Markgway
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 20177
- Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04
- bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
Again did you read the link I posted? I hear PIP Commentaries are actually very good.Markgway wrote:And I'm not gonna bother watching goofs or using picture-in-picture nonsense.
Which is barebones so you cannot win.Markgway wrote:Twats is about right because they could've included both versions like the French (who are twats for forcing subtitles).
Seriously get the USA BD it's the TC with no Forced subs.
- Markgway
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 20177
- Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04
- bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
You're paying a premium for HD Picture and Sound. If the German HD-DVD was only the Theatrical Cut I too would be disappointed but it wouldn't stop me getting it in the hope an Extended Cut comes along.
HD Picture and Sound are miles ahead of everything else on my wants list (obviously it cannot be cut, cropped, whatever). The first T2 DVDs were pretty shoddy. It took a good few years before Lionsgate gave us the UE. In the mean time we can enjoy T2 in HD!
If you meant the European HD-DVD releases, does it really matter? It still looks like HD, according to reviews it's not as good but it does look like HD (unlike Terminator). I don't believe the difference is enormous:
PQ 4 out of 5: http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=23209
PQ 3.5 out of 5: http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=22652
It's a pity the DTS is broken but it still has DD5.1. Remember most people only get DD5.1 (or DTS sometimes) out of HD Discs anyway.
If I "had" to have the TC I'd pick it up. I agree the French TC is effectively worthless. It's also £9.45 at DVD Pacific including postage so it's not even a premium price.
HD Picture and Sound are miles ahead of everything else on my wants list (obviously it cannot be cut, cropped, whatever). The first T2 DVDs were pretty shoddy. It took a good few years before Lionsgate gave us the UE. In the mean time we can enjoy T2 in HD!
The USA Blu-ray is HD.Markgway wrote:The USA Blu-Ray is reportedly not as good quality as the European HD releases.
If you meant the European HD-DVD releases, does it really matter? It still looks like HD, according to reviews it's not as good but it does look like HD (unlike Terminator). I don't believe the difference is enormous:
PQ 4 out of 5: http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=23209
PQ 3.5 out of 5: http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=22652
It's a pity the DTS is broken but it still has DD5.1. Remember most people only get DD5.1 (or DTS sometimes) out of HD Discs anyway.
If I "had" to have the TC I'd pick it up. I agree the French TC is effectively worthless. It's also £9.45 at DVD Pacific including postage so it's not even a premium price.
-
- Pedicab Driver
- Posts: 296
- Joined: 29 Mar 2007, 11:10
Saltysam Hard Boiled director's cut is available on french DVD from Columbia Tri Star, uncut and anamorphic, since day one. It features english tracks as well as subs.
I was excited when the original T1 remaster came out, but comparing with the original image disc in 4/3 1.85:1 on a projection screen, it appears their HD remaster in 16/9 from the special edition have totally burned whites (details at night on neon screens become unreadable) is darker and the remix in 5.1 sucks while the mono track sound less good than the image disc or the LD !
I was excited when the original T1 remaster came out, but comparing with the original image disc in 4/3 1.85:1 on a projection screen, it appears their HD remaster in 16/9 from the special edition have totally burned whites (details at night on neon screens become unreadable) is darker and the remix in 5.1 sucks while the mono track sound less good than the image disc or the LD !
- grim_tales
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 22075
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
- Location: St. Albans, UK
- grim_tales
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 22075
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
- Location: St. Albans, UK
- bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
I've corrected DVD Vision's post as it's clear he doesn't mean Hard Boiled.
Although Fox now holds the MGM back catalogue I believe Sony kept James Bond. If Fox now own the James Bond catalogue too then definitely expect Regional Coding.
It's likely but equally unlikely. Except for new films on Region A only (North America/Asia) Sony haven't been using it. Recent Region A titles of new films have been Region Free though, maybe Sony are going to be entirely Region Free.Markgway wrote:What's the betting the barstards at Sony make the James Bond series Region-Coded?
Although Fox now holds the MGM back catalogue I believe Sony kept James Bond. If Fox now own the James Bond catalogue too then definitely expect Regional Coding.
That's more likely, sadly on USA HD too.Markgway wrote:And what's the bet that there will be no mono tracks (at least on the UK discs)?
- bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
I may do the same with any 4:3 film on HD. I've not seen any 4:3 film on HD yet to comment how much I like it.
It depends which ones you mean?
The 5.1 on "From Russia with Love" is perfectly okay. Dalton onwards they're great, maybe Moore too but it's been so long since I've seen any of those to comment how well a 5.1 remix would work.
It depends which ones you mean?
The 5.1 on "From Russia with Love" is perfectly okay. Dalton onwards they're great, maybe Moore too but it's been so long since I've seen any of those to comment how well a 5.1 remix would work.
- IronMonkey
- Royal Tramp
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: 08 Dec 2004, 16:49
-
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 9357
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 19:27
No they haven't. Spider-man 3 & Hostel pt 2 were region coded A.i have Resident Evil Extinction here as an xmas present for my son and i bet that's region A only as well.bradavon wrote:
Recent Region A titles of new films have been Region Free though, maybe Sony are going to be entirely Region Free.
- bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
I meant new new titles . It's by no means conclusive just based on some super new or soon to come titles.
Since moving house 6 months ago I've not plugged my sub in though. The 5 speakers as it is piss my neighbours of enough, a sub is definitely a no no.
You must be confusing me with someone else.IronMonkey wrote:I thought you said you didn't have a 5.1 system bradavon?
Since moving house 6 months ago I've not plugged my sub in though. The 5 speakers as it is piss my neighbours of enough, a sub is definitely a no no.
- Markgway
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 20177
- Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04
Sorry, you've lost me. I was talking about James Bond. Where does 4:3 come into it?bradavon wrote:I may do the same with any 4:3 film on HD. I've not seen any 4:3 film on HD yet to comment how much I like it.
I was talking about Thunderball and OHMSS. Basically any 007 up until The Spy Who Loved Me would be a no-no remixed. After that I could live with it, even though the stereo tracks are still better (see Octopussy).The 5.1 on "From Russia with Love" is perfectly okay.
Goldeneye onward were 5.1 anyways so of course they're fine.Dalton onwards they're great, maybe Moore too but it's been so long since I've seen any of those to comment how well a 5.1 remix would work.
- bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
You said if the BD turns out to only have 5.1 you won't be upgrading.Markgway wrote:Sorry, you've lost me. I was talking about James Bond. Where does 4:3 come into it?
I said I'll likely/possibly not be upgrading any of my 4:3 films to HD and stick with the DVD. Why? I cannot stand pillar boxing!
They weren't in the Dalton Bonds but sound like proper 5.1 tracks!Markgway wrote:Goldeneye onward were 5.1 anyways so of course they're fine.
- Markgway
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 20177
- Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04
Oh, right. It was just a side comment. Nothing to do with Bond. But hang on... I presume you have widescreen TV now. So 4:3 films will be pillar boxed as it is... no? And the early Bonds were 1.66 so without overscan they would have slight bars at the sides too.bradavon wrote:You said if the BD turns out to only have 5.1 you won't be upgrading. I said I'll likely/possibly not be upgrading any of my 4:3 films to HD and stick with the DVD. Why? I cannot stand pillar boxing!
It's much easier when you're working from stereo originals. Licence to Kill was the last Stereo Bond film. I compared the pre-credits sequence of Octopussy on my R1 (which I might trade, actually...) and noticed that the stereo track had more oomph than the wider 5.1 remix. Bass is sacrificed for spread it seems.Markgway wrote:They weren't in the Dalton Bonds but sound like proper 5.1 tracks!
- bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
Correct.Markgway wrote:So 4:3 films will be pillar boxed as it is... no? And the early Bonds were 1.66 so without overscan they would have slight bars at the sides too.
Both HD resolutions are in the 16:9 aspect ratio so any ratio that doesn't fit gets pillar boxed/window boxed, as has happened for 2.35:1 for years. As 1.66:1 tends to be pretty similar to 1.78:1 I doubt the bars on the 1.66:1 Bonds will really be noticeable.
Personally I think they should've created a 4:3 aspect ratio (XXXX by 1080) but they didn't. I digress.
- grim_tales
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 22075
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
- Location: St. Albans, UK