Is this a good BD player?
- grim_tales
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 22079
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
- Location: St. Albans, UK
Is this a good BD player?
Hey,
Finally I'll be going HD soon (well, I'll have a look at TVs/players anyway), this player looks good (and cheaper than I thought it would be).
http://www.hispek.com/P/Panasonic-DMPBD ... 0EBM).aspx
A M/R DVD AND BD might be quite expensive though.
Haven't decided on a TV yet, depends how big my room is but I'm hoping between 32-37". Hi-Spek are quite expensive.
http://www.hispek.com/P/Panasonic-TXL37 ... S10B).aspx
That has 3 HDMI ports (I think). HDMI cables are very expensive
Finally I'll be going HD soon (well, I'll have a look at TVs/players anyway), this player looks good (and cheaper than I thought it would be).
http://www.hispek.com/P/Panasonic-DMPBD ... 0EBM).aspx
A M/R DVD AND BD might be quite expensive though.
Haven't decided on a TV yet, depends how big my room is but I'm hoping between 32-37". Hi-Spek are quite expensive.
http://www.hispek.com/P/Panasonic-TXL37 ... S10B).aspx
That has 3 HDMI ports (I think). HDMI cables are very expensive
- Markgway
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 20177
- Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04
- grim_tales
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 22079
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
- Location: St. Albans, UK
Re: Is this a good BD player?
Having Multi region for BD would be nice too. Although I bet that would be quite pricey.
- bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
Re: Is this a good BD player?
Well worth the extra cash though. Think of it as an investment, you'll be keeping for years. That's how I think about it.
I spent £500 for my Combo player but given that it's fully MR, also handles HD-DVD and I intend to keep it a long time I considered it worth the premium. Not that I'd spend that amount now, closer to £250-300.
I spent £500 for my Combo player but given that it's fully MR, also handles HD-DVD and I intend to keep it a long time I considered it worth the premium. Not that I'd spend that amount now, closer to £250-300.
No they're £8-10 off eBay. Don't be fooled by marketing!grim_tales wrote:HDMI cables are very expensive
- grim_tales
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 22079
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
- Location: St. Albans, UK
Re: Is this a good BD player?
How much would they be now?
- bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
Re: Is this a good BD player?
What HDMI cables? I said. If you mean my LG BH200, it was discontinued a long time ago. They occasionally popup on eBay but are super hard to find now. Not helped by the fact I had to import mine from Belgium as LG never released it here.
You really don't need HD-DVD any more. I'd get a Panasonic BD Player, look into Sony too though, they maybe cheaper. The new Samsung BD Players maybe good too. They used to be poor but maybe fine now.
Read reviews here: http://www.homecinemachoice.com/reviews_archive
Look into these two:
LG: http://www.homecinemachoice.com/reviews ... r+24+07+09
The same LG: http://www.avforums.com/forums/lg-owner ... eview.html
Panasonic: http://www.trustedreviews.com/home-cine ... -Player/p1
The LG is impressive as it can play MKV files but I'd get the Panasonic as it has Analogue Multi-channel outputs (as my Amp has the inputs, more important for me to get lossless audio). Neither are likely to interest you Grim.
EDIT: The DMP-BD60EB looks to be better for you Grim over the DMP-BD80EB as the latter has Analogue Multi-channel outputs, which you won't need (the review is for the DMP-BD80EB).
You really don't need HD-DVD any more. I'd get a Panasonic BD Player, look into Sony too though, they maybe cheaper. The new Samsung BD Players maybe good too. They used to be poor but maybe fine now.
Read reviews here: http://www.homecinemachoice.com/reviews_archive
Look into these two:
LG: http://www.homecinemachoice.com/reviews ... r+24+07+09
The same LG: http://www.avforums.com/forums/lg-owner ... eview.html
Panasonic: http://www.trustedreviews.com/home-cine ... -Player/p1
The LG is impressive as it can play MKV files but I'd get the Panasonic as it has Analogue Multi-channel outputs (as my Amp has the inputs, more important for me to get lossless audio). Neither are likely to interest you Grim.
EDIT: The DMP-BD60EB looks to be better for you Grim over the DMP-BD80EB as the latter has Analogue Multi-channel outputs, which you won't need (the review is for the DMP-BD80EB).
- grim_tales
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 22079
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
- Location: St. Albans, UK
Re: Is this a good BD player?
Thanks Brad
Earlier I meant "How much would a MR BD/DVD player be now?"
ETA: You mean with that player (BD60EB) I can just connect my current amp to it and it will be fine?
I found that one on Hi-Spek for £219, is that MR for BD also?
ETA: It says "Award winning Multi Region BLU RAY player which suggests the BR is M/Region too (I think?)
Edit again - my old amp does not have HDMI.
Earlier I meant "How much would a MR BD/DVD player be now?"
ETA: You mean with that player (BD60EB) I can just connect my current amp to it and it will be fine?
I found that one on Hi-Spek for £219, is that MR for BD also?
ETA: It says "Award winning Multi Region BLU RAY player which suggests the BR is M/Region too (I think?)
Edit again - my old amp does not have HDMI.
-
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 9357
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 19:27
Re: Is this a good BD player?
Not a chance at that price,it'll be dvd only.PC World are selling off the Sony BD i got for £99, it's a fantastic machine and at least it can be made MR for dvd.grim_tales wrote:
I found that one on Hi-Spek for £219, is that MR for BD also?
working class blu-ray fan
- bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
Re: Is this a good BD player?
What am I? Psychic . Check out Multiregion Magic.grim_tales wrote:Earlier I meant "How much would a MR BD/DVD player be now?"
Grim! I've told you several times any DD5.1/DTS amp will work just fine .grim_tales wrote:ETA: You mean with that player (BD60EB) I can just connect my current amp to it and it will be fine?
What are we? Psychic. Check out what the website says or ask them. Besides I suspect Mark is right.grim_tales wrote:I found that one on Hi-Spek for £219, is that MR for BD also?
If it doesn't specifically say it assume not. Given the price assume SD DVD though but ask.grim_tales wrote:ETA: It says "Award winning Multi Region BLU RAY player which suggests the BR is M/Region too (I think?)
Grim! I've told you several times any DD5.1/DTS amp will work just fine . HDMI is only needed for the new lossless formats (PCM/DTS-HD/TrueHD) not DD5.1/DTS. Which I seriously reckon you'll be fine with.grim_tales wrote:Edit again - my old amp does not have HDMI.
Get a TV then BD Player way before a new Amp.
- grim_tales
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 22079
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
- Location: St. Albans, UK
Re: Is this a good BD player?
Fair enough
Sam what Sony player do you have (the £99 one?)
That Panasonic player looks very good
Sam what Sony player do you have (the £99 one?)
That Panasonic player looks very good
-
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 9357
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 19:27
Re: Is this a good BD player?
i have the Sony BDPS350. I Now have around 200 blu-ray discs,a mix of Region A & B titles and of the Region A Locked ones there are maybe only 4-5 titles still not available in Region B.Not a big issue anymore imo.
working class blu-ray fan
- bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
Re: Is this a good BD player?
What about the opposite? Given that Grim will be getting Region B (UK).
I own several region locked BDs, to A or B. Enough to warrant MR for me but as you're discovering you pay a premium for this, because to make it BD MR it always has to be a "hardware" hack. Panasonics are very nice but they can be pricey. Things you won't need Grim to save costs:
1. Profile 2.0 (aka BD Live) - Profile 1.1 (aka Picture in Picture) is frankly more than fine for most - This tends to come as standard on "new models" now though.
2. 5.1 or 7.1 Analogue Multichannel outputs - Not to be confused with HDMI/Optical/Coaxial
3. On-board decoding of DTS-HD/TrueHD - If you buy a new Amp you'll be bitstreaming anyway (where the Amp decodes instead of the Player).
Without wanting to complicate things on-board is basically for people with legacy Amps but want DTS-HD/Dolby TrueHD. Whereas I'm betting you'll be fine with DD5.1/DTS (as most BD Player owners are, myself included). Remember PCM/DTS-HD/TrueHD (the three lossless formats) are always either backwards compatible to DD5.1 or DTS (or in the case of PCM a second DD5.1 track is included). So you'll always be able to get some form of 5.1.
Multichannel outputs only ever appear on top of the range models. The BDP-S350 Salty mentions looks to be Profile 2.0:
http://www.sony.co.uk/product/blu-ray-d ... r/bdp-s350
But has no On-board decoding or Analogue Multichannel. The former requires more powerful processes and latter additional connections, hence why they're the first to go. Profile 2.0 is usually just a software/firmware upgraded needed, you need additional memory but this is resolved by inserting a USB Stick (if you want to use Profile 2.0 "extras").
BD MR aside the Sony BDP-S350 looks like a decent model.
I own several region locked BDs, to A or B. Enough to warrant MR for me but as you're discovering you pay a premium for this, because to make it BD MR it always has to be a "hardware" hack. Panasonics are very nice but they can be pricey. Things you won't need Grim to save costs:
1. Profile 2.0 (aka BD Live) - Profile 1.1 (aka Picture in Picture) is frankly more than fine for most - This tends to come as standard on "new models" now though.
2. 5.1 or 7.1 Analogue Multichannel outputs - Not to be confused with HDMI/Optical/Coaxial
3. On-board decoding of DTS-HD/TrueHD - If you buy a new Amp you'll be bitstreaming anyway (where the Amp decodes instead of the Player).
Without wanting to complicate things on-board is basically for people with legacy Amps but want DTS-HD/Dolby TrueHD. Whereas I'm betting you'll be fine with DD5.1/DTS (as most BD Player owners are, myself included). Remember PCM/DTS-HD/TrueHD (the three lossless formats) are always either backwards compatible to DD5.1 or DTS (or in the case of PCM a second DD5.1 track is included). So you'll always be able to get some form of 5.1.
Multichannel outputs only ever appear on top of the range models. The BDP-S350 Salty mentions looks to be Profile 2.0:
http://www.sony.co.uk/product/blu-ray-d ... r/bdp-s350
But has no On-board decoding or Analogue Multichannel. The former requires more powerful processes and latter additional connections, hence why they're the first to go. Profile 2.0 is usually just a software/firmware upgraded needed, you need additional memory but this is resolved by inserting a USB Stick (if you want to use Profile 2.0 "extras").
Is this by a remote hack?saltysam wrote:it's a fantastic machine and at least it can be made MR for dvd.
BD MR aside the Sony BDP-S350 looks like a decent model.
-
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 9357
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 19:27
Re: Is this a good BD player?
i have about 40 Region A Locked discs.The point i was making is of those 40 only 4-5 are unavailable in Region B.And i'm sure they'll arrive sooner or later.Owning a Region B machine is not really a problem anymore imo.bradavon wrote:What about the opposite? Given that Grim will be getting Region B (UK).
Yes.bradavon wrote:Is this by a remote hack?
it's excellent and at less than a ton they are giving it away.£100 is nothing these days.bradavon wrote:BD MR aside the Sony BDP-S350 looks like a decent model.
working class blu-ray fan
-
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 8520
- Joined: 26 Oct 2004, 14:12
- Location: CLOSE TO YOUR MAMMA
Re: Is this a good BD player?
Or just wait till Grim get a screen before even considering a HD player.
- bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
Re: Is this a good BD player?
Oh yeah. I thought you meant the opposite for some reason. That's 4-5 too many if they're "must have titles" for me but I can appreciate MR means a large premium.saltysam wrote:i have about 40 Region A Locked discs.The point i was making is of those 40 only 4-5 are unavailable in Region B.
The trouble is all those small independent labels, such as Optimum for example. Given how long people keep BD Players I think it's worth the extra cost. It's not like you replace them yearly.saltysam wrote:Owning a Region B machine is not really a problem anymore imo.
Agreed. It does give Grim pretty much everything he wants/needs.saltysam wrote:And at less than a ton they are giving it away.£100 is nothing these days.
He's looking into bothromerojpg wrote:Or just wait till Grim get a screen before even considering a HD player.
Outside of reviews (to find the nitty gritty) there's less to consider with TVs. So many of them are 1080p and 24p nowadays. I was really surprised to see my brothers new 26" HD Ready (1080i) TV was even 24p. At least I think it is, it support 1:1 pixel mapping. They're the same thing right?
So you just need to read reviews to find out the finer details, as you do with BD Players.
-
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 6868
- Joined: 03 Nov 2004, 18:16
Re: Is this a good BD player?
Not at all, I'm surprised you're unaware. 1:1 pixel mapping just means there's zero overscan, every single pixel is on-screen. 24Hz is the film running at 24fps...bradavon wrote:I was really surprised to see my brothers new 26" HD Ready (1080i) TV was even 24p. At least I think it is, it support 1:1 pixel mapping. They're the same thing right?
Oh, and it won't necessarily show the image at 24Hz, I know certain Toshiba screens are merely '24Hz compatible' and converts it to the usual 50Hz.
- Markgway
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 20177
- Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04
Re: Is this a good BD player?
A lot of these companies advertise multi region blu ray players as a means of tricking you into buying something that's multi region DVD only. I know because I asked one of them about multi region blu ray in the past. Might be worth your asking to be sure but I'd be extremely surprised if it was multi for Blu.
I heard about the PC World and Tesco offers for Sony and Panasonic players for £99 but none of my local stores had anything. But then I live in a shithole. No comparable online offers unfortunately.
I heard about the PC World and Tesco offers for Sony and Panasonic players for £99 but none of my local stores had anything. But then I live in a shithole. No comparable online offers unfortunately.
-
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 9357
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 19:27
Re: Is this a good BD player?
HMV are doing a Sharp player for £99,don't know what it's like though. @Brad Optimum are Region B and a good example of why nowadays having if having one or the other Region B is the way to go.As for the 4-5 titles all are available in excellent dvd versions,will appear on B soon enough,i don't see the issue
working class blu-ray fan
- grim_tales
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 22079
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
- Location: St. Albans, UK
Re: Is this a good BD player?
This looks a pretty good TV:
http://www.pcworld.co.uk/martprd/store/ ... ionSection
Dunno if thats 24p though. It could be as it says 100Hz.
Is the contrast ratio that important?
http://www.pcworld.co.uk/martprd/store/ ... ionSection
Dunno if thats 24p though. It could be as it says 100Hz.
Is the contrast ratio that important?
-
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 6868
- Joined: 03 Nov 2004, 18:16
Re: Is this a good BD player?
Incredibly important, the higher the ratio, the more three-dimensional the image. Please bear in mind that manufacturers measure their own contrast ratios in different ways though so you can't really go by just reading their wild claims. LED backlight screens should have higher contrast ratios than standard LCDs, and the Pioneer Kuro plasmas are well-known for having the best of all (but obviously cost farrr too much).grim_tales wrote:Is the contrast ratio that important?
- grim_tales
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 22079
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
- Location: St. Albans, UK
Re: Is this a good BD player?
I was going to go for an LCD rather than a Plasma I think.
50,000 or 60,000/1 sounds good - 25,000/1 does not. I was looking to see if any were 100Hz too (that LG is), not all TV's are.
50,000 or 60,000/1 sounds good - 25,000/1 does not. I was looking to see if any were 100Hz too (that LG is), not all TV's are.
-
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 9357
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 19:27
Re: Is this a good BD player?
24fps is needed for BD ,i don't think that LG has it.
working class blu-ray fan
- grim_tales
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 22079
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
- Location: St. Albans, UK
Re: Is this a good BD player?
Ah OK
Lots of things to consider
Lots of things to consider
- grim_tales
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 22079
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
- Location: St. Albans, UK
- bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
Re: Is this a good BD player?
That's it. 1:1 Pixel Mapping on such a TV is still impressive. Okay 1080p is now common place. Not looking into a new TV I've not bothered to read up on it.gasteropod wrote:Not at all, I'm surprised you're unaware. 1:1 pixel mapping just means there's zero overscan, every single pixel is on-screen. 24Hz is the film running at 24fps...
I'd avoid this at all cost, especially as the Sony is so cheap. Who owns Sharp BD Players?saltysam wrote:HMV are doing a Sharp player for £99,don't know what it's like though.
The Orphanage isn't, for what it's worth.saltysam wrote:@Brad Optimum are Region B and a good example of why nowadays having if having one or the other Region B is the way to go.
You were the one saying they're bound to use it more in the future at some point .gasteropod wrote:As for the 4-5 titles all are available in excellent dvd versions,will appear on B soon enough,i don't see the issue
Obviously cost is a major factor here. I'm lucky. I actually bought my LG expecting it to be Region A locked but surprisingly a remote hack was found. AFAIK it's the only BD MR remote hack out there.
They're different things:grim_tales wrote:Dunno if thats 24p though. It could be as it says 100Hz.
1. 24p is the speed the film plays at.
2. 100Hz is the refresh rate of the TV, the higher the number the less flicker. Just like on PC monitors.
That's so infuriating. When I was looking for my brother. I had no idea of how to tell which was actually better. Any ideas?gasteropod wrote:Incredibly important, the higher the ratio, the more three-dimensional the image. Please bear in mind that manufacturers measure their own contrast ratios in different ways though so you can't really go by just reading their wild claims.
Aren't LED LCD TVs super expensive?gasteropod wrote:LED backlight screens should have higher contrast ratios than standard LCDs, and the Pioneer Kuro plasmas are well-known for having the best of all (but obviously cost farrr too much).
Why? Plasmas are better.grim_tales wrote:I was going to go for an LCD rather than a Plasma I think.