Karas - R1 vs. R2J

Film Reviews and Release Comparisons
Lourdes
Royal Tramp
Posts: 1992
Joined: 08 Jan 2005, 16:19
Location: UK

Karas - R1 vs. R2J

Unread post by Lourdes » 24 Nov 2007, 23:23

R1 Part 1 is progressive, Part 2 is interlaced
R2J is progressive

Last 5 caps are from Part 2

R1 Top, R2J Bottom

Image

Image


Image

Image


Image

Image


Image

Image


Image

Image


Image

Image


Image

Image


Image

Image


Image

Image


Image

Image


Image

Image


Image

Image

Lourdes
Royal Tramp
Posts: 1992
Joined: 08 Jan 2005, 16:19
Location: UK

Unread post by Lourdes » 24 Nov 2007, 23:29

AV is near identical on both. The R1 part 1 has the slightest bit of cropping compared to the R2J and it's the other way around with part 2. The R2J has the slightest of bitrate advantages but all it does is make the banding slightly more apparent. R1 part 2 may be interlaced but it deinterlaces perfectly so there's no disadvantage.

R1 is the one to have.

EvaUnit02
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 9016
Joined: 08 Feb 2005, 14:39
Location: Wellywood, Kiwiland
Contact:

Unread post by EvaUnit02 » 27 Nov 2007, 03:07

Cheers. Will you be adding R2UK caps?
Last edited by EvaUnit02 on 27 Nov 2007, 13:52, edited 1 time in total.

Lourdes
Royal Tramp
Posts: 1992
Joined: 08 Jan 2005, 16:19
Location: UK

Unread post by Lourdes » 27 Nov 2007, 11:20

I've added them to my rental list.

Lourdes
Royal Tramp
Posts: 1992
Joined: 08 Jan 2005, 16:19
Location: UK

Unread post by Lourdes » 06 Dec 2007, 12:53

Just checked part 1 R2Uk and it's NTSC>PAL.

EvaUnit02
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 9016
Joined: 08 Feb 2005, 14:39
Location: Wellywood, Kiwiland
Contact:

Unread post by EvaUnit02 » 06 Dec 2007, 13:02

Bummer, it even had a DTS track. Thanks for the info.

Post Reply