2LDK - R2FR vs. R2NL vs. R2UK vs. R3K

Film Reviews and Release Comparisons
Lourdes
Royal Tramp
Posts: 1992
Joined: 08 Jan 2005, 16:19
Location: UK

2LDK - R2FR vs. R2NL vs. R2UK vs. R3K

Unread post by Lourdes » 27 Jul 2007, 12:48

R2FR is interlaced (NTSC>PAL?)
R2NL & R2UK are NTSC>PAL
R3K is progressive and a probable R2J port

R2FR First, R2NL Second, R2UK Third, R3K Last

Image

Image

Image

Image


Image

Image

Image

Image


Image

Image

Image

Image


Image

Image

Image

Image


Image

Image

Image

Image


Image

Image

Image

Image
Last edited by Lourdes on 16 May 2008, 15:08, edited 4 times in total.

romerojpg
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 8520
Joined: 26 Oct 2004, 14:12
Location: CLOSE TO YOUR MAMMA

Unread post by romerojpg » 27 Jul 2007, 20:18

I still have not seen this :( still no great dvds out there of it. Seems like years since it came out now :(

User avatar
captainjoe
King of Beggars
Posts: 667
Joined: 24 Jul 2006, 01:46
Location: Alberta, Canada

Unread post by captainjoe » 27 Jul 2007, 21:16

R2NL has bad compression as seen in capture 4.
Image

tom2681
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 5577
Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 16:18
Location: Where you'll never find me

Unread post by tom2681 » 29 Dec 2007, 11:42

Added french caps.

French transfer has more edge-enhancement and more grain, but it doesn't have the strong yellow tint that can be found on the other discs.
Good compression as well.
Wide shots look a bit grainy, but close-ups are really sharp (see caps n°3 and 4).

Being progressive, the R3K is probably the better option.
I used to be "the man who loves the movies you hate".
Now I'm just "that weird french guy with a cat avatar who comes to BnB once a year for no reason and then disappears again".

Lourdes
Royal Tramp
Posts: 1992
Joined: 08 Jan 2005, 16:19
Location: UK

Unread post by Lourdes » 16 May 2008, 14:49

Added the R2UK, another crap PAL disc.

Post Reply