Ninja Wars: Adness R1 vs IVL R3

Film Reviews and Release Comparisons
User avatar
HungFist
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 10627
Joined: 14 Dec 2005, 15:50
Location: Japan
Contact:

Ninja Wars: Adness R1 vs IVL R3

Unread post by HungFist » 24 Sep 2006, 16:44

I’m using extra large caps becase the main difference between the discs is compression.

Top: Adness R1
Bottom: IVL R3 HK

Image
Image

Image
Image

Image
Image

Image
Image

Image
Image
(this last cap is taken with interlace killers on to make the pixelization more visible)

Both transfers are obviously based on the same source material. While Adness decided to clean their master (see cap 4),
IVL decided to compress it. Just look at the first and the last caps. The first cap looks even worse viewed on my 28” TV. I can
only imagine how it will look on a big sceen.

Both transfers are interlaced. Both dvds are also rather barebones (IVL has two trailers, Adness has 8 trailers). IVL disc is
3,89 GB in total, Adness is 6,25 GB.
Last edited by HungFist on 20 Dec 2006, 13:48, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
bradavon
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 24419
Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30

Unread post by bradavon » 24 Sep 2006, 17:11

IVL disc is 3,89 GB in total, Adness is 6,25 GB.
That says it all. What!

Is the IVL single layer? It may as well be.

User avatar
HungFist
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 10627
Joined: 14 Dec 2005, 15:50
Location: Japan
Contact:

Unread post by HungFist » 24 Sep 2006, 19:50

bradavon wrote:
IVL disc is 3,89 GB in total, Adness is 6,25 GB.
Is the IVL single layer? It may as well be.
I assume so. How do I find out? The package doesn't say anything about it.

User avatar
chenlung
King of Beggars
Posts: 901
Joined: 27 Feb 2005, 22:45
Location: Scotland

Unread post by chenlung » 25 Sep 2006, 15:11

Why the window boxing?

Adness is sharper.
Scott

Post Reply