The General HD Releases Thread!
-
romerojpg
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 8520
- Joined: 26 Oct 2004, 14:12
- Location: CLOSE TO YOUR MAMMA
-
EvaUnit02
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 9144
- Joined: 08 Feb 2005, 14:39
- Location: Wellywood, Kiwiland
- Contact:
- bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
As rumoured, Metropolis (1927) in early 2009:
http://www.highdefdigest.com/news/show/1848
I've yet to see my Eureka MOC DVD. I hear it's a classic.
http://www.highdefdigest.com/news/show/1848
I've yet to see my Eureka MOC DVD. I hear it's a classic.
-
saltysam
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 9357
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 19:27
Weinstein commence theatrical blu-ray releases with The Mist
http://www.highdefdigest.com/news/show/ ... _Mist/1857
American Werewolf In London coming to blu-ray next year
http://www.highdefdigest.com/news/show/ ... _Bite/1855
http://www.highdefdigest.com/news/show/ ... _Mist/1857
American Werewolf In London coming to blu-ray next year
http://www.highdefdigest.com/news/show/ ... _Bite/1855
working class blu-ray fan
-
EvaUnit02
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 9144
- Joined: 08 Feb 2005, 14:39
- Location: Wellywood, Kiwiland
- Contact:
- bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
Just FYI: The BD has PCM which by accounts is much better than the TrueHD on the HD-DVD (and BD).romerojpg wrote:300 £3.60 on HD DVD, or 4-5 times that price for a Blu Ray?
That's what the link says.saltysam wrote:300 will probably just carry over the extras from the hd-dvd that were missing from the origina blu-rayl release.
-
EvaUnit02
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 9144
- Joined: 08 Feb 2005, 14:39
- Location: Wellywood, Kiwiland
- Contact:
- bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
-
EvaUnit02
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 9144
- Joined: 08 Feb 2005, 14:39
- Location: Wellywood, Kiwiland
- Contact:
There's a valid argument there since you were often dealing with 384/448kbps vs 764kbps.bradavon wrote:You could say the same about DTS vs. DD5.1 but I happen to think it often sounds better.EvaUnit02 wrote:PCM and DTS-HD tracks are just louder.
With properly decoded lossless audio vs. PCM, it's just the placebo effect. The only argument you're left with is wearing a pot on your head and banging it with a wooden spoon.
Yeah, those whom not only use Itunes or WMP, but have also DSP effects turned on say the same thing.If it sounds better to me, then it's better. The technical reason why is often less important.
-
EvaUnit02
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 9144
- Joined: 08 Feb 2005, 14:39
- Location: Wellywood, Kiwiland
- Contact:
- bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
Many use Winamp. I used to but today it doesn't cut the mustard.
I use MPC for video (WMP sucks!) and WMP11 for music, which it does a fab job of doing. The screen shots I've seen of WMP12 look cool too. Not being an Ipod fan I've no use for Itunes.
, so how can it suck?
I use MPC for video (WMP sucks!) and WMP11 for music, which it does a fab job of doing. The screen shots I've seen of WMP12 look cool too. Not being an Ipod fan I've no use for Itunes.
I didn't really. I knew it was an analogy, but you still use WMPEvaUnit02 wrote:Wow, you really missed the point there. It's was an analogy.
-
EvaUnit02
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 9144
- Joined: 08 Feb 2005, 14:39
- Location: Wellywood, Kiwiland
- Contact:
You're really behind the times, Winamp is the most powerful and customisable players around, after Foobar2000. Only the clueless reckon that it's bloated.bradavon wrote:Many use Winamp. I used to but today it doesn't cut the mustard.
I don't use it, where did you get the idea that I did?bradavon wrote:I didn't really. I knew it was an analogy, but you still use WMPEvaUnit02 wrote:Wow, you really missed the point there. It's was an analogy., so how can it suck?
From my status MSN? That's a Winamp plugin, fool.
- bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
I don't think it's bloated. I dislike the interface
. I hated Media Libraries prior to WMP11, which IMO looks excellent. I can hardly be behind the times if I use WMP v11
. I stopped using Winamp years ago, back in the day it rocked though. Why is it so good, again?
No, the fact you've said many times you dislike WMP10 and use (or rather used) WMP9. Remember, fool!
.
No, the fact you've said many times you dislike WMP10 and use (or rather used) WMP9. Remember, fool!