Heroic Ones Celestial Region 3 Vs. Well Go USA Region 1
-
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 9357
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 19:27
Heroic Ones Celestial Region 3 Vs. Well Go USA Region 1
R3
R1
R3
R1
R3
R1
R3
R1
R3
R1
R1
R3
R1
R3
R1
R3
R1
R3
R1
- smarterray
- Jackie Chan's Little Toe
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 11 Feb 2007, 04:08
- Location: california
- Shingster
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 4140
- Joined: 08 Sep 2006, 11:14
- grim_tales
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 22071
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
- Location: St. Albans, UK
- grim_tales
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 22071
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
- Location: St. Albans, UK
-
- King of Beggars
- Posts: 901
- Joined: 27 Feb 2005, 22:45
- Location: Scotland
Interesting colour differences. I'm rather attracted to the blue on the 2nd one down .
Not a fan of the contrast on either if I'm honest.
This is the thing: Celestial performed two restorations:
1st) PAL non-anamorphic slightly zoom-boxed with higher contrast, but likely with no frame-cuts or other little edits.
2nd) HD PAL (D5 master) that's not as cropped with better handling, but most likely frame-cut (and other little edits) because of laziness - cutting corners in repairing them (or just didn't because they didn't deem it worthy to keep for reasons of TV-broadcast length or something).
I wish companies like WellGoUSA and and Image Entertainment would leave these the fuck alone because unless they know what they're doing, Celestial are going to be shoving crap up their arse. Potentially decent presentations ruined.
WellGoUSA is using the 2nd restoration, but it's whether it's PAL>NTSC from there, or genuine NTSC (but interlaced). Salty, which one of the two is it ? Can you give us a few more details (mono, subtitle quality)?
Thanks!
Not a fan of the contrast on either if I'm honest.
This is the thing: Celestial performed two restorations:
1st) PAL non-anamorphic slightly zoom-boxed with higher contrast, but likely with no frame-cuts or other little edits.
2nd) HD PAL (D5 master) that's not as cropped with better handling, but most likely frame-cut (and other little edits) because of laziness - cutting corners in repairing them (or just didn't because they didn't deem it worthy to keep for reasons of TV-broadcast length or something).
I wish companies like WellGoUSA and and Image Entertainment would leave these the fuck alone because unless they know what they're doing, Celestial are going to be shoving crap up their arse. Potentially decent presentations ruined.
WellGoUSA is using the 2nd restoration, but it's whether it's PAL>NTSC from there, or genuine NTSC (but interlaced). Salty, which one of the two is it ? Can you give us a few more details (mono, subtitle quality)?
Thanks!
Last edited by chenlung on 22 Sep 2008, 14:04, edited 2 times in total.
Scott
- grim_tales
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 22071
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
- Location: St. Albans, UK
-
- Pedicab Driver
- Posts: 217
- Joined: 22 Sep 2008, 00:38
-
- King of Beggars
- Posts: 901
- Joined: 27 Feb 2005, 22:45
- Location: Scotland
-
- Pedicab Driver
- Posts: 217
- Joined: 22 Sep 2008, 00:38
- bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
What a pompous and ridiculous thing to say.saltysam wrote:i'll survive seriously it's not the first and won't be the last time you've spoken for Grim.it's extremely patronising and condescending.it's as if you think Grim is incapable of articulating what he means
Grim didn't take it that way, why would he? There is nothing in the slightest bit patronising or condescending in what I said. Stop talking bollocks, obviously Grim is capable of articulating himself (he's an intelligent chap). I never said or implied anything of the sort.
You were the dumbass for thinking Grim would ever say he'd prefer a non-anamorphic DVD over an anamorphic one. Feeling a little stupid are we? .
Was such a comment really necessary?
-
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 9357
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 19:27
there you go again,speaking for Grim.bradavon wrote:
Grim didn't take it that way, why would he?
there is you fucking prick.just today you've tried to be a dick with him over the ETD blu-ray.which is ironic as over the years you've proved yourself the thickest cunt on these boards,a view there won't be many disagreeing with.bradavon wrote: There is nothing in the slightest bit patronising or condescending in what I said.
Now we have a problem Alex aka forum tool. it's going to need sorting.Big with words behind a screen are we.fucking spineless little shit.let's sort this in a non-cowardly way,what do you say?bradavon wrote:You were the dumbass
- bradavon
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 24430
- Joined: 27 Oct 2004, 20:30
Somebodies had a bad day at work . Do you fancy throwing a few more swear words in? Go on, knock yourself out.
I'm not the one swearing to high heaven and starting pointless arguments . Personally I have better things to be doing, than getting all irate over an Internet Forum 8).Big with words behind a screen are we. fucking spineless little shit.
-
- King of Beggars
- Posts: 901
- Joined: 27 Feb 2005, 22:45
- Location: Scotland