Ken Clarke...

Debate (or Argue) About Anything and Everything.
User avatar
grim_tales
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 21588
Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
Location: St. Albans, UK

Ken Clarke...

Unread postby grim_tales » 20 May 2011, 17:29

When he made his comments about rape crimes ("some rapes are more serious than others")?, I think he could have phrased his words better but was he saying rape isnt a serious crime? Of course he wasn't. All rape is very serious but with every crime (not just rape of course) won't there be differing circumstances so they have to be judged differently.
If the crime happens to a child/young person, should the person who did it be punished more severely? To do that to anyone is disgusting but to do it to a child is even worse.
Punishment given out depends on a lot of things - who did it, who its done to, what history the perpetrator has. I dont think you can have a "one size fits all" notion for punishment, in some rape crimes there are beatings, or until death :( So not everything is the same.

User avatar
Markgway
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 19500
Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04

Re: Ken Clarke...

Unread postby Markgway » 20 May 2011, 17:33

He just phrased his words poorly from what I gather... he clarified his thoughts on Question Time last night. Obviously there is a difference between date rape and aggravated rape (ie. at knifepoint) but clearly both are wrong and should be severly punished. I don't believe in this 50% discount Clarke was proposing. Criminals get short enough jail time as it is.
Image

User avatar
grim_tales
Bruce Lee's Fist
Posts: 21588
Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
Location: St. Albans, UK

Re: Ken Clarke...

Unread postby grim_tales » 20 May 2011, 17:38

Wasnt 18 months the shortest sentence? That doesnt seem very long for such a severe crime.
I agree both date rape/aggrevated should both be punished severely.


Return to “Debate”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests