Tomorrow Never Dies R1 (SE) vs UK R2 (SE) vs UK R2 (UE)

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 18 Jul 2006, 00:06

If anyone sees a difference between the last two caps I'll switch mine for MLAM's.

LMK please. 8)

MLAM · Post by **MLAM** » 18 Jul 2006, 00:09

My Cap

Marks Cap

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 18 Jul 2006, 00:30

Looks the same to me......

MLAM · Post by **MLAM** » 18 Jul 2006, 00:32

Indeed, maybe its a compression thing thats made yours appear a little different.

If no one thinks its worth changing then we can leave it

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 18 Jul 2006, 00:38

In the first case MLAM's looks better as the colours are better but in the second Mark's looks better as Pierce looks to red.

It does prove what I already knew that these should only ever be taken as an indicter and are not scientific tests.

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 18 Jul 2006, 03:47

They look identical to me.

grim_tales · Post by **grim_tales** » 18 Jul 2006, 09:28

I agree Brad, as Romero says (me agree with Romero?!

) caps are only a guide. I did expect the UE's of TND/GE too look better though. I guess because the film is fairly recent its harder to see.

I prefer the bluer look of Cap 1 on the SE in the snow, you can almost feel the coldness.

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 18 Jul 2006, 19:17

grim_tales wrote:I did expect the UE's of TND/GE too look better though.

When all you do is up the bitrate and don't do any remastering that's all that happens. I suspect this is all they've done anyway.

Sony own that shitty Superbit range after all.

Markgway wrote:They look identical to me.

What? Pierce is clearly redder.

grim_tales · Post by **grim_tales** » 18 Jul 2006, 19:26

More likely for the mewer films that could be all they've done. Breakthrough digital process.. pfff.

romerojpg · Post by **romerojpg** » 18 Jul 2006, 19:33

Just get the HD versions I say

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 19 Jul 2006, 02:38

bradavon wrote: What? Pierce is clearly redder.

I meant between my R1 cap and MLAM's R1 cap. Yes, the R2 UE is redder.

grim_tales · Post by **grim_tales** » 19 Jul 2006, 09:07

Hey MLAM have you checked to see what footage is back in the UE (when compared to the cut R2 SE) and what still is missing?

romerojpg · Post by **romerojpg** » 19 Jul 2006, 18:19

Who cares about red caps!? your blowing it out of proportion, caps mean noting at all! you can alter your "TV" settings you know.

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 19 Jul 2006, 18:33

Markgway wrote:I meant between my R1 cap and MLAM's R1 cap. Yes, the R2 UE is redder.

So did I. You honestly can't see one is redder than the other?

grim_tales wrote:and what still is missing?

What's still missing has always been missing and I suspect always will. It's nothing new to cut footage on the editing floor.

grim_tales · Post by **grim_tales** » 19 Jul 2006, 18:36

So the R2 UE's are just the same as the R1's in terms of footage then? Thats what I was asking and what I meant, sorry. Its' odd that the footage cut by the BBFC would warrant a 15, even today.

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 19 Jul 2006, 18:50

bradavon wrote:So did I. You honestly can't see one is redder than the other?

Nope. It's like the same cap posted twice in a row. Why would my R1 cap be redder than MLAM's? I have applied no special features to the captures.

bradavon wrote:It's nothing new to cut footage on the editing floor.

But it's different when it's at the behest of the censors rather than the filmmakers.

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 19 Jul 2006, 18:54

Markgway wrote:Nope. It's like the same cap posted twice in a row. Why would my R1 cap be redder than MLAM's? I have applied no special features to the captures.

It's not, MLAM's is clearly redder than yours. Have a look at the two of Pierce by the plane at the top of this page and you will see the first is redder than the second, or at least you should anyway.

I've no idea why I wasn't asking that. You are both using different software though I presume.

grim_tales wrote:So the R2 UE's are just the same as the R1's in terms of footage then?

Yes but that was always understood. Only you and Mark were somehow expecting anything more.

Markgway wrote:But it's different when it's at the behest of the censors rather than the filmmakers.

Agreed but then I thought Grim was asking for more footage again.

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 19 Jul 2006, 18:56

grim_tales wrote:grim_tales wrote:
It's nothing new to cut footage on the editing floor.

Hey, I didnt write this!!

I've now fixed it on Marks' behalf. No offence but you're a mod too you could've done the same. I've also deleted your post as it no longer makes any sense.

grim_tales · Post by **grim_tales** » 19 Jul 2006, 18:57

Fair enough, sorry Brad.

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 19 Jul 2006, 19:15

bradavon wrote:It's not, MLAM's is clearly redder than yours. Have a look at the two of Pierce by the plane at the top of this page and you will see the first is redder than the second, or at least you should anyway.

Lol, nope, they still look identical to me. 8)

I've no idea why I wasn't asking that. You are both using different software though I presume.

Presumably.

grim_tales wrote:Yes but that was always understood. Only you and Mark were somehow expecting anything more.

I wouldn't say expect, as such, but the 'all previous cuts waived' at the BBFC would lead one to expect a fully uncut version, no?

grim_tales · Post by **grim_tales** » 19 Jul 2006, 19:51

Well if it means "all previous BBFC cuts waived..."

bradavon · Post by **bradavon** » 19 Jul 2006, 20:55

Markgway wrote:I wouldn't say expect, as such, but the 'all previous cuts waived' at the BBFC would lead one to expect a fully uncut version, no?

No

It would lead one to expect that the cuts the BBFC cut before are no longer cut NOT that the BBFC A: Saw an alternate cut or B: Given one. Seriously is that what you were basing your hope of a longer cut on?

The BBFC merely saying the cuts they made before are no longer cut. It stands to reason the BBFC aren't going to literally mean all cuts waived as they're only concerned in their BBFC enforced cuts. It's all by their nature they see.

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 20 Jul 2006, 03:32

Yeah, but unless I'm mistaken the UK cinema version was the same as the PG-13 version. Every territory got the same theatrical cut. I remember seeing the bit with Michelle Yeoh and the shuriken in the cinema release (and being surprised it hadn't been cut) which was subsequently removed for video. It seems that all they've done is waived the video cuts so that the UE is now the same (cut) cinema version that every other region already has. So by saying all cuts waived I thought that's what they meant and not merely video cuts waived. See what I'm saying now?

grim_tales · Post by **grim_tales** » 20 Jul 2006, 09:06

To be fair they don't make the distinction and don't say "all film and video cuts waived", just "all cuts".
Look at the runtimes. 114m 18s - as opposed to 114m 1s or 114m 2s (with 6 secs cut).

If we add 6s on, we get 114m 7s or 8s, so there's still up to 11s extra time left after that. It could be extra black screen or something maybe...?

I guess the ultimate test would be to see if the R1 UE is longer than the 119m rough cut which included MPAA cuts (I think).

Markgway · Post by **Markgway** » 20 Jul 2006, 16:21

grim_tales wrote:To be fair they don't make the distinction and don't say "all film and video cuts waived", just "all cuts".

All cuts should mean all cuts and not some cuts. If it was only the video cuts waived they should have denoted that.

If we add 6s on, we get 114m 7s or 8s, so there's still up to 11s extra time left after that. It could be extra black screen or something maybe...?

Could be anything - but it gave false hope.

I guess the ultimate test would be to see if the R1 UE is longer than the 119m rough cut which included MPAA cuts (I think).

I expect the R1 content will be the same as the R2. The MPAA never cut the film - the filmmakers just submitted the pre-cut UK cinema version.