Goldeneye R1 (SE) vs UK R2 (SE) vs UK R2 (UE)
- Markgway
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 20188
- Joined: 18 Feb 2005, 02:04
The skintones of Brosnan's face in UE Cap 3 looks more natural, but otherwise, oh dear! The cropping is terrible, even compared to Tomorrow Never Dies. Why?? On the plus side for the UE, it's sharpness is less artificial, see Cap 4, resulting in a smoother picture. But it's missing too much info and is too dark as well, again see Cap 3. R1 Cap 2 shows the missing captions, deliberatley designed to be golden. In fact, I've always thought the movie had a golden tint to it, which has been deemphasied in the UE. UE Cap 5 looks surprisingly soft, bordering on the blurry. UE Cap 6 is smoother again, but plain dull. What went wrong...?
-
slasher13
- Royal Tramp
- Posts: 1799
- Joined: 03 Dec 2004, 09:15
- Contact:
- grim_tales
- Bruce Lee's Fist
- Posts: 22155
- Joined: 25 Oct 2004, 18:34
- Location: St. Albans, UK
- captainjoe
- King of Beggars
- Posts: 667
- Joined: 24 Jul 2006, 01:46
- Location: Alberta, Canada
The colour in the face of Bond looks better but again the cropping is disappointing and the whole thing seems a little too dark.
Other than those two problems I think the UE is better. I know that the encoding on the R1 SE is terrible with blocking and pixelation in many of the action scenes. It's annyoing though knowing they had a good chance to really make a great transfer but they really dropped the ball on Goldeneye. This really is the only movie I think has a bad transfer out of all the other 19.
Other than those two problems I think the UE is better. I know that the encoding on the R1 SE is terrible with blocking and pixelation in many of the action scenes. It's annyoing though knowing they had a good chance to really make a great transfer but they really dropped the ball on Goldeneye. This really is the only movie I think has a bad transfer out of all the other 19.

