DangerousLeeHandsome wrote:I'd say Marked for Death BD transfer looks decent and unmanipulated. Grain is a good thing.
Seagal's best:
Above the Law - 3/5
A decent performance from Seagal with some decent action. Too bad the plot gets way too complicated for its own good and the last third of the film kinda fell apart for me.
Hard to Kill - 3.5/5
The plot is predictable, the premise is unoriginal, the acting is passable, but I found HTK to be really entertaining. Action wise, I thought it improved on everything seen in Above the Law.
Marked for Death - 3/5
There's some decent action. The jewelry store fight is money! Could've used a better story that didn't portray Jamaicans in such a negative light.
Under Siege -3.5/5
One of his best efforts IMO. I think I actually like the sequel a bit more.
Under Siege 2: Dark Territory -3.5/5
Probably his best. I really enjoyed this movie.
Exit Wounds - 3/5
Pretty enjoyable even if the plot is dumb as hell. Nonstop action, which I like.
Seagal's Worst:
On Deadly Ground - 0.5/5
The worst piece of shit that actually made it to theatres.
I dont get why you hate "On Deadly Ground" so much? Theres gotta be atleast 10 Seagal movies thats worse than this?
And you totally forgot "Out For Justice"
Personally I kinda like his first 7 movies:
Above the Law (1988)
Hard to Kill (1990)
Marked for Death (1990)
Out for Justice (1991)
Under Siege (1992)
On Deadly Ground (1994)
Under Siege 2: Dark Territory (1995)
It went badly downhill after this. Glimmer Man, Fire Down Below and Exit Wounds are OKs.
Its the same with all good old action stars, around 1995 all went downhill: Jackie Chan (Still great though, but not the same), Arnold Schwarzenegger, JCVD etc... Action movies just got poor after this, with a few exeptions.
